scholarly journals Tensile Bond Strength of Soft Liner to denture Base Resin Processed by two Commonly used Processing Techniques

2019 ◽  
pp. 267-270
Author(s):  
Peta Harish ◽  
T. Pavan Kumar ◽  
A. Avinash
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Strength Test ◽  
Tensile Bond Strength ◽  
Denture Base ◽  
Heat Cure ◽  
Base Resin ◽  
Soft Liner ◽  
Processing Techniques ◽  
Denture Base Resin

This study evaluated the effect of two commonly used methods of processing permanent soft liner on tensile bond strength between denture base and soft liner. Silicone based soft liner was used in this study. Ten heat cure dumbbell shaped specimens along with soft liner were processed together. Another ten heat cure dumbbell shaped specimens were fabricated and later relined with soft liner. All the specimens were subjected to tensile bond strength test. Specimens relined directly with soft liner at the time of processing the denture base resin showed significantly higher bond strength.

scholarly journals Effect of Food Simulating Agents on the Hardness and Bond Strength of a Silicone Soft Liner to a Denture Base Acrylic Resin

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 402-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.A.R. Khaledi ◽  
M. Bahrani ◽  
S. Shirzadi
Keyword(s):  
Citric Acid ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Acrylic Resin ◽  
Tensile Bond Strength ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Denture Base ◽  
Bonding Failure ◽  
Base Resin ◽  
Soft Liner ◽  
Denture Base Resin

Statement of the Problem: Bonding failure between acrylic resin and soft liner material and also gradual loss of soft liner resiliency over time are two impending challenges frequently recognized with a denture base embraced with a resilient liner. Since patients drink various beverages, it is crucial to assess the influences of these beverages on physical characteristics of soft liners. Purpose: This in vitro study envisioned to assess the influence of food simulating agents (FSA) on the hardness of a silicone soft liner by employing a Shore A durometer test and also evaluate its bond strength to a denture base resin by using tensile bond strength test. Materials and Methods: To test the hardness of samples, 50 rectangular samples (40 mm × 10 mm × 3 mm) were prepared from a heat-polymerized polymethyl methacrylate (Meliodent). Mollosil, a commercially available silicone resilient liner, was provided and applied on the specimens following the manufacturer’s directions. In order to test tensile bond strength, 100 cylindrical specimens (30 mm × 10 mm) were fabricated. The liners were added between specimens with the thicknesses of 3 mm. The specimens were divided into 5 groups (n=10) and immersed in distilled water, heptane, citric acid, and 50% ethanol. For each test, we used 10 specimens as a baseline measurement; control group. All specimens were kept in dispersed containers at 37ºC for 12 days and all solutions were changed every day. The hardness was verified using a Shore A durometer and the tensile bond strength was examined by an Instron testing machine at a cross-head speed of 5 mm/min. The records were analyzed employing one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s HSD, and LSD tests. Results: The mean tensile bond strength ± standard deviation (SD) for Mollosil was as follows for each group: 3.1 ± 0.4 (water), 1.8 ± 0.4 (citric acid), 3.0 ± 0.4 (heptane), 1.2 ± 0.3 (50% ethanol), and 3.8 ± 0.4 (control). The hardness values for each group were: 28.7 ± 2.11 (water), 33.2 ± 2.82 (citric acid), 39.2 ± 4.8 (heptane), 32.3 ± 3.56 (50% ethanol) and 22.2 ± 2.08 (control). Mean values for hardness indicated that all of the food simulating agents significantly increased hardness of the Mollosil soft liner compared to the control group (p<0.05). The results of tensile bond strength depicted that water and FSA decreased the bond strength of the soft liner -denture base resin compared to the control group and it was statistically significant (p<0.05). Conclusion: The food simulating agents could influence the mechanical properties of silicone soft liners; hence, clinicians should inform their patients concerning their possible adverse effects and complications.

The Effect of Surface Treatments on Tensile Bond Strength between a Silicone Soft Liner and a Heat-Cured Denture Base Resin

2011 ◽  
Vol 87 (9) ◽  
pp. 951-965
Author(s):  
Koray Soygun ◽  
Giray Bolayir ◽  
Arife Dogan ◽  
Hakan Demir ◽  
Orhan Murat Dogan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Tensile Bond Strength ◽  
Denture Base ◽  
Base Resin ◽  
Soft Liner ◽  
Denture Base Resin ◽  
Effect Of Surface

scholarly journals Effect of Incorporation of Silver Nanoparticles on the Tensile Bond Strength of a Long term Soft Denture Liner

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (02) ◽  
pp. 268-273
Author(s):  
Sareh Habibzadeh ◽  
Arman Omidvaran ◽  
Solmauz Eskandarion ◽  
Ahmad Reza Shamshiri
Keyword(s):  
Silver Nanoparticles ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Acrylic Resin ◽  
Analysis Data ◽  
Tensile Bond Strength ◽  
Denture Base ◽  
Heat Cure ◽  
Base Resin ◽  
Soft Liner

