scholarly journals A Comparative Assessment of Various Turbulence Models Applied for Simulation of Air-Water Flow Over Chute Spillway

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saeed Shayanseresht ◽  
Mohammad Manafpour
Keyword(s):  
Turbulence Model ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Pressure Head ◽  
Critical Conditions ◽  
Flow Depth ◽  
Air Concentration ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Flow Equations ◽  
Chute Flow ◽  
Reference Equations

Chute aerators have been largely used to reduce cavitation hazard in high head spillways. There is no definite turbulence model for simulating these devices in smooth spillways in spite of its importance in critical conditions. A simulation in two-phase air-water chute flow and its aerator with five different turbulence models (RNG, Standard and Realizable k–ε Models, SST and Standards k–ω Models) has been numerically investigated by Fluent software. Finite Volume and VOF methods were used for discretization of flow equations and free surface modeling. Flow depth, velocity and bottom pressure comparison were made along with the air cavity length determination by numerical, experimental and reference equations. The best model with the minimum value of error percentage for flow depth and velocity was RNG k–ε turbulence model. The realizable and RNG k–ε turbulence models showed better results for the pressure head at the bottom of the chute. The RNG k–ε model results for the jet length have a very slight difference with the experimental results. The length of the cavity is closely associated with the flow emergence angle θ’ over aerators. The bottom air concentration of spillway chute simulated by all the turbulence models, except for the RNG k–ε model, can be overestimated and therefore may affect the designing of aerator geometry.

Application of Wray-Agarwal turbulence model for numerical simulation of gas-solid flows in CFB risers

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-25
Author(s):  
Yali Shao ◽  
Ramesh K. Agarwal ◽  
Xudong Wang ◽  
Baosheng Jin
Keyword(s):  
Turbulence Model ◽  
Circulating Fluidized Bed ◽  
Volume Fraction ◽  
Solid Phase ◽  
Solid Volume Fraction ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Efficient Simulation ◽  
Pressure Profiles ◽  
First Time

Abstract In recent decades, increasing attention has been focused on accurate modeling of circulating fluidized bed (CFB) risers to provide valuable guidance to design, optimization and operation of reactors. Turbulence model plays an important role in accurate prediction of complex gas-solid flows. Recently developed Wray-Agarwal (WA) model is a one-equation turbulence model with the advantages of high computational efficiency and competitive accuracy with two-equation models. In this paper for the first time, Eulerian-Eulerian approach coupled with different turbulence models including WA model, standard κ-ε model and shear stress transport (SST) κ-ω model is employed to simulate two-phase flows of gas phase and solid phase in two CFB risers, in order to assess accuracy and efficiency of WA model compared to other well-known two-equation models. Predicted gas-solid flow dynamic characteristics including the gas-solid volume fraction distributions in radial and axial directions, pressure profiles and solid mass flux distributions are compared with data obtained from experiment in detail. The results demonstrate WA model is very promising for accurate and efficient simulation of gas-solid multiphase flows.

Comparison of Two Two-Equation Turbulence Model Used for the Numerical Simulation of Underwater Ammunition Fuze Turbine Flow Field

2012 ◽  
Vol 591-593 ◽  
pp. 1968-1972
Author(s):  
De Zhang Shen ◽  
He Zhang ◽  
Hao Jie Li
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Simulation ◽  
Turbulence Model ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Axial Pressure ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Speed Increase ◽  
Pressure Coefficients ◽  
Surface Pressure Distribution ◽  
Calculation Results ◽  
Distribution Trends

To figure out the problem of turbulence simulation of underwater ammunition fuze turbine numerical simulation, respectively, realizable k-ε turbulence model and SST k-ω turbulence model are used for two-phase flow numerical simulation of the turbine rotation. The analysis compared the calculation results of the two turbulence models. The results showed that: the cavitation scale obtained from realizable k-ε turbulence model is shorter than that of SST k-ω turbulence model; turbine surface pressure distribution trends are similar of this two model, the results of realizable k-ε turbulence model are bigger than SST k-ω turbulence model; the turbine axial pressure coefficients using realizable k-ε turbulence model are also bigger than that of SST k-ω turbulence model, and the deviation increases with the speed increase.

Numerical Prediction of a Multistage Centrifugal Pump Performance With Stationary and Moving Mesh

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Nocente ◽  
Tufan Arslan ◽  
Torbjørn K. Nielsen
Keyword(s):  
Centrifugal Pump ◽  
Turbulence Model ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Transient State ◽  
Computational Effort ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Ansys Fluent ◽  
Performance Report

The present work reviews a comparison between calculations of a steady and unsteady three dimensional (3D) flow past the diffuser channels of a centrifugal pump. The commercial software ANSYS Fluent has been used. The considered domain is one of the three stages, since each has exactly the same design. In the first part, simulations are carried out at the best efficiency point (BEP) both steady and transient state, single phase flow and four different turbulence models. Results are compared with the performance report from the manufacturer. In the second part, only the realizable k-ε turbulence model has been taken into account. The simulations have been repeated for different mass flows and the results were again compared with the data from the manufacturer. The comparison performed in the first part shows that integral quantities results are not sensibly influenced by the turbulence model. The comparison at different mass flow shows that the steady state simulations demonstrated to be a good approximation of the transient state, always containing the error within an acceptable limit. The minor computational effort needed makes it attractive to be used for further investigations which will involve two-phase flow studies on the same pump.

