scholarly journals Sobre la importancia del método en la formación filosófica.

Protrepsis ◽  
2017 ◽  
pp. 19-42
Author(s):  
José Alfonso Villa Sánchez
Keyword(s):  
Martin Heidegger ◽  
Friedrich Nietzsche ◽  
Ludwig Wittgenstein ◽  
David Hume ◽  
Karl Marx ◽  
Soren Kierkegaard ◽  
Max Horkheimer ◽  
Hans Georg Gadamer

La formación profesional en filosofía debe poner la misma atención al contenido de los filósofos estudiados que al método del que dichos filósofos se valen, pues unas ideas se dejan expresar de unos modos mejor que de otros, y unos problemas filosóficos reclaman ser tratados más con un género literario que con otro. De manera que el método en filosofía no es un asunto menor en la formación del profesional de la filosofía. El presente estudio profundiza en el método utilizado por algunos pensadores consagrados en la historia de la filosofía, tomando como ejemplo algún fragmento significativo de su producción. Se trata de autores de la talla de Platón, Santo Tomás de Aquino y Søren Kierkegaard, David Hume, Friedrich Nietzsche y Ludwig Wittgenstein, Karl Marx y el trabajo conjunto de Max Horkheimer y Theodor W. Adorno, Martin Heidegger y Hans-Georg Gadamer.

Narratives of Decadence in Post-Kantian Philosophy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Huddleston
Keyword(s):  
Martin Heidegger ◽  
Friedrich Nietzsche ◽  
Focus Of Attention ◽  
Max Horkheimer ◽  
Theodor Adorno ◽  
European Philosophy ◽  
Nineteenth And Twentieth Centuries ◽  
Kantian Philosophy ◽  
Point Of Reference

Decadence is a perennial theme in philosophy. But tracing the arc of decline becomes an especially prominent focus of attention in European philosophy in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. This article explains and contrasts several “narratives of decadence” in the post-Kantian tradition. The article first lays out briefly the basics of G. W. F. Hegel’s optimistic view of progress and history as a foil and point of reference, then turns to expounding several narratives of decadence from other canonical philosophical figures in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries—specifically, from Friedrich Nietzsche, from Martin Heidegger, and from Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer. All of these thinkers see modern humanity as being, in some (often quite nuanced) sense, in a decadent state, but all have a rather different diagnosis of what that fallen state consists of, and of how (or whether) we might be able to extricate ourselves from it.

Klossowski, Pierre (1905–2001)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalja Chestopalova
Keyword(s):  
Martin Heidegger ◽  
Friedrich Nietzsche ◽  
Ludwig Wittgenstein ◽  
Walter Benjamin ◽  
Franz Kafka ◽  
Georges Bataille ◽  
Rainer Maria Rilke ◽  
Andre Gide ◽  
Pierre Klossowski ◽  
André Gide

French philosopher, writer, artist and translator Pierre Klossowski was born in Paris and raised in Switzerland, Germany and France. His education was influenced by Rainer Maria Rilke (1875–1926) and André Gide (1869–1951). A friend of Georges Bataille (1897–1962), Walter Benjamin (1892–1940) and Pierre-Jean Jouve (1887–1976), Klossowski produced French translations of works by Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900), Franz Kafka (1883–1924), Martin Heidegger (1889–1976) and Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889–1951) from German, and of the works of Suetonius, Virgil, Augustine and Tertullian from Latin.

scholarly journals Pragmatism and Existential Philosophy

2010 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 106-118
Author(s):  
Hans Lipps ◽  
Jason Hills
Keyword(s):  
Lived Experience ◽  
Martin Heidegger ◽  
Friedrich Nietzsche ◽  
John Dewey ◽  
Soren Kierkegaard ◽  
William James ◽  
Existential Philosophy

