Ethics Review: A Student's Tale

2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-43
Author(s):  
Yvonne Downs
Keyword(s):  
Ethics Review

scholarly journals Ultrasound-guided superficial cervical plexus block for analgesia in patients undergoing craniotomy via suboccipital retrosigmoid approach: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. e034003
Author(s):  
Kun Peng ◽  
Min Zeng ◽  
Jia Dong ◽  
Xiang Yan ◽  
Dexiang Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nerve Block ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Numerical Rating Scale ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Cervical Plexus ◽  
Ethics Review ◽  
Superficial Cervical Plexus Block ◽  
Cervical Plexus Block ◽  
Plexus Block

IntroductionScalp nerve block has been proven to be an alternative choice to opioids in multimodal analgesia. However, for the infratentorial space-occupying craniotomy, especially the suboccipital retrosigmoid craniotomy, scalp nerve block is insufficient.Methods and analysisThe study is a prospective, single-centre, randomised, paralleled-group controlled trial. Patients scheduled to receive elective suboccipital retrosigmoid craniotomy will be randomly assigned to the superficial cervical plexus block group or the control group. After anaesthesia induction, superficial cervical plexus nerve block will be performed under the guidance of ultrasound. The primary outcome is the cumulative consumption of sufentanil by the patient-controlled intravenous analgesia pump within 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include the cumulative consumption of sufentanil at other four time points and numerical rating scale pain severity score.Ethics and disseminationThe protocol (version number: 2.0, 10 April 2019) has been approved by the Ethics Review Committee of China Registered Clinical Trials (Ethics Review No. ChiECRCT-20190047). The findings of this study will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and at scientific conferences.Trial registration numberNCT04036812

scholarly journals Prenatal genetic testing for cystic fibrosis: a systematic review of clinical effectiveness and an ethics review

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 258-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon J. M. Kessels ◽  
Drew Carter ◽  
Benjamin Ellery ◽  
Skye Newton ◽  
Tracy L. Merlin
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cystic Fibrosis ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Clinical Effectiveness ◽  
Prenatal Genetic Testing ◽  
Ethics Review

scholarly journals Human Rights Research and Ethics Review: Protecting Individuals or Protecting the State?

PLoS Medicine ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. e1001325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph J. Amon ◽  
Stefan D. Baral ◽  
Chris Beyrer ◽  
Nancy Kass
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
The State ◽  
Ethics Review

Ethics review and clinical trials

The Lancet ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 351 (9108) ◽  
pp. 1065 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hilary Madder ◽  
Paul Myles ◽  
Roderick McRae
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Ethics Review

A Novel Framework for Reflecting on the Functioning of Research Ethics Review Panels

2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin Macduff ◽  
Andrew McKie ◽  
Sheelagh Martindale ◽  
Anne Marie Rennie ◽  
Bernice West ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Nursing Education ◽  
Research Ethics ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Rapid Change ◽  
Health Care Research ◽  
Ethical Review ◽  
Review Panel ◽  
Ethics Review ◽  
Research Ethics Review

In the past decade structures and processes for the ethical review of UK health care research have undergone rapid change. Although this has focused users' attention on the functioning of review committees, it remains rare to read a substantive view from the inside. This article presents details of processes and findings resulting from a novel structured reflective exercise undertaken by a newly formed research ethics review panel in a university school of nursing and midwifery. By adopting and adapting some of the knowledge to be found in the art and science of malt whisky tasting, a framework for critical reflection is presented and applied. This enables analysis of the main contemporary issues for a review panel that is primarily concerned with research into nursing education and practice. In addition to structuring the panel's own literary narrative, the framework also generates useful visual representation for further reflection. Both the analysis of issues and the framework itself are presented as of potential value to all nurses, health care professionals and educationalists with an interest in ethical review.

Centralized and Non-Centralized Ethics Review: A Five Nation Study

2006 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
MAUREEN H. FITZGERALD ◽  
PAUL A. PHILLIPS
Keyword(s):  
Ethics Review
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document