Particle Trajectory Study in Submerged Flows With Baffles Using ν2¯−f and k−ε Turbulence Models

2010 ◽  
Vol 132 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Mehdizadeh ◽  
B. Firoozabadi ◽  
S. A. Sherif
Keyword(s):  
Turbulence Model ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Test Case ◽  
Complex Flow ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Erosion And Deposition ◽  
Flow Features ◽  
Elliptic Relaxation ◽  
Surface Jet

In this paper, the structure of a wall jet deflected by a baffle along with the trajectory of particles has been studied. This baffle is used to produce a stable deflected surface jet, thereby deflecting the high-velocity supercritical stream away from the bed to the surface. An elliptic relaxation turbulence model (ν2¯−f model) has been used to simulate this submerged flow. In recent years, the ν2¯−f turbulence model has become increasingly popular due to its ability to account for near-wall damping without use of damping functions. In addition, it has been proven that the ν2¯−f model is superior to other Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) methods in many flows where complex flow features are present. In this study, we compare the results of the ν2¯−f model with available experimental data. Since erosion and deposition are coupled, the study of this problem should consider both of these phenomena using a proper approach. In addition to erosion over the bed, the trajectory of the particles is examined using a Lagrangian–Eulerian approach, the distribution of deposited particles over the bed is predicted for a two-phase test case based on a series of numerical simulations. Results show that the maximum erosion happens in a place in which no particle can be deposited, which causes the bed to deform very rapidly in that region. This should help prevent or reduce erosion over the bed. On the other hand, the study will help predict the trajectory of particles and the deposition rates at any section of the channel, and should thus provide useful information to control the erosion and deposition on the channel bed.

scholarly journals Analysis of Flow Characteristics and Effects of Turbulence Models for the Butterfly Valve

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (14) ◽  
pp. 6319
Author(s):  
Sung-Woong Choi ◽  
Hyoung-Seock Seo ◽  
Han-Sang Kim
Keyword(s):  
Turbulence Model ◽  
Dissipation Rate ◽  
Flow Characteristics ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Flow Properties ◽  
Nominal Diameter ◽  
Large Pressure ◽  
Sst Model ◽  
Turbulence Effect ◽  
Valve Opening

In the present study, the flow characteristics of butterfly valves with different sizes DN 80 (nominal diameter: 76.2 mm), DN 262 (nominal diameter: 254 mm), DN 400 (nominal diameter: 406 mm) were numerically investigated under different valve opening percentages. Representative two-equation turbulence models of two-equation k-epsilon model of Launder and Sharma, two-equation k-omega model of Wilcox, and two-equation k-omega SST model of Menter were selected. Flow characteristics of butterfly valves were examined to determine turbulence model effects. It was determined that increasing turbulence effect could cause many discrepancies between turbulence models, especially in areas with large pressure drop and velocity increase. In addition, sensitivity analysis of flow properties was conducted to determine the effect of constants used in each turbulence model. It was observed that the most sensitive flow properties were turbulence dissipation rate (Epsilon) for the k-epsilon turbulence model and turbulence specific dissipation rate (Omega) for the k-omega turbulence model.

scholarly journals Turbulence model performance for ventilation components pressure losses

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karsten Tawackolian ◽  
Martin Kriegel
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Turbulence Model ◽  
Pressure Loss ◽  
Low Reynolds Number ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Test Case ◽  
Pressure Losses ◽  
Loss Coefficients ◽  
Near Wall

AbstractThis study looks to find a suitable turbulence model for calculating pressure losses of ventilation components. In building ventilation, the most relevant Reynolds number range is between 3×104 and 6×105, depending on the duct dimensions and airflow rates. Pressure loss coefficients can increase considerably for some components at Reynolds numbers below 2×105. An initial survey of popular turbulence models was conducted for a selected test case of a bend with such a strong Reynolds number dependence. Most of the turbulence models failed in reproducing this dependence and predicted curve progressions that were too flat and only applicable for higher Reynolds numbers. Viscous effects near walls played an important role in the present simulations. In turbulence modelling, near-wall damping functions are used to account for this influence. A model that implements near-wall modelling is the lag elliptic blending k-ε model. This model gave reasonable predictions for pressure loss coefficients at lower Reynolds numbers. Another example is the low Reynolds number k-ε turbulence model of Wilcox (LRN). The modification uses damping functions and was initially developed for simulating profiles such as aircraft wings. It has not been widely used for internal flows such as air duct flows. Based on selected reference cases, the three closure coefficients of the LRN model were adapted in this work to simulate ventilation components. Improved predictions were obtained with new coefficients (LRNM model). This underlined that low Reynolds number effects are relevant in ventilation ductworks and give first insights for suitable turbulence models for this application. Both the lag elliptic blending model and the modified LRNM model predicted the pressure losses relatively well for the test case where the other tested models failed.

