Lateral Epicondylitis: A Common Cause of Elbow Pain in Primary Care

2021 ◽  
pp. 34-38
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Fleming ◽  
Christian Muller Muller ◽  
Kathryn Lambert Lambert

Lateral epicondylitis (LE) is an overuse injury of the lateral elbow. LE is caused by repetitive motion leading to micro-injury of the wrist extensor muscles that originate along the elbow's lateral aspect. Although LE is commonly referred to as “tennis elbow” many cases are observed in non-athletes. Due to its prevalence in the general population, primary care physicians must be prepared to diagnose and treat LE. Physicians should look for a history of repetitive activities involving patient’s jobs or recreational activities. Exam findings are characterized by pain and tenderness just distal to the lateral epicondyle of the humerus. Resisted movement with an extension of the wrist will typically elicit pain. Ultrasonography is considered the imaging modality of choice for diagnosing LE. Standard radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be helpful. However, diagnosis can usually be made by history and physical examination alone. Most cases of LE respond favorably to conservative therapy. There are several nonoperative options for treatment, but a combination of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and physical therapy that utilizes eccentric muscle stretching is considered first-line. Osteopathic manipulative medicine is also useful in the treatment of LE. Muscle energy (ME) and joint mobilization techniques have been shown to be particularly effective. If non-surgical therapy fails, surgical intervention may provide patients with an additional benefit. This article will review some of the treatment options described above and discuss other diagnostic and therapeutic considerations relevant to LE's management in the primary care setting.

2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (9) ◽  
pp. 683-701
Author(s):  
Diana Cagliero

This article explores ethical issues raised by Primary Care Physicians (PCPs) when diagnosing depression and caring for cross-cultural patients. This study was conducted in three primary care clinics within a major metropolitan area in the Southeastern United States. The PCPs were from a variety of ethnocultural backgrounds including South Asian, Hispanic, East Asian and Caucasian. While medical education training and guidelines aim to teach physicians about the nuances of cross-cultural patient interaction, PCPs report that past experiences guide them in navigating cross-cultural conversations and patient care. In this study, semi-structured interviews were conducted with seven PCPs which were transcribed and underwent thematic analysis to explore how patients’ cultural backgrounds and understanding of depression affected PCPs’ reasoning and diagnosing of depression in patients from different cultural backgrounds. Ethical issues that arose included: limiting treatment options, expressing a patient’s mental health diagnosis in a biomedical sense to reduce stigma, and somatization of mental health symptoms. Ethical implications, such as lack of autonomy, unnecessary testing, and the possible misuse of healthcare resources are discussed.


2002 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 405-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. M. FAIRBANK ◽  
R. J. CORLETT

A common finding in tennis elbow is pain in the region of the lateral epicondyle during resisted extension of the middle finger (Maudsley’s test). We hypothesized that the pain is due to disease in the extensor digitorum communis muscle, rather than to compression of the radial nerve or disease within extensor carpi radialis brevis. Thirteen human forearm specimens were examined. It was found that the extensor digitorum communis was separable into four parts. The part to the middle finger originated from the lateral epicondyle, but the muscle slips to the other fingers originated more distally. Pain ratings were measured in ten patients diagnosed with lateral epicondylitis during isometric finger and wrist extension tests. The results confirmed the high prevalence of a positive Maudsley’s test in lateral epicondylitis, and also that the patients with tenderness at the site of origin of the extensor digitorum communis slip to the middle finger had the greatest pain during middle finger extension. These anatomical and clinical findings clarify the anatomy of extensor digitorum communis, and suggest that this muscle forms the basis for the Maudsley’s test. The muscle may play a greater role in tennis elbow than previously appreciated.


QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanaa Ahmed Hany Abd Eldayem Ahmed El-Naggar ◽  
Mona Mansour Mohammed Hasab El-Naby ◽  
Naglaa Youssef Mohammed Assaf ◽  
Mohja Ahmed Abd El-Fattah Elbadawy

