GPs may help people at risk of self-harm by asking open questions, acknowledging distress, and exploring positive reasons for staying alive

2021 ◽  
Crisis ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 211-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinod Singaravelu ◽  
Anne Stewart ◽  
Joanna Adams ◽  
Sue Simkin ◽  
Keith Hawton

Abstract. Background: The Internet is used by young people at risk of self-harm to communicate, find information, and obtain support. Aims: We aimed to identify and analyze websites potentially accessed by these young people. Method: Six search terms, relating to self-harm/suicide and depression, were input into four search engines. Websites were analyzed for access, content/purpose, and tone. Results: In all, 314 websites were included in the analysis. Most could be accessed without restriction. Sites accessed by self-harm/suicide search terms were mostly positive or preventive in tone, whereas sites accessed by the term ways to kill yourself tended to have a negative tone. Information about self-harm methods was common with specific advice on how to self-harm in 15.8% of sites, encouragement of self-harm in 7.0%, and evocative images of self-harm/suicide in 20.7%. Advice on how to get help was given in 56.1% of sites. Conclusion: Websites relating to suicide or self-harm are easily accessed. Many sites are potentially helpful. However, a significant proportion of sites are potentially harmful through normalizing or encouraging self-harm. Enquiry regarding Internet use should be routinely included while assessing young people at risk.


1979 ◽  
Vol 17 (20) ◽  
pp. 78-80

The patient who is in hospital after an episode of deliberate self-harm is at risk both of non-fatal repetition (20% in the following year) and of successful suicide later (1–2% in the next year).8 9 Most patients admitted to hospital after self-poisoning are under 25, living unharmoniously with others and nearly all show personality difficulties rather than mental illness.10 11 This article attempts to guide the hospital doctor in the assessment and treatment of such patients.


2000 ◽  
Vol 176 (2) ◽  
pp. 126-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane Hurry ◽  
Pamela Storey

BackgroundMany young people who harm themselves have chronic mental health or social problems or are at risk of future self-harm or even suicide. The accident and emergency (A&E) clinic is an important gateway to treatment.AimsTo describe the psychosocial assessment of 12- to 24-year-old patients attending A&E clinics following deliberate self-harm (DSH) and to identify features of service management and provision which maximise specialist assessment.MethodA postal questionnaire was sent to a sample of one in three A&E departments in England. In a representative sample of 18 of these hospitals, staff were interviewed and 50 case notes per hospital were examined.ResultsPsychosocial assessment by non-specialist doctors in A&E departments tended to be of variable quality, focused on short-term risk. Around 43% of patients aged 12–24 were assessed by a specialist; specialist assessment was associated with high admission rates and the presence of on-site psychiatric departments and DSH teams.ConclusionsYoung DSH patients at risk often go unidentified; as a result their psychological problems may not be treated. Hospitals are frequently unaware of the proportion of patients discharged without adequate assessment.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 295-297
Author(s):  
Charlie Waller

A guide from the University of Oxford and the Charlie Waller Memorial Trust offers practical ways in which schools can support young people at risk from self-harm, which school nurses can share with school staff members to help them respond.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. e195463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofie Westling ◽  
Daiva Daukantaite ◽  
Sophie I. Liljedahl ◽  
Youngha Oh ◽  
Åsa Westrin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  

2018 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. 119-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andres G. Viana ◽  
Emma C. Woodward ◽  
Elizabeth M. Raines ◽  
Abigail E. Hanna ◽  
Michael J. Zvolensky

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Aysha Mendes

Maintaining good mental health has become a high-priority topic of discussion, but guidance around an emergency situation is still lacking. Continuing her column on mental health in care homes, Aysha Mendes offers some effective and practical solutions to help care professionals and residents.


2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 515-532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexis Harris ◽  
Elizabeth Stanley

At-Risk Units (ARUs) are dedicated facilities established in New Zealand prisons to assist those considered to be ‘at risk’ of self-harm or suicide. Their remit is ostensibly care-based and rights-conscious, with authorities noting that ARUs preserve the ‘right to life’. Drawing upon research within two correctional sites, alongside analysis of recent documents from oversight bodies and courts, this article considers ARU operations. It is argued that, all too often, ARUs have undermined humane practices towards suicidal or ‘at-risk’ prisoners. Four problems are apparent: (1) ARUs are misused and overused in such a way that secure punishment, rather than care, is prioritized; (2) within a context of ‘lesser eligibility’, ARUs operationalize degrading conditions and treatments towards prisoners; (3) humane treatments are further diminished by a correctional approach to prioritize legal or bureaucratic compliance; and (4) authorities avoid institutional sanction for prisoner harms or deaths, particularly through an emphasis on personal responsibilization or blame. The end-result is that ARUs are regularly operationalized in ways that exacerbate risks and diminish rights for prisoners. A question remains about their fundamental use as an appropriate response to those who suffer mental health distress within penal environments.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document