scholarly journals ПРОБЛЕМА УДОСКОНАЛЕННЯ ПРАВОВОГО РЕГУЛЮВАННЯ ВЕБ-САЙТІВ І ДОМЕННИХ ІМЕН В УМОВАХ ІНФОРМАТИЗАЦІЇ СУСПІЛЬСТВА

2019 ◽  
pp. 73-83
Author(s):  
А. О. Гордеюк

The article analyzes the legal status of websites and domain names and scientific developments of scientists regarding the feasibility of determining them as independent objects of intellectual property.  As follows from the analysis of national legislation, some certain gaps have been defined and the ways to eliminate them have been recommended in order to improve the legal regulation of websites and domain names. The position of scholars regarding defining websites and domain names as independent objects of intellectual property in the civil law has been considered reasonable and rational, as well as adding them to article 420 of the Civil Code of Ukraine, which specifies objects of intellectual property subject to legal protection in the state. There was a suggestion to adopt a special law, which should implement legal regulation of specific objects of intellectual property that are used only in virtual space, and will provide an effective system for protecting the rights of owners of websites and domain names.

Author(s):  
Iryna I. Banasevych ◽  
Ruslana M. Heints ◽  
Mariia V. Lohvinova ◽  
Oksana S. Oliinyk

Theoretical and applied research of the features of the legal status of the subjects of civil law remains debatable today. Doctrinal and legislative analysis of this subject points to unresolved issues in this area. In particular, the provision on defining the state as a party to civil law remains controversial. There is no consensus on the definition of individuals and legal entities as subjects of civil law among scholars. Furthermore, the legal regulation of certain types of entities is somewhat unsystematic and chaotic. This is largely due to the insufficient development of theoretical issues related to the subjects of civil law. The above issues determine the relevance of the study of the features of the legal status of subjects of civil law. The purpose of the study is to investigate the features of the legal status of subjects of civil law based on doctrinal and legislative analysis. The study is based on a systematic approach, which lies in studying a complex system of relationships between subjects of civil law. Furthermore, the study is based on the laws and principles of dialectics, which contribute to the study of the legal status of the subjects of civil law. Systemic and structural-functional analysis was used to comprehensively describe the legal status of subjects of civil law. The historical method contributed to the study of the evolution of research on the subjects of civil law. The formal legal method helped identify the special features of the provisions of regulations concerning the subjects of civil law. With the help of the comparative legal method, the study analysed the provisions of the Civil Code of Ukraine in terms of regulation of subjects of civil law and such regulation was compared with other countries. The study defined the concepts and types of subjects of civil law and considered the features of the legal status of individuals, legal entities, as well as the state as a special participant of civil law. Special attention was paid to the historical analysis of the development of approaches to the definition of subjects of law, starting with Roman law


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (22) ◽  
pp. 279-285
Author(s):  
Irina Kiryushina ◽  
Andrey Serebryakov

The paper analyzes the issues of legal regulation of cross-border use of intellectual property on the example of the Eurasian Economic Union. Among the key problems of cross-border use of intellectual property within the Eurasian Economic Union (EEU) is the need to create a unified system of registration of trademarks and service marks and elimination of double registration of trademarks, establishment of common approaches to the problem of admissibility of “parallel imports” within the EEU, and the creation of an effective patent system. The authors conclude that the development of legal regulation of the use of intellectual property in cross-border relations will follow the path of adoption of normative acts within the framework of regional unions of states, taking into account the specifics of their economic and social development, as well as the way of improvement of national legislation, taking into account the position of states on this issue.


2020 ◽  
pp. 167-178
Author(s):  
Olesia Valer'evna Belaia

The object of this research is the determination of legal nature of genomic research data and their role among the objects of civil law. The subject of this research is the data of preclinical and clinical studies of pharmaceutical products, mostly those that contain biomaterial and biomedical cell products. The author underlines the problem of the absence of due legal regulation of genomic research data as the objects of law within Russian legislation, as well as protection of their rightsholders from anticompetitive use. The author reveals the possibility of recognizing genomic research data as the results of intellectual activity that are subject to legal protection as objects of intellectual property, as well as the need to enshrine them in the provisions of the Part 4 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The main conclusion consists in the substantiation of the need for protection of genomic research data as the objects of civil law. Arguments are adduced on the potential reference of genomic research as the results of intellectual activity to the objects of intellectual property. The list of data that may comprise trade secret is subjected to critical analysis. The author proposes the original classification of the results of intellectual activity as the objects of intellectual property from the perspective of the presence of creative beginning as directly invented by human, and indirectly reflecting the result of human activity. The conclusion is formulated on the independent nature of the results of genomic research as the objects of intellectual property in the form of the results of intellectual activity. The author underlines the need for protecting genomic research data as a variety of results of such tests as the know-how, as well as corresponding revision of legal definition of trade secret captured in civil legislation.


