scholarly journals INVESTMENT AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN ENTREPRENEURSHIP

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tetyana Konstantynova ◽  
Tetyana Savchenko
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Small Businesses ◽  
Physical Capital ◽  
Market Demand ◽  
Firm Level ◽  
Innovation Potential ◽  
New Business ◽  
Knowledge Intensive

The knowledge-intensive enterprises have a fundamental role in the world economy. To stay competitive, businesses need to constantly create new knowledge. The businesses have certain advantages over large corporate structures: they are able to respond quickly to the changing market demand, they are flexible in organizational terms and often have the effective internal communications. As a result, small businesses can more easily incorporate the new working methods and processes into their operations and therefore be innovative. The purpose of intellectual property law is to stimulate the innovation. In summary, the accumulation of physical capital alone will not be sufficient to support development in a new economy and new global competition. Enterprises must achieve a higher trajectory of technological capabilities and competitiveness. Such a qualitative transformation should be based on the formation of knowledge that is driven by innovation, driven by shared connections and supported by lifelong learning. The main purpose of the study is to analyze the state of investment in innovation in enterprises in Ukraine and the protection of intellectual property rights. Intellectual property (IP) systems can be crucial in helping new businesses transform their innovation potential and creativity into market value and competitiveness. Intellectual property rights (IPR) allow innovative entrepreneurs to protect their inventions. They can also perform many other functions, such as signalling current and future value to investors, competitors and partners, accessing knowledge markets and networks, and preventing competitors from patenting related inventions. However, IP systems can also hinder the development of entrepreneurial ideas and hinder the dissemination of knowledge and innovation. Firm-level evidence suggests a positive correlation between patenting and new business growth, access to venture capital, and survival. The data show a huge increase in patent applications over the last decade, which differs significantly in the share of young patent firms in different countries.

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KARYA SENI BATIK YANG BELUM TERDAFTAR MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 28 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG HAK CIPTA

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Inggrit Fernandes
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Rapid Growth ◽  
Economic Value ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Property Law ◽  
Market Demand ◽  
Work Of Art

Batik artwork is one of the treasures of the nation's cultural heritage. Batik artwork is currently experiencing rapid growth. The amount of interest and market demand for this art resulted batik artwork became one of the commodities in the country and abroad. Thus, if the batik artwork is not protected then the future can be assured of a new conflict arises in the realm of intellectual property law. Act No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright has accommodated artwork batik as one of the creations that are protected by law. So that this work of art than as a cultural heritage also have economic value for its creator. Then how the legal protection of the batik artwork yaang not registered? Does this also can be protected? While in the registration of intellectual property rights is a necessity so that it has the force of law to the work produced

How the introduction of late season sweet cherry cultivars and changing demand conditions impacted industry competitiveness: Evidence from British Columbia

2007 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-113
Author(s):  
Richard Carew ◽  
Norman E Looney
Keyword(s):  
British Columbia ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Plant Breeding ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Sweet Cherry ◽  
Export Price ◽  
Market Demand ◽  
Plant Breeding Program ◽  
Sweet Cherry Cultivars

This paper discusses the importance of government research and innovation policies designed to reflect changing demand conditions and strengthen competitiveness of the British Columbia (BC) sweet cherry industry. Canadian plant breeding programs have responded to market demand by releasing cultivars that have extended the marketing season and resulted in higher export price premiums earned in European and Asian markets. Stronger Canadian intellectual property rights (IPR) legislation has facilitated the commercialization of a range of cultivars with valuable attributes. However, the combination of Canada being a net importer of sweet cherries and the rapid adoption of BC cultivars by Washington State orchardists has challenged Canadian policy makers to implement IPR policies that can contribute to maximizing royalty returns and sustain the Canadian plant breeding program. Key words: Sweet cherry cultivars, plant breeding, intellectual property rights

scholarly journals PENYULUHAN HUKUM TENTANG PENTINGNYA HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL PADA KELOMPOK TENUN TRADISIONAL “BIA BEREK” DI DESA KUNERU – ATAMBUA (NTT)