Abstract Background Lateral elbow pain (LEP) or lateral epicondylitis (LE) is a common problem affecting both males and females. Multiple therapeutic modalities are used with different outcomes. Objective The current study aimed at description of the effectiveness of a newly introduced modality, Perineural Injection (PNI) therapy in comparison to the already used therapeutic ultrasound (TUS) as a conventional modality in the treatment of resistant LEP (LE). Patients and methods This is a longitudinal interventional study. Thirty patients of both sexes aged between 21 to 62 years old who had LE were randomly allocated into two groups (15 each). In PNI group, 5% buffered dextrose was injected subcutaneously around the lateral epicondyle once weekly for 8 weeks. In TUS group, continuous US was used 3 sessions per week for 4 weeks. Tenderness grading scale, visual analogue scale (VAS), Patient- Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation Questionnaire (PRTEE) score, and ultrasonographic evaluation were used before and 12 weeks after treatment. Results In both groups, there was a high significant clinical improvement at 12th week after treatment. However, the improvement was better in the PNI group than the TUS group. By US evaluation at 12th week after treatment, there was a significant decrease in hypoechoic areas and disturbed fibrillar pattern in PNI group compared to before therapy (p < 0.001 and = 0.025) respectively. But in TUS group, there was decrease in hypoechoic areas and tendon thickness compared to before treatment (p = 0.02 and 0.026) respectively. Conclusion Both PNI and TUS therapies for LE gave clinical improvement for pain, functional limitations and some ultrasonographic findings (as echogenity, fibrillar pattern and tendon thickness). However, PNI therapy gave better outcome as compared to TUS.


2009 ◽  
Vol 12 (01) ◽  
pp. 11-19
Author(s):  
Xin-Ru Du ◽  
Ling-Xiu Zhao

Because of few anatomic reports investigating the mechanism of lateral epicondylitis (tennis elbow), we performed cadaveric and clinical studies to investigate the involvement of neurovascular bundles passing through the common extensor origin. We dissected and observed under a light microscope tissue samples of neurovascular bundles passing through the common extensor tendon from 40 upper left and right limbs from cadavers. Tissue samples were prepared by hematoxylin & eosin and Weil's myelin staining. We also investigated the records of 20 patients who had been treated for lateral epicondylitis between 1991 and 2004. From cadavers, we found 60 bundles in the common extensor tendon, each 0.5 to 1.0 mm in diameter, with more bundles in the right than left limbs. Twenty-four of these bundles passed over the vertex of the lateral epicondyle of the humerus, and most of the bundles contained only one artery each. The bundles mostly originated from the radial recurrent artery, passing through the aponeurosis of the extensor corpi radialis brevis, but in some cases originated from the radial collateral artery, passing through the aponeurosis of the triceps brachii muscle. The bundles had a membranous covering when passing through the aponeurosis and produced a hiatus. Histological analysis of resected common extensor tendon tissue, 1 cm in diameter, of patients showed hyaline degeneration and fibrosis formation infiltration. Neurovascular bundles passed through the common extensor tendon in nine cases; six cases showed pulsing bleeding. After a mean follow-up of two years (6–48 months), 16 cases showed excellent results, two showed good results and two showed reliefs. Lateral epicondylitis could be caused by damage to neurovascular bundles when they pass through the common extensor origin; one cause of pain is the neurovascular bundle being compressed when passing through the common extensor tendon, secondary to the pathologic degeneration of the origin of the common extensor tendon.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gouri Kalaskar ◽  
R. K. Sinha ◽  
Pratik Phansopkar

Abstract Background: A typical musculotendinous degenerative condition of the extensors cause at the humerus lateral epicondyle is known as Lateral epicondylitis. Various treatment methods are used in treating lateral epicondylitis. Methods: Thirty Participants with Lateral Epicondylitis shall be recruited in a comparative experimental study. Subjects will be randomized to either (1) Supervised Exercise Programme group, or (2) Cyriax Physiotherapy group. Over a 4-week time period, a 3 times in week for the total of 12 sessions, immediately following baseline assessment and randomization, subjects in both groups will receive Extensor Carpi Radialis Brevis muscle’s static stretching along with the wrist extensor’s eccentric strengthening and Ultrasound and transverse deep friction massage for 10 min with Mill’s manipulation and Ultrasound respectively. Discussion: Effectiveness of the interventions on the pain and the functional improvement will be assessed by visual analogue scale and the Tennis Elbow Function Scale respectively.


2005 ◽  
Vol 00 (01) ◽  
pp. 93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald W Lewis ◽  
Mark M Newell

In November 1996, the American Urological Association (AUA) handed down guidelines for treating erectile dysfunction (ED), and urged all physicians to give sound and unbiased explanations of all ED treatments to their patients.1Currently, nearly all urologists and many primary care physicians routinely ask whether their patients are experiencing erectile problems. If the answer is positive, then treatment options are discussed.


2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashok Gowda ◽  
Gannon Kennedy ◽  
Stacey Gallacher ◽  
Jennie Garver ◽  
Theodore Blaine

Lateral epicondylitis, commonly referred to as tennis elbow, is a syndrome characterized by pain over the origin of the common extensor muscles of the fingers, hand and wrist at the lateral epicondyle. Reports of 70-90% response to conservative treatment at one year have been documented in the literature though refractory cases often require surgical management. Arthroscopic treatment of lateral epicondylitis allows for intra-articular visualization for concomitant pathology and localization of the Extensor Carpi Radialis Brevis tendon. Additionally, compared to the open technique, the arthroscopic technique has a lower morbidity and an earlier return to work and activity. Here we describe a three portal technique for improved visualization in arthroscopic lateral epicondylitis release.


