Patient experience of primary care

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Patient Experience

scholarly journals Patient experience of infertility management in primary care: an in-depth interview study

2009 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 309-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Wilkes ◽  
N. Hall ◽  
A. Crosland ◽  
A. Murdoch ◽  
G. Rubin
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Patient Experience ◽  
Interview Study ◽  
Depth Interview

Mental health care integration and primary care patient experience in the Veterans Health Administration

Healthcare ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 100587
Author(s):  
Lucinda B. Leung ◽  
Danielle Rose ◽  
Rong Guo ◽  
Catherine E. Brayton ◽  
Lisa V. Rubenstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Patient Experience ◽  
Primary Care Patient ◽  
Veterans Health Administration ◽  
Care Patient ◽  
Veterans Health ◽  
Health Administration ◽  
Care Integration

scholarly journals Capturing patient experience: a qualitative study of implementing real-time feedback in primary care

2016 ◽  
Vol 66 (652) ◽  
pp. e786-e793 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Carter ◽  
Antoinette Davey ◽  
Christine Wright ◽  
Natasha Elmore ◽  
Jenny Newbould ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Patient Experience

scholarly journals Association of Medical Scribes in Primary Care With Physician Workflow and Patient Experience

2018 ◽  
Vol 178 (11) ◽  
pp. 1467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pranita Mishra ◽  
Jacqueline C. Kiang ◽  
Richard W. Grant
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Patient Experience ◽  
Medical Scribes

scholarly journals Intra-cluster correlation coefficients in primary care patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension

Trials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Lin Lee ◽  
Yvonne Mei Fong Lim ◽  
Kian Boon Law ◽  
Sheamini Sivasampu
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Patient Experience ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Processes Of Care ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Cluster Correlation

Abstract Introduction There are few sources of published data on intra-cluster correlation coefficients (ICCs) amongst patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and/or hypertension in primary care, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. ICC values are necessary for determining the sample sizes of cluster randomized trials. Hence, we aim to report the ICC values for a range of measures from a cluster-based interventional study conducted in Malaysia. Method Baseline data from a large study entitled Evaluation of Enhanced Primary Health Care interventions in public health clinics (EnPHC-EVA: Facility) were used in this analysis. Data from 40 public primary care clinics were collected through retrospective chart reviews and a patient exit survey. We calculated the ICCs for processes of care, clinical outcomes and patient experiences in patients with T2D and/or hypertension using the analysis of variance approach. Results Patient experience had the highest ICC values compared to processes of care and clinical outcomes. The ICC values ranged from 0.01 to 0.48 for processes of care. Generally, the ICC values for processes of care for patients with hypertension only are higher than those for T2D patients, with or without hypertension. However, both groups of patients have similar ICCs for antihypertensive medications use. In addition, similar ICC values were observed for clinical outcomes, ranging from 0.01 to 0.09. For patient experience, the ICCs were between 0.03 (proportion of patients who are willing to recommend the clinic to their friends and family) and 0.25 (for Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care item 9, Given a copy of my treatment plan). Conclusion The reported ICCs and their respective 95% confidence intervals for T2D and hypertension will be useful for estimating sample sizes and improving efficiency of cluster trials conducted in the primary care setting, particularly for low- and middle-income countries.

scholarly journals Patient experience on self-management support among primary care patients with diabetes and hypertension

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (7) ◽  
pp. 37-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Tsuey Lim ◽  
Yvonne Mei Fong Lim ◽  
Xin Rou Teh ◽  
Yi Lin Lee ◽  
Siti Aminah Ismail ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Patient Experience ◽  
Educational Level ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Short Version ◽  
Design Decision ◽  
Management Support ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Primary Care Patients

Abstract Objective To determine the extent of self-management support (SMS) provided to primary care patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and hypertension and its associated factors. Design Cross-sectional survey conducted between April and May 2017. Setting Forty public clinics in Malaysia. Participants A total of 956 adult patients with T2D and/or hypertension were interviewed. Main Outcome Measures Patient experience on SMS was evaluated using a structured questionnaire of the short version Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care instrument, PACIC-M11. Linear regression analysis adjusting for complex survey design was used to determine the association of patient and clinic factors with PACIC-M11 scores. Results The overall PACIC-M11 mean was 2.3(SD,0.8) out of maximum of 5. The subscales’ mean scores were lowest for patient activation (2.1(SD,1.1)) and highest for delivery system design/decision support (2.9(SD,0.9)). Overall PACIC-M11 score was associated with age, educational level and ethnicity. Higher overall PACIC-M11 ratings was observed with increasing difference between actual and expected consultation duration [β = 0.01; 95% CI (0.001, 0.03)]. Better scores were also observed among patients who would recommend the clinic to friends and family [β = 0.19; 95% CI (0.03, 0.36)], when health providers were able to explain things in ways that were easy to understand [β = 0.34; 95% CI (0.10, 0.59)] and knew about patients’ living conditions [β = 0.31; 95% CI (0.15, 0.47)]. Conclusions Our findings indicated patients received low levels of SMS. PACIC-M11 ratings were associated with age, ethnicity, educational level, difference between actual and expected consultation length, willingness to recommend the clinic and provider communication skills.