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie Selvie Sinaga
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Small Businesses ◽  
Industrial Design ◽  
Woven Fabrics ◽  
Human Thought ◽  
Urban Village ◽  
Or Groups ◽  
Group Members

Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) is a set of rights granted to exploit an object that is the result of human thought. IPR consists of various rights including copyright, trademark, patent, industrial design, and trade secrets. These rights are needed in developing a business, both large and small businesses. Legal counselling on the importance of IPR was given to the "Bia Berek" group consisting of mothers of traditional weaving craftsmen from the Kemak tribe in Kuneru village, Manumutin Urban Village, Atambua District, Belu Regency (East Nusa Tenggara (NTT)) in August 2018. As small businesses in traditional industries, an introduction to the importance of IPR for this group is given so that they can protect the object of intellectual property rights owned and utilize the IPR to advance their small businesses. After legal counselling is carried out, group members understand that their creativity in making woven fabrics is one of the assets protected by copyright and plagiarism of fabric motifs from other regions or groups is not permitted in the copyright regime. In addition, group members understand that a brand is needed to be able to market their woven fabrics more broadly. However, they are still unable to register their weaving work to obtain brand protection, industrial design, and IG, due to their limited funds, knowledge and access. There needs to be further assistance from the Regency Government regarding this IPR issueABSTRAK:Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI) adalah serangkaian hak yang diberikan untuk mengeksploitasi suatu obyek yang merupakan hasil dari pemikiran manusia. HKI terdiri dari berbagai hak di antaranya hak cipta, merek, paten, desain industri, dan rahasia dagang.  Hak-hak ini sangat dibutuhkan dalam mengembangkan suatu usaha, baik usaha besar atau pun kecil. Penyuluhan hukum akan pentingnya HKI ini diberikan kepada kelompok “Bia Berek” yang beranggotakan ibu-ibu pengrajin tenun tradisional dari  suku Kemak di desa Kuneru, Kelurahan Manumutin, Kecamatan Kota Atambua, Kabupaten Belu (Nusa Tenggara Timur (NTT)) pada bulan Agustus 2018. Sebagai pelaku usaha kecil di industri tradisional, pengenalan akan arti pentingnya HKI bagi kelompok ini diberikan agar mereka dapat melindungi obyek hak kekayaan intelektual yang dimiliki dan memanfaatkan HKI tersebut untuk memajukan usaha kecil mereka. Setelah penyuluhan hukum dilakukan, anggota kelompok memahami bahwa kreatifitas mereka dalam membuat kain tenunan merupakan salah satu asset yang dilindungi oleh hak cipta dan penjiplakan motif kain tenun dari daerah atau kelompok lain merupakan hal yang tidak diperkenankan dalam rezim hak cipta. Selain itu, anggota kelompok memahami bahwa diperlukan merek untuk dapat memasarkan lebih luas lagi kain hasil tenunan mereka. Namun, mereka masih belum mampu mendaftarkan karya tenun mereka untuk mendapatkan perlindungan merek, desain industri, dan IG, karena keterbatasan dana, pengetahuan dan akses mereka. Perlu ada pendampingan lebih lanjut dari pihak Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten terkait masalah HKI ini

scholarly journals Owner-managed closed it companies in croatia

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 1685-1726
Author(s):  
Jasmina Mutabžija
Keyword(s):  
Information Technology ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Protection ◽  
Information Technology Industry ◽  
Important Ingredient ◽  
Technology Industry ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Knowledge Intensive

Intellectual property protection is an important ingredient in the market success of knowledge-intensive enterprises operating in the information technology industry. The governance and the extent of protection of intellectual property related to software often seem to be connected to certain characteristics of an enterprise, such as its type and size. By analyzing the publicly available data, the author identifies various patterns primarily concerning the structure of ownership and management of the software enterprises in Croatia. The analysis reveals that all of the top 500 software enterprises according to revenue are closed, with the overwhelming majority being owner-managed and small or micro-sized. This would suggest that most software enterprises in Croatia are passive when it comes to their intellectual property. In relation to this, the author describes three profiles of enterprises depending on their attitude towards the governance of intellectual property. The author also formulates and explores four possible complementary approaches to the protection of intellectual property, both legal and non-legal, in addition to discussing various types of intellectual property rights with the aim of identifying those that are more suitable for the protection of different types of software.