2016 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. CMTIM.S39404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert B. Lewis ◽  
Bryan A. Reyes ◽  
Michael S. Khazzam

This article reviews the assessment and management of the pathology of the long head of the biceps tendon, a disease commonly encountered by primary care physicians and orthopedic surgeons. We include a discussion of relevant anatomy, function, pathoanatomy, natural history of the disease, diagnostic methods, and treatment options. Recent literature on the function of the long head of the bicep (LHB) is reviewed. Literature on our evolving understanding of the pathoanatomy behind LHB tendinopathy is discussed. We also discuss the effectiveness of current diagnostic and treatment modalities.


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (12) ◽  
pp. 232596711774207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael P. Gaspar ◽  
Michael A. Motto ◽  
Sarah Lewis ◽  
Sidney M. Jacoby ◽  
Randall W. Culp ◽  
...  

Background: Recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis (LE) is a common debilitating condition, with numerous treatment options of varying success. An injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been shown to improve LE, although it is unclear whether the method of needling used in conjunction with a PRP injection is of clinical importance. Purpose: To determine whether percutaneous needle tenotomy is superior to percutaneous needle fenestration when each is combined with a PRP injection for the treatment of recalcitrant LE. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 93 patients with recalcitrant LE were treated with a PRP injection and percutaneous needle fenestration (n = 45) or percutaneous needle tenotomy (n = 48) over a 5-year study interval. Preoperative patient data, including visual analog scale for pain (VAS-P), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), and Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) scores and grip strength, were obtained from a chart review and compared with postoperative values obtained prospectively. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of complications, need for additional interventions, return to work, and patient satisfaction. Results: At a mean follow-up of 40 months, significant improvements in VAS-P (mean, –6.1; 95% CI, –6.8 to –5.5; P < .0001), QuickDASH (mean, –46; 95% CI, –52 to –40; P < .0001), and PRTEE (mean, –57; 95% CI, –64 to –50; P < .0001) scores and grip strength (mean, +6.1 kg; 95% CI, 4.9 to 7.3; P < .0001) were observed across the entire study cohort, with no significant differences noted between the fenestration and tenotomy groups. Nine of 45 patients (22%) underwent additional procedures to treat recurrent symptoms in the fenestration group compared with 5 of 48 patients (10%) in the tenotomy group ( P = .05). No complications occurred in any patients, and no patients expressed dissatisfaction with their treatment course. Conclusion: A PRP injection with concomitant percutaneous needling is an effective treatment for recalcitrant LE, with sustained improvements in pain, strength, and function demonstrated at a mean follow-up of longer than 3 years. Although the method of concomitant needling does not appear to have a significant effect on treatment outcomes, more aggressive needle tenotomy is less likely to require conversion to open tenotomy than needle fenestration in the short term to midterm.


2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley Hite ◽  
David Victorson ◽  
Rita Elue ◽  
Beth A. Plunkett

Purpose: To determine whether primary care physicians can accurately assess body mass index (BMI) by visual inspection and to assess barriers related to the diagnosis and management of obesity. Design: Prospective Survey Study. Setting: Hospitals and Clinics. Subjects: Primary care providers in the fields of Internal Medicine, Family Medicine and Obstetrics/Gynecology. Measures: Measures investigated included providers visual assessment of BMI, BMI knowledge, diagnosis and management of obese patients, and perceived barriers to treatment. Analysis: Top and bottom quartiles and total scores were determined for responses regarding the reported management of obesity, reported comfort with care, and reported barriers to care and used as the cut point. Statistical analyses were utilized to examine relations and compare groups. Results: 206 (74%) of the 280 eligible providers completed the survey. The accuracy of visual assessment of BMI was 52%. Physicians were more likely to underestimate BMI than overestimate (36% ± 4% vs 12% ± 6%, respectively, P < .001). Although 91% of providers report routinely calculating BMI, only 61% routinely discuss BMI. Providers feel comfortable providing exercise (72%) and dietary counseling (61%). However, fewer are comfortable prescribing medical (16.4%) and surgical options (36%). Conclusion: Visual assessment of BMI is not reliable. Primary care physicians in our study population do not consistently discuss obesity with their patients and many report insufficient knowledge with regard to treatment options. Further studies are needed to determine whether these results are valid for other physicians in various practice settings and to mid-level providers. In addition, research is needed that investigate how collaboration with providers outside the medical field could reduce the burden on physicians in treating patients with overweight or obesity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document