Author(s):  
Ivanna Babetska ◽  
Iryna Turchak

Purpose. This paper focuses on the definition of «legally protected interest» and clarifying questions about its structure. In this article substantiate the idea about the main role of interests in law, realize the classification by different criterion. This article is devoted finding out of question about correlation of such key normative categories as «right (equitable right)» but «legal interest», and also by a «legitimate interest». The article examines the legal nature of private and public interests in the field of intellectual property. Methodology. The methodology includes a comprehensive analysis and generalization of the available scientific and theoretical material and the formulation of appropriate conclusions and recommendations. During the research, the following methods of scientific knowledge were used: terminological, dialectical, logical-semantic, logical-normative, system-structural. Results: in the course of the research the concept of "private and public interest in intellectual property law" is defined. It is proved that private interest is defined as "the interest of individuals and social groups protected by the state", public interest is defined as "recognized by the state and secured by the interest of the social community, the satisfaction of which serves as a condition and guarantee of its existence and development." Scientific novelty. In the course of the research it was established that when it comes to ensuring the balance of public and private interests of the parties in copyright, it means, among other things, the introduction of special norms of free use of works in international and national law. The problem of interaction of private and public interests in the legal regulation of intellectual property relations requires further thorough detailed research to determine the mechanism and methods of protection of these interests. Practical importance. The results of the study can be used in law-making activities for the purpose of legal regulation of public relations in the sphere of legal protection of the brand.


Author(s):  
Iuliia Vishar

In the framework of this article, attention is drawn to the importance of legal ordering in the created domestic regulatory framework of intellectual property for medicines on the basis of international law, implemented by approximating national legislation to the norms of the European Community law system in this area. The shortcomings of the standard approaches of Ukrainian lawmaking in the intellectual pharmaceutical industry to the transformation of legal experience in the pharmaceutical industry of the European Community, generating domestic legislative eclecticism, are presented. The effect of omitting the clarity of the definitions of the basic concepts in the regulatory legal acts of the national legislation, namely: «homeopathic medicines», «confidential registration information», «independent expert», «reference medicinal product», «original (innovative ionic preparation)», «unlawful use of natural information on the safety and efficacy of a medicinal product», «a similar biological preparation (biosimilar)», on intellectual property in the pharmaceutical industry on the education of legally inferior, with protective and protective helplessness, intellectual property objects for medicines, which is a manifestation of the legal incompetence of national legislators. Indicated on the negligent attitude of domestic lawmakers to the uncertain classification of inventions in pharmaceuticals, which, like the above definitions of the concepts of intellectual property for medicines, forms a deformed regulatory framework for patenting in this area - the basis for possible offenses in the form of patent trolling, counterfeit pharmaceutical products, corruption schemes in medicine, unfair competition, falsification of drugs, etc., where, first of all First, the level of safety is leveled, as are the spines and effectiveness of drugs. At the same time, it should be noted that the lack of results of proper judicial practice in the field of intellectual property for medicinal products is an indicator of non-functioning legislative mechanisms for the transformation of the European legal system into a national regulatory framework. The importance and necessity of restoring ecological pharmacies to consolidate the system of legal regulation of the intellectual pharmaceutical industry by increasing the transparency of the pharmaceutical market and the responsibility of its participants is indicated. In our opinion, the legislation in this priority for the state strategy area should be reviewed to eliminate recurrences and contradictions based on the implemented system of monitoring, competent legal analytics and control of compliance of Ukrainian legislation with EU legislation. In turn, a well-functioning, fully documented pharmaceutical quality system must be developed that should include Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs) with quality control and risk management for quality at the stage of intelligent product creation. Thus, the underestimated pharmacy business, where extracorporeal medicines created in the conditions of individual production (manufacturing) with ensuring compliance with their purpose, the requirements of regulatory (analytical, technical, technological) documents, the State Pharmacopeia of Ukraine, and exclusion of risks for patients, may unreasonably have features patentability, based on international experience, as a manifestation of relevant medicine.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 22-25
Author(s):  
Ekaterina E. Lekanova ◽  