scholarly journals Diseminasi Implementasi HKI di Lingkungan Civitas Akademika Sebagai Representasi Peningkatan Kualitas Bangsa

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rochmawati
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Capital ◽  
Direct Action ◽  
Action Learning ◽  
Physical Capital ◽  
Education For All ◽  
Quality Development ◽  
Watch List

Modal intellectual capital lebih penting dan strategis fungsinya bila dibandingkan dengan physical capital. Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI) dewasa ini merupakan alat yang ampuh dalam upaya peningkatan kualitas bangsa (a powerful tool for quality development). HKI merupakan hak atas kekayaan yang timbul karena kemampuan intelektual manusia. Terjaminnya suatu perlindungan hukum bagi suatu hasil karya, akan menumbuhkembangkan semangat dan kreatifitas untuk berkarya dan mencipta.Indonesia Sebagai salah satu negara yang turut serta meratifikasi Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement (TRIPS Agreement) harus tunduk atas ketentuan mengenai HKI. Namun Saat ini masih digolongkan dalam Priority Watch List dari Amerika Serikat, dikarenakan tingkat pembajakan dalam bidang HKI yang begitu tinggi ( Wikipedia 2009). Tingginya tingkat piracy dan adanya claim budaya Indonesia oleh Negara lain merupakan masalah krusial yang harus segera ditindaklanjuti. Hal tersebut menunjukkan indikasi bahwa implementasi HKI di Indonesia masih kurang maksimal.Diseminasi Implementasi HKI di lingkungan Civitas akademika merupakan hal urgent yang harus dilaksanakan. Perguruan tinggi merupakan lingkungan praktisi akademisi yang sangat kompeten dalam implementasi HKI. Selama ini peran Perguruan Tinggi dalam mengembangkan hak kekayaan intelektual di Indonesia dirasakan masih sangat kurang. Penyebab utama rendahnya perolehan Paten dipengaruhi oleh: (1)Kurangnya diseminasi di lingkungan perguruan tinggi mengenai HKI khususnya bagi mahasiswa; (2) Rendahnya animo civitas mahasiswa trekait dengan rumitnya birokrasi dalam usaha pengaplikasian Hak Paten; dan (3) Mahalnya biaya pematenan.Strategi pencapaian sasaran diseminasi HKI di lingkungan civitas akademika pada dasarnya tidak hanya melibatkan komponen perguruan tinggi saja, melainkan segenap komponen lain yang terkait dalam proses diseminasi HKI tersebut. Proses diseminasi harus melibatkan segenap stakeholder, meliputi: (1) civitas akademika, (2) aparat penegak hukum; (3) masyarakat (pemakai dan pencipta); (4) pemerintah; dan (5) kalangan pers. Upaya diseminasi perlu dilakukan oleh semua stakeholder secara sistematis, terarah dan berkelanjutan. Selain itu target audience dari kegiatan sosialisasi tersebut harus dengan jelas teridentifikasi dalam setiap bentuk diseminasi, seperti diskusi ilmiah untuk kalangan akademisi, perbandingan sistem hukum dan pelaksanaannya bagi aparat dan praktisi hukum.Bentuk diseminasi implementasi HKI meliputi: (1)Diseminasi bertahap, bertingkat, dan berkelanjutan, bentuk diseminasi dilakukan tidak hanya sekali melainkan terus-menerus melalui berbagai even formal maupun non formal, baik secara rutin terencana maupun temporer menurut pertimbangan urgensinya; (2) implementasi pengalaman aplikatif (direct action learning) sebagai suatu pendekatan aksi dan refleksi secara terus menerus; dan (3) regulasi dan mekanisme penganggaran biaya secara jelas didasarkan pada konsep pendidikan untuk semua (education for all) dengan mengoptimalkan kerjasama dengan masyarakat luas guna kontribusi peningkatan kualitas bangsa.

Protection and Promotion of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) for Economic Competitiveness and Growth

2022 ◽  
pp. 147-156
Author(s):  
Puneet Kumar ◽  
Abdul Sattar A. Al-Ausi
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Economic Development ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Small Businesses ◽  
Technology Intelligence ◽  
Economic Competitiveness ◽  
The World

The intellectual property they possess of an innovative technological invention that they have created is the only thing that matters to certain small businesses. IPR has genuinely grown as an “intellectual currency,” aiding in the advancement of global economic development, corporate prosperity, and creativity. In many fields of technology, intelligence, and culture, governments around the world are searching for ways to develop their economies, assist their people, and create national capabilities. This chapter discusses and describes the importance of intellectual property (IP) rights in achieving these vital objectives. This chapter will also offer an empirical summary of how a successful intellectual property rights regime can support or impede economic growth (IPRS).

scholarly journals Appraisal of property rights of intellectual property

2019 ◽  
pp. 33-39
Author(s):  
K. Ivanova
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Intangible Assets ◽  
Market Value ◽  
Market Demand ◽  
Legal Concept ◽  
Special Mechanism ◽  
Exclusive Property ◽  
The Law

Problem setting. The urgency of the problem is caused by the fact that active innovation processes occurring around the world, informatization of society and transformation of knowledge into a source of progress indicate that the profitability of entrepreneurial activity in a market economy to some extent depends on the ability to dispose of the results of human intellectual activity, hence the importance of intellectual property, their value is constantly increasing, which requires the implementation of a special mechanism for determining their value (appraisal). Analysis of recent researches and publications. In the scientific literature the scientists such as V.S. Drobyazko, P.M. Tsybulov, O.O. Horodov, I.M. Bieltiukova, O.M. Vinnyk, A.O. Kodynets, O.R. Kibenko, O.O. Tverezenko, V.S. Shcherbyna, I.YE. Yakubivskyy have made a significant contribution to the development of the issues on valuation of property rights of intellectual property. Target of research. To analyze the mechanism for assessing the value of such group of intangible assets as property rights of intellectual property and identify the features of this mechanism. Article’s main body. Appraisal activity is a complex institution. Appraisal of intellectual property requires the integration of the economic concept of value and the legal concept of property. But the intangible character (ideal nature) of intellectual property objects distinguishes them from other civil rights objects and becomes a certain obstacle when it comes to determining their value. When it comes to appraisal of objects of the intellectual property rights, such actions are subjected not to intangible (ideal) objects, but to exclusive property rights to them. However, the Law “On Appraisal of Property, Property Rights and Professional Appraisal Activity” considered of objects of the intellectual property rights as intangible assets that, in turn, along with things, securities, units form a broader category “property”. If the legislator had given the object of valuation the exclusive property rights and classified them as “property rights that could be valued”, it would be more in keeping with their nature. The Law “On Appraisal of Property, Property Rights and Professional Appraisal Activity” distinguishes between the market value of property and non-market types of property values (ie other types of value that are different from market value). As a general rule, the market value of objects is determined. Thus the value of property rights of intellectual property is determined by the approximate price of market demand for them. Appraisal activity is carried out in cases established by the legislation of Ukraine, international agreements, on the basis of the agreement, as well as at the request of one of the parties to the contract with the consent of the parties. The legislation defines cases when appraisal shall be mandatory. Conclusions and prospects for the development. The commercialization of intellectual property objects requires the implementation of a special mechanism for determining their value (appraisal), and the improvement of current legislation in appraisal activity field. Property rights of intellectual property belong to those, which have a monetary valuation, and must be carried out under the legislation. Valuation of property rights of intellectual property may take place, in particular, in the following cases: 1) defining the valuation of the exclusive rights transferred under the contract in intellectual property field, in particular the license contract, and defining the license fee base; 2) contribution the property rights of intellectual property to the authorized (composite) capital of certain types of companies; 3) using property rights of intellectual property in joint activities without the creation of a legal entity (including in the form of a common partnership); 4) the pledge of the property rights of intellectual property.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document