Abstract Objectives This study aimed at assessing the effect of the addition of silver nanoparticles (SNPs) to a silicone soft liner on its tensile bond strength to denture base resin. Materials and Methods SNPs were added to Mucopren cold cure soft liner in 0 (control), 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 wt% concentrations and bonded in 120 stainless steel molds with processed heat cure acrylic resin blocks. Liner/resin combination samples were divided into two groups. The first half was stored for 2 days in distilled water at 37°C and then subjected to tensile bond strength, while the other half were thermocycled 3000 times before testing. Mean bond strength, expressed in mega pascals (MPa), was determined in the tensile test with the use of a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min. Statistical Analysis Data were analyzed using SPSS via one-way analysis of variance test, t-test, and Tukey’s posthoc, at a 95% confidence level (p < 0.05). Results Addition of SNPs and thermocycling both caused a significant reduction in the tensile bond strength of Mucopren to acrylic resin; however, in the thermocycled group, the bond strength increased with the increase in the concentration of SNPs (p < 0.001). Conclusion Addition of SNPs to Mucopren soft silicone liner reduces its tensile bond strength to denture acrylic resin.

scholarly journals Comparison of Bond Strength of Acrylic, Composite, and Nanocomposite Artificial Teeth to Heat-Cure Acrylic Denture Base Resin

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tahereh Ghaffari Gharebagh ◽  
Fahimeh Hamedirad ◽  
Keyvan Miruzadeh
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Tooth Surface ◽  
Denture Base ◽  
Heat Cure ◽  
Base Resin ◽  
Bond Strengths ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Artificial Teeth ◽  
Denture Base Resin

Objectives: The present study aimed to evaluate the bond strength of heat-cure denture base resin to newly designed Iranian artificial acrylic teeth. Materials and Methods: In this in-vitro experimental study, shear bond strengths of Ivoclar acrylic, Apple composite, and B-Star nanocomposite teeth to heat-cure acrylic denture base resin were compared. A total of 18 samples were selected from each group of teeth. The samples were attached to heat-cure resin according to ISO 10477 standard. For the assessment of bond strength, the samples were placed in a universal testing machine and were subjected to shear forces at a speed of 1 mm/minute to record the fracture load. Descriptive statistics, including frequency, mean, and standard deviation, were calculated using SPSS 20 software. Two-way analysis of variance was used to compare the shear bond strength of the groups with and without monomers and the studied artificial teeth. Results: The mean shear bond strengths of Ivoclar acrylic teeth were 392.22±23.76 MPa and 337.11±32.18 MPa with and without adding monomers to the tooth surface, respectively. The mean shear bond strengths were 250.44±29.84 MPa and 238.33±27.28 MPa (without monomers) and 438.33±24.16 MPa and 311.56±32.78 MPa (with monomers) for Apple composite and B-Star nanocomposite artificial teeth, respectively. Conclusion: The greatest shear bond strength was attributed to Ivoclar acrylic teeth followed by Apple composite and B-Star nanocomposite artificial teeth. Addition of monomers to the tooth surface significantly strengthened the shear bonding of acrylic base resin to the teeth.

scholarly journals The Effect of Sandblasting on Bond Strength of Soft Liners to Denture Base Resins: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Fahimeh Hamedirad ◽  
Marzieh Alikhasi ◽  
Mahya Hasanzade
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
In Vitro Studies ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Denture Base ◽  
Base Resin ◽  
Soft Liner ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Denture Base Resin

Objectives. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of sandblasting on the bond strength of denture base resin to soft liners. Materials and Methods. This report follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, and OpenGrey databases were searched for in vitro studies that compared sandblasting with no treatment in terms of the tensile, shear, and peel bond strength of resilient lining materials (acrylic-based or silicone-based) to polymethyl methacrylate denture base resin. Based on the outcome, the analysis was carried out in three groups of tensile, shear, and peel bond strength. Subgroup analysis was done for the effect of size of particles on sandblasting, blasting pressure, and type of soft liner whenever possible. Heterogeneity was evaluated among the studies, and meta-analysis was performed with random effect models ( p < .05 ). Results. After screening, 16 articles met the inclusion criteria for meta-analyses. No treatment showed significantly higher tensile ( p < 0.001 ) or peel ( p = 0.04 ) bond strength, although shear bond strength of sandblasted resin was significantly better ( p = 0.008 ). Results of subgroup analyses of particle size favored the control group in 50 µ Al2O3 particle size ( p < 0.001 ). In analyses of blasting pressure, the control group had significantly better tensile bond strength than specimens with blasting pressure ≤1 bar ( p < 0.001 ) while specimens with blasting pressure beyond 1 bar showed significantly more tensile strength than control group ( p = 0.03 ). In silicon-based liners, groups without any surface treatment had significantly higher tensile bond strength ( p < 0.001 ). Conclusion. According to the in vitro studies, sandblasting would not lead to significant increase in bond strength of soft liner to the denture base resin.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document