Assessment of turbulence models for bubbly flows: Toward a five-equation turbulence model

2020 ◽  
Vol 220 ◽  
pp. 115425
Author(s):  
Ghazi Bellakhal ◽  
Fathia Chaibina ◽  
Jamel Chahed
Keyword(s):  
Turbulence Model ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Bubbly Flows

Evaluation of Different Turbulence Models Applied in Turbopump’s Hydraulic Turbine

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Ferreira Corrêa Barbosa ◽  
Daniel da Silva Tonon ◽  
Luiz Henrique Lindquist Whitacker ◽  
Jesuino Takachi Tomita ◽  
Cleverson Bringhenti
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Conditions ◽  
Turbulence Model ◽  
Rotor Blade ◽  
Space Shuttle ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Tip Clearance ◽  
Test Facility ◽  
Speed Ratio ◽  
Computational Domain ◽  
Axial Turbine

Abstract The aim of this work is an evaluation of different turbulence models applied in Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) techniques in the turbomachinery area, in this case, in an axial turbine stage used in turbopump (TP) application. The tip clearance region was considered in this study because it has a high influence in turbomachinery performance. In this region, due to its geometry and the relative movement between the rotor row and casing, there are losses associated with vortices and secondary flow making the flowfield even more turbulent and complex. Moreover, the flow that leaks in the tip region does not participate in the energy transfer between the fluid and rotor blades, degradating the machine efficiency and performance. In this work, the usual flat tip rotor blade geometry was considered. The modeling of turbulent flow based on Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations predicts the variation of turbine operational characteristics that is sufficient for the present turbomachine and flow analysis. Therefore, the appropriate choice of the turbulence model for the study of a given flow is essential to obtain adequate results using numerical approximations. This comparison become important due to the fact that there is no general turbulence model for all engineering applications that has fluid and flow. The turbomachine considered in the present work, is the first stage of the hydraulic axial turbine used in the Low Pressure Oxidizer Turbopump (LPOTP) of the Space Shuttle Main Engine (SSME), considering the 3.0% tip clearance configuration relative to rotor blade height. The turbulence models evaluated in this work were the SST (Shear Stress Transport), the k-ε Standard and the k-ε RNG. The computational domain was discretized in several control volumes based on unstructured mesh. All the simulations were performed using the commercial software developed by ANSYS, CFX v15.0 (ANSYS). All numerical settings and how the boundary conditions were imposed at different surfaces are explained in the work. The boundary conditions settings follow the same rule used in the test facility and needs some attention during the simulations to vary the Blade-Jet-Speed ratio parameter adequately. The results from numerical simulations, were synthesized and compared with the experimental data published by National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), in which the turbine efficiency and its jet velocity parameter are analyzed for each turbulence model result. The work fluid considered in this work was water, the same fluid used in the NASA test facility.

A Study of the Behaviour of a Single-Bladed Waste-Water Pump

2006 ◽  
Vol 220 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Keays ◽  
C Meskell
Keyword(s):  
Waste Water ◽  
Power Consumption ◽  
Turbulence Model ◽  
Numerical Models ◽  
Sewage Treatment ◽  
Computational Cost ◽  
Primary Source ◽  
Pressure Head ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Pump Efficiency

A single-vaned centrifugal pump, typical of the kind employed in waste-water applications (e.g. sewage treatment), has been investigated numerically. The primary objective was to identify a modelling approach that was accurate, but at an acceptable computational cost. A test program has been executed to provide data to validate the numerical models. The global performance of the pump was assessed in terms of the pressure head, the mass flowrate, the power consumption, and the pump efficiency. In addition, time-resolved surface-pressure measurements were made at the volute wall. Five combinations of three modelling approximations (two or 3D; k-ε or Reynolds stress model turbulence model; unsteady or quasi-steady) were investigated and compared with the experimental results. It was found that the choice of turbulence model did not have a significant effect on the predictions. In all cases, the head-discharge curve was well predicted. However, it was found that only the quasi-steady models could capture the trend of the power consumption curve, and hence that of the efficiency. Discrepancies in the magnitude of the power consumption can be accounted for by the lack of losses such as leakage in the numerical models. Qualitative analysis of the numerical results identifies the trailing edge of the impeller as the primary source of power loss, with the flow in the region of the cut water also contributing significantly to the poor overall efficiency of the design.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document