Despite the existence of an article in modern Russian legislation on the legal status of minor parents, many legal issues related to the implementation and protection of the rights, duties, interests of a minor parent and his child remained outside family legal regulation, which exacerbates the already difficult problem of legal protection of early parenthood. Moreover, the provisions of Article 62 of the Family Code of the Russian Federation are very inharmoniously combined with the rules of guardianship of minors. The aim of the work is to analyze the legislation on the legal status of minor parents and guardians, to identify the legal characteristics of the care of a child of minor parents. The author concludes that the features of the care of a child of minor parents, in addition to the age of one or both parents, in the case of the appointment of a guardian include: a combination of parenthood and guardianship; unequal opportunities for the care of a child by a minor parent who is not able to independently provide care, and by the legal representative of the child of the minor parent; special (additional) grounds for terminating guardianship of a child of minor parents; the need for the guardian to live together not only with the child in care, but also with his parent. The norms of paragraph 2 of article 62 of the Family Code of the Russian Federation and paragraph 2 of article 29 of the Federal law «On Guardianship and Custodianship» should be adjusted. It is proposed to introduce special rules for the selection of the guardian of a child of a minor parent, which would properly ensure the right of the minor parent to live together with the child.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 210-226
Author(s):  
D. P. Fedulkin ◽  
V. G. Zinov

The article presents an overview of public policy measures in the field of identification, consolidation and inventory of rights to the results of intellectual activity with a high potential of industrial use. Proposals for the development of mechanisms of legal protection of individual intellectual property objects are substantiated. The instructive and methodical regulation of works on registration of results of scientific and technical activity under the state contracts is analyzed. Attention is paid to the complexity of the procedure of passing and agreeing the final results of their implementation. Methodological approaches to the improvement of identification and inventory of protectable results of intellectual activity obtained in the course of execution of state contracts as part of the organization’s activities in the field of innovation and technological development in order to implement the business strategy in the domestic and global markets are proposed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-236
Author(s):  
Yevhen Leheza ◽  
Yuriy Deliya ◽  
Eduard Ryzhkov ◽  
Serhii Albul ◽  
Oleksandr Shamara

Relevant issues of the administrative and legal status of subjects of special competence in relation to public administration in the field of intellectual property are considered. Main  content. A circle of specified subjects in the system of subjects of public administration is determined. The role of subjects of special competence in the fulfilment of tasks of public administration in the sphere of intellectual property is identified. Classification of subjects of special competence regarding public administration in this field is presented. Features of the administrative or legal status of each group of subjects of special competence in relation to public administration in the field of intellectual property are analyzed. Specifics of the influence of these subjects on legal relations arising in the sphere of intellectual property are characterized. Materials and methods research based on the analysis of documentary sources. the  basis  is  the  dialectical  method  of  cognition  of  the  facts  of  social  reality,  on  which  the  formal legal and comparative legal approaches are largely based. Conclusions are drawn about the place of subjects of special competence in relation to public administration in the field of intellectual property among other subjects. Proposals on the necessity to improve current domestic legislation in the sphere of intellectual property are formulated.Keywords: Public administration; Intellectual property; Legal regulation; Relation; Sphere; Subjects of special competence Peraturan hukum status subjek kompetensi khusus dalam kaitannya dengan administrasi publik di bidang kekayaan intelektual di Ukraina  Abstrak.Masalah yang relevan dari status administrasi dan hukum mata pelajaran kompetensi khusus dalam kaitannya dengan administrasi publik di bidang kekayaan intelektual dipertimbangkan. Isi utama. Lingkaran mata pelajaran tertentu dalam sistem mata pelajaran administrasi publik ditentukan. Peran mata pelajaran kompetensi khusus dalam pemenuhan tugas administrasi publik di bidang kekayaan intelektual diidentifikasi. Klasifikasi mata pelajaran kompetensi khusus tentang administrasi publik di bidang ini disajikan. Fitur status administrasi atau hukum dari setiap kelompok mata pelajaran kompetensi khusus dalam kaitannya dengan administrasi publik di bidang kekayaan intelektual dianalisis. Spesifik pengaruh subjek ini pada hubungan hukum yang timbul di bidang kekayaan intelektual dicirikan. Bahan dan metode penelitian berdasarkan analisis sumber dokumenter. Basisnya adalah metode kognisi dialektis atas fakta-fakta realitas sosial, yang menjadi dasar sebagian besar pendekatan hukum formal dan hukum komparatif. Kesimpulan diambil tentang tempat mata pelajaran kompetensi khusus dalam kaitannya dengan administrasi publik di bidang kekayaan intelektual antara mata pelajaran lainnya. Proposal tentang perlunya meningkatkan undang-undang domestik saat ini di bidang kekayaan intelektual dirumuskan.Kata kunci: Administrasi publik, Kekayaan intelektual, Regulasi hukum, Hubungan, Lingkungan, Mata pelajaran kompetensi khusus Правовое регулирование статуса субъектов особой компетенции в отношении государственного управления в сфере интеллектуальной собственности в УкраинеАннотация Рассмотрены актуальные вопросы административно-правового статуса субъектов особой компетенции применительно к государственному управлению в сфере интеллектуальной собственности. Основное содержание. Определен круг указанных субъектов в системе субъектов государственного управления. Выявлена роль субъектов специальной компетