scholarly journals Cancer statistics for the US Hispanic/Latino population, 2021

Author(s):  
Kimberly D. Miller ◽  
Ana P. Ortiz ◽  
Paulo S. Pinheiro ◽  
Priti Bandi ◽  
Adair Minihan ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 265-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alyssa Gwen Ashbaugh ◽  
Chloe Ekelem ◽  
Yessica Landaverde ◽  
Natasha Atanaskova Mesinkovska

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
pp. 74-74
Author(s):  
Mercedes Margarita Morales Aleman ◽  
Isabel C. Scarinci ◽  
Gwendolyn Ferreti

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Alabama (AL) experienced a 145% increase in its Latino population between 2000 and 2010; making it the state with the second fastest growing Latino population in the United States (US) during that time. Adolescent Latinas in the US and in AL are disproportionately affected by sexual health disparities as evidenced by the disproportionate burden of HIV, STIs and early pregnancy compared with their non-Hispanic, White counterparts. Empirical data with adult Latinas in the southeast suggest significant barriers to sexual healthcare access. However, to our knowledge, no other researchers have examined barriers and facilitators to sexual healthcare access for this subpopulation. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine adolescent Latinas’ sexual healthcare needs through in-depth qualitative interviews. These qualitative interviews (phase 1 of a 3-phase study) will inform the development of community-driven, theory-based, culturally-relevant, multi-level intervention strategies to reduce sexual health disparities and increase sexual healthcare access for this group. Community-based participatory research (CBPR), which ensures equitable participation of stakeholder groups through partnerships, and the socioecological model of health, which conceptualizes the individual as nested within a set of social structures, provide the philosophical and theoretical frameworks for the work. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Between January and March of 2017, we will conduct 30 qualitative interviews with eligible adolescents who: self-identify as Latina, are between 15 and 19 years old, have been in the US for over 5 years, and live west AL. We will use venue-based, purposeful convenience sampling to recruit participants. We will manage and analyze the data with the qualitative software NVivo 10. We will use a multi-step, consensus-based process to code and analyze the interviews in the language in which they were conducted (ie, Spanish or English). We will maintain detailed audit trails during the analysis process and seek an inter-rater reliability of 0.85. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We expect to identify barriers and facilitators to sexual healthcare services at distinct levels of the socioecological model of health. Study results and implications for practice in clinical settings will be discussed in detail. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: The proposed research is significant because (1) the state of AL experienced a dramatic increase in its Latino/a population over the last 15 years and adolescent Latinas in AL are disproportionately affected by sexual health disparities; (2) to our knowledge, this will be the first study to examine the multi-level factors associated with sexual healthcare access for adolescent Latinas in the South and inform intervention strategies to promote sexual healthcare access in this population; (3) the work will be conducted under the philosophical lens of CBPR such that community members will be involved in every step of the research process, resulting in culturally relevant intervention strategies.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12036-e12036
Author(s):  
Jigisha P. Thakkar ◽  
Bridget J. McCarthy ◽  
John L. Villano

e12036 Background: In the US, from 2004-2008, approximately 7.8% of all cancers were diagnosed and 15.2% of cancer deaths occurred in those age 85 and older. Due to the aging of the US population, a focus on the incidence of cancer in the elderly population is needed to advance knowledge on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer in this age group. Methods: Data was retrieved from the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Cancer Statistics Review and from the SEER website. Data from seventeen SEER registries for the years 2000-2008 were included. Cancer sites/histologies included invasive cases only, unless otherwise noted, and rates were per 100,000. Age-specific incidence rates for meningioma were obtained from Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States (CBTRUS) Statistical Report: NPCR (National Program of Cancer Registries) and SEER (2004-2007). Results: The overall cancer incidence rate decreases in the elderly age group. The age-specific (crude) SEER incidence rate for all cancer sites combined for those aged 85+ is 2299.65/100,000. Elderly males have a higher incidence rate as compared to elderly females (3220.7 versus 1884.9). Despite the overall decline in the incidence rate in the oldest age group, the cancer sites and/or histologies with continued increasing incidence rates after 85 years of age are: colon, bones and joints, gall bladder, Kaposi’s sarcoma, leukemia, myelodysplastic syndromes, pancreas, soft tissue including heart, vulva, vagina, and meningioma. Conclusions: Among cancer sites with increasing incidence after age 85; colon cancer has the highest incidence rate. Screening and early diagnosis for cancer in the elderly should be critically considered for colorectal cancers.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6041-6041
Author(s):  
Fangjian Guo ◽  
Mihyun Chang ◽  
Abbey Berenson

6041 Background: The incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has been reported to be increasing among both middle-aged and elderly adults in the United States. This study was to assess racial and regional differences in the incidence of OPSCC among adults in the US. Methods: We included 271,037 adult patients ≥ 20 years old diagnosed with potentially HPV-related OPSCC from the US Cancer Statistics 2001–2017 database which essentially covered the entire US population. Incidence of OPSCC was age- adjusted to the US standard population. Annual percentage change (APC) in the incidence was assessed across races/ethnicities and regions of residence. Results: Among these adults with potentially HPV-related OPSCC from 2001-2017, 5.3% were Hispanics, 83.0% were non-Hispanic Whites, and 9.2% were non-Hispanic Blacks, and 79.1% were male. Incidence of OPSCC increased from 3.9 per 100,000 in 2001 to 4.0 per 100,000 in 2017 (APC 0.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01, 0.85) in Hispanics, increased from 5.3 per 100,000 in 2001 to 8.6 per 100,000 in 2017 (APC 2.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.71, 3.24) in non-Hispanic Whites, and decreased from 6.3 per 100,000 in 2001 to 5.1 per 100,000 in 2017 (APC -1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.56, -0.99) in non-Hispanic Blacks. The incidence increased from 5.8 per 100,000 in 2001 to 7.8 per 100,000 in 2017 (APC 1.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.67, 2.21) in the South, increased from 5.0 per 100,000 in 2001 to 7.1 per 100,000 in 2017 (APC 2.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.92, 2.34) in the Northeast, increased from 4.9 per 100,000 in 2001 to 6.3 per 100,000 in 2017 (APC 1.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.53, 2.17) in the West, and increased from 4.9 per 100,000 in 2001 to 7.7 per 100,000 in 2017 (APC 2.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.52, 3.07) in the Midwest. The incidence decreased from 0.9 per 100,000 in 2001 to 0.8 per 100,000 in 2017 (APC -0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.41, -0.20) among adults 20-44 years old, increased from 9.0 per 100,000 in 2001 to 12.7 per 100,000 in 2017 (APC 2.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.66, 2.36) among adults 45-64 years old, and increased from 10.9 per 100,000 in 2001 to 16.7 per 100,000 in 2017 (APC 2.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.75, 3.16) among adults 65+ years old. Conclusions: OPSCC incidence increased across racial/ethnic groups, regions, and age groups from 2001 to 2017, except that the incidence decreased among non-Hispanic Blacks and young people. Underlying causes for the decreasing trend in the incidence of OPSCC among certain groups need further investigation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica L. Petrick ◽  
Lauren E. Barber ◽  
Shaneda Warren Andersen ◽  
Andrea A. Florio ◽  
Julie R. Palmer ◽  
...  

BackgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) incidence rates have increased in younger individuals worldwide. We examined the most recent early- and late-onset CRC rates for the US.MethodsAge-standardized incidence rates (ASIR, per 100,000) of CRC were calculated using the US Cancer Statistics Database’s high-quality population-based cancer registry data from the entire US population. Results were cross-classified by age (20-49 [early-onset] and 50-74 years [late-onset]), race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, American Indian/Alaskan Native, Asian/Pacific Islander), sex, anatomic location (proximal, distal, rectal), and histology (adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine).ResultsDuring 2001 through 2018, early-onset CRC rates significantly increased among American Indians/Alaskan Natives, Hispanics, and Whites. Compared to Whites, early-onset CRC rates are now 21% higher in American Indians/Alaskan Natives and 6% higher in Blacks. Rates of early-onset colorectal neuroendocrine tumors have increased in Whites, Blacks, and Hispanics; early-onset colorectal neuroendocrine tumor rates are 2-times higher in Blacks compared to Whites. Late-onset colorectal adenocarcinoma rates are decreasing, while late-onset colorectal neuroendocrine tumor rates are increasing, in all racial/ethnic groups. Late-onset CRC rates remain 29% higher in Blacks and 15% higher in American Indians/Alaskan Natives compared to Whites. Overall, CRC incidence was higher in men than women, but incidence of early-onset distal colon cancer was higher in women.ConclusionsThe early-onset CRC disparity between Blacks and Whites has decreased, due to increasing rates in Whites—rates in Blacks have remained stable. However, rates of colorectal neuroendocrine tumors are increasing in Blacks. Blacks and American Indians/Alaskan Natives have the highest rates of both early- and late-onset CRC.ImpactOngoing prevention efforts must ensure access to and uptake of CRC screening for Blacks and American Indians/Alaskan Natives.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22535-e22535
Author(s):  
Nedra Joseph ◽  
Samantha St. Laurent ◽  
Jeanenne Joy Nelson ◽  
Shan Zheng ◽  
Heide Stirnadel-Farrant

e22535 Background: Synovial sarcoma (SS) is a rare and aggressive soft tissue sarcoma which primarily affects the extremities of the arms and legs, and can also occur in the head and neck, lungs and pleura, and the trunk. The disease burden of SS is generally extrapolated from overall soft tissue sarcoma (STS) with SS accounting for 4.5% of all STS (587 cases estimated in 2018 in the US) (Noone, 2018; Siegel, 2018). The objective of this study was to provide disease burden estimates specific to SS in the US. Methods: Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 Registries, Nov. 2017 (2000-2015) were analyzed using SEER*Stat software (v8.3.5). The incidence and prevalence of SS was estimated by utilizing SS-specific International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, V.3 (ICD-O-3) and histology codes. Data from 2011-2015 were used to project incidence rates (age-specific and age-adjusted), 5-year limited duration prevalence, number of incidence and prevalent cases, and the age distribution of synovial sarcoma for 2018. Results: In the US, the age-adjusted incidence rate of SS was 0.177 per 100,000 (estimated 580 incident cases) in 2018. SS is more frequently manifested in patients aged 20-49 years, with the highest occurrence of new cases in patients between 45-49 years (incidence rate 0.26 per 100,000). The prevalence rate of SS across all ages was 0.65 per 100,000 (estimated 2129 prevalent cases) as of January 1, 2018. Conclusions: We described incidence and prevalence rates of SS, including age-specific and age-standardized rates, and characterized the age distribution of SS. This approach provided more precise estimates that are specific to SS without extrapolation from STS, and which are not available in the literature. References: Noone AM, et al. (ed). SEER CSR, 1975-2015, https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2015/ . Siegel RL, et al. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:7–30.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document