Hans Lipps compares pragmatism (William James and John Dewey) existentialism (Friedrich Nietzsche, Soren Kierkegaard, and Martin Heidegger) in this 1936 article translated from French.  He claims that they aim at the same goals, e.g., a return to lived experience and a rejection of the Cartesian legacy in philosophy.  While summarizing the commonalities of each, he engages in a polemic against philosophy then that remains relevant now into the next century.

scholarly journals O SILÊNCIO DE FILEBO

Sapere Aude ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (19) ◽  
pp. 93-103
Author(s):  
Rafael Leopoldo
Keyword(s):  
Martin Heidegger ◽  
Friedrich Nietzsche ◽  
Mode De Vie ◽  
De Se ◽  
Hans Georg Gadamer

O presente artigo é uma reflexão sobre o diálogo Filebo, de Platão. Nossa temática, a propósito dessa obra, é a função do silêncio de Filebo. Para esta análise, percorremos dois filósofos: o francês Michel Onfray, na Contra-história da filosofia, e o alemão Hans-Georg Gadamer em A ideia do bem entre Platão e Aristóteles. Em cada um desses filósofos, vamos ter uma compreensão diferente do diálogo de Platão e, portanto, da questão do silêncio do personagem principal. Nessa ponderação, Michel Onfray apresenta toda sua aliança com o pensamento de Friedrich Nietzsche. Hans-Georg Gadamer, por sua vez, apresenta sua afinidade teórica com o pensamento de Martin Heidegger. Dessa forma, o silêncio pode ser compreendido tanto como uma positivação de um hedonismo (a visão de Onfray-Nietzsche) quanto um rechaço à positivação do saber hermenêutico (Gadamer-Heidegger). Por último, nós abordamos uma terceira possibilidade interpretativa que é a da impossibilidade de se viver ao modo filosófico.PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Filebo. Diálogo. Democracia. Silêncio. RÉSUMÉCet article est une réflexion sur le dialogue Philebus de Platon. Notre thème, à propos de cet ouvrage, est celui de la fonction du silence de son personnage principal. Pour l’analyser, nous parcourons deux philosophes: le français Michel Onfray dans son livre Contre-histoire de la philosophie, et l’allemand Hans-Gerog Gadamer enL'Idée du bien comme enjeu platonico-aristotélicien. Chez chacun de ces philosophes, nous aurons une compréhension différente du dialogue de Platon et, par conséquent, de la question du silence du personnage principal. Dans cette considération, Michel Onfray présente toute son alliance avec la pensée de Friedrich Nietzsche. Hans-Georg Gadamer, à son tour, montre son affinité théorique avec la pensée de Martin Heidegger. De cette manière, le silence peut être aussi compris comme une positivation d'un hédonisme (la vision d’Onfray-Nietzsche) que comme un rejet de la positivation du savoir herméneutique (Gadamer-Heidegger). Enfin, nous apportons une troisième possibilité d’interprétation du mutisme de Philebus qui consiste à comprendre l’impossibilité du mode de vie philosophique.MOTS-CLES: Philebus. Dialogue. Démocratie. Silence

scholarly journals Materialism de Terry Eagleton

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 466-472
Author(s):  
Carla Baute
Keyword(s):  
Friedrich Nietzsche ◽  
Ludwig Wittgenstein ◽  
Karl Marx

Materialism (2017) é a obra mais recente de Terry Eagleton (1943-), um dos críticos culturais mais influentes da Grã-Bretanha nos dias atuais. No livro, o autor discute os Materialismos de Karl Marx, Friedrich Nietzsche e Ludwig Wittgenstein. No decorrer de cinco breves capítulos, traça distanciamentos e semelhanças entre essas propostas. São tomados como temas centrais a relação do ser humano com seu corpo, com a natureza, com a linguagem e o autoconhecimento.