scholarly journals Perceptions of older adults in Ontario, Canada on the implementation and impact of a primary care programme, Health Teams Advancing Patient Experience: Strengthening Quality (Health TAPESTRY): a descriptive qualitative study

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. e026257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenny Ploeg ◽  
Ruta Kristina Valaitis ◽  
Laura Cleghorn ◽  
Marie-Lee Yous ◽  
Jessica Gaber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Goal Setting ◽  
Patient Experience ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Care Programme ◽  
Quality Health

ObjectivesThe aim of the study was to explore the perceptions of older adults on the implementation and impact of Health Teams Advancing Patient Experience: Strengthening Quality (Health TAPESTRY), a multicomponent primary care programme that seeks to improve care coordination for individuals through health-related goal-setting supported by trained lay volunteers who are an extension of an interprofessional team, and the use of technology to support communication among the team.DesignThis study used a qualitative descriptive design.SettingThe setting for this study was two primary care practice sites located in a large urban area in Ontario, Canada.ParticipantsThe sample consisted of community-dwelling older adults aged 70 years and older. Participants were recruited from a convenience sample obtained from 360 clients who participated in the 12-month Health TAPESTRY randomised controlled trial.MethodsSemistructured interviews were conducted with 32 older adults either face-to-face or by telephone. Interviews were transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed using a constant comparative approach to develop themes.ResultsOlder adults’ perceptions about the Health TAPESTRY programme included (1) the lack of a clear purpose and understanding of how information was shared among providers, (2) mixed positive and negative perceptions of goal-setting and provider follow-up after inhome visits by volunteers, (3) positive impacts such as satisfaction with the primary care team, and (4) the potential for the programme to become a regular programme and applied to other communities and groups.ConclusionsOlder adults living in the community may benefit from greater primary care support provided through enhanced team-based approaches. Programmes such as Health TAPESTRY facilitate opportunities for older adults to work with primary care providers to meet their self-identified needs. By exploring perceptions of clients, primary care programmes can be further refined and expanded for various populations.

Faster and better: Improving the diagnostic phase of lung cancer at a system level.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (8_suppl) ◽  
pp. 115-115
Author(s):  
Melissa Kaan ◽  
Claire Holloway ◽  
Julie Gilbert ◽  
Vicky Simanovski ◽  
Garth Matheson
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Patient Experience ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Diagnostic Process ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
The Past ◽  
Rule Out

115 Background: For many patients going through diagnostic testing for cancer, the time from suspicion to diagnosis or rule-out, can be a confusing and anxious time. In 2007, Cancer Care Ontario began investing in the implementation of diagnostic assessment programs (DAPs) across Ontario, Canada to improve the quality of care during the diagnostic phase of lung cancer. DAPs consist of multidisciplinary healthcare teams that manage and coordinate a patient’s diagnostic care from testing to a definitive diagnosis. The objectives of the DAPs are to: 1) decrease time from suspicion to diagnosis or resolution; 2) optimize the patient’s experience during the diagnostic process; 3) optimize satisfaction and experience among primary care providers and specialists; and 4) provide a sustainable solution by offering good value for money. Today over 35,000 patients have been diagnosed in one of the 18 lung DAPs that exist across the province. Methods: The implementation of DAPs featured the introduction of a patient navigator to act as the primary point of contact for patients, improve the patient experience and ensure their patients were progressing through any required diagnostic imaging and consultations in a timely manner. Cancer Care Ontario also engaged with primary care providers to refer patients with findings suspicious for lung cancer to DAPs as early as possible to ensure they benefited from organized assessment. Cancer Care Ontario has collected patient level data to measure wait times and implemented a patient survey to assess patient experience. Results: In the past five years, the median wait time from referral to a lung DAP to diagnosis or rule out has decreased by 19% to 24 days and the 90th %tile has decreased by 28% to 51 days. The large majority of patients have had a positive experience with their DAPs, with 95% of patients scoring their experience in the diagnostic process as “good” or “excellent”. Conclusions: The implementation of DAPs across the province is seen as a valuable component of quality of care by improving the diagnostic phase of cancer. The sustainability of the DAP model is demonstrated by the continued improvements in access and maintained patient experience in spite of growing volumes (91% increase in the past five years).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document