Friend as Enemy

2018 ◽  
pp. 54-69
Author(s):  
Rastislav Dinić
Keyword(s):  
Martin Heidegger ◽  
Friedrich Nietzsche ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Ludwig Wittgenstein ◽  
Ralph Waldo Emerson ◽  
Richard Rorty ◽  
Constitutional Democracy ◽  
Stanley Cavell ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Difference

Richard Rorty famously claimed that the difference between analytic and continental philosophers, boils down to a political one—analytical philosophers are predominantly liberals who share a belief in the rule of law and the institutions of modern constitutional democracy, while the continental ones tend to be more pessimistic about this political arrangement, and much more prone to experiment with the alternatives. But where does this leave the members of that rare breed—philosophers who see themselves as working in both traditions? In order to answer that question for himself, Rorty has written several books proclaiming his faith in liberalism and America as its most prominent example. But what about Stanley Cavell—a philosopher inspired equally by Ludwig Wittgenstein, J.L. Austen, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Friedrich Nietzsche and Martin Heidegger? It is difficult to answer this question straightforwardly, since, although many of his writings are in some sense deeply political, Cavell rarely wrote explicitly on politics, especially in respect of modern ideological struggles. One way someone interested in this question could go about trying to answer it is by turning to Cavell’s encounters with more explicit representatives of certain ideological positions. That is exactly what I intend to do in this paper—by turning to Cavell’s engagement with Yugoslav director Dušan Makavejev.

Introduction: Plato’s Nightmare

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Marmysz
Keyword(s):  
Immanuel Kant ◽  
Martin Heidegger ◽  
Friedrich Nietzsche ◽  
Objective Reality

This introductory chapter examines the “problem” of nihilism, beginning with its philosophical origins in the ideas of Plato, Immanuel Kant, Friedrich Nietzsche and Martin Heidegger. It is argued that film is an inherently nihilistic medium involving the evocation of illusory worlds cut loose from objective reality. This nihilism of film is distinguished from nihilism in film; the nihilistic content also present in some (but not all) movies. Criticisms of media nihilism by authors such as Thomas Hibbs and Darren Ambrose are examined. It is then argued, contrary to such critics, that cinematic nihilism is not necessarily degrading or destructive. Because the nihilism of film encourages audiences to linger in the presence of nihilism in film, cinematic nihilism potentially trains audiences to learn the positive lessons of nihilism while remaining safely detached from the sorts of dangers depicted on screen.

scholarly journals Lazos sociales contemporáneos y capitalismo: el analista en un mundo de “letosas”

2015 ◽  
pp. 163-175
Author(s):  
Martín Alomo
Keyword(s):  
Martin Heidegger ◽  
Jacques Lacan ◽  
Karl Marx

<p>Nos proponemos establecer el recorrido teórico que permita reconstruir la noción de letosa, formulada por Jacques Lacan en el seminario El reverso del psicoanálisis. Comenzaremos por situar las condiciones del sujeto que se desprende del cogito cartesiano, y el particular modo en que se imbrica con el surgimiento del capitalismo tecnológico; para ello, recurrimos a elaboraciones de Martin Heidegger. Luego se tomarán algunos pasajes de El capital, de Karl Marx, para situar allí el concepto de plusvalía, en el que Lacan apoya su noción de plus de goce. Por último, se analizará la función de las letosas en relación con la posición del analista.</p>

scholarly journals Ser sí mismo auténtico. Existencia, facticidad e instante

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 91-109
Author(s):  
María Cielo Aucar
Keyword(s):  
Martin Heidegger ◽  
Soren Kierkegaard

Desde una perspectiva ontológico-existencial, el artículo pretende poner en evidencia algunos de los rasgos constitutivos del ser sí mismo auténtico en el pensamiento de Søren Kierkegaard y su respectiva recepción en la obra temprana de Martin Heidegger, específicamente Sein und Zeit. Para ello se propone, en primer lugar, llevar a cabo el análisis fenomenológico-hermenéutico de la noción kierkegaardiana de sí mismo como espíritu, así como de la noción heideggeriana de Dasein, para concluir en un diálogo crítico-hermenéutico entre ambos pensadores en torno a tal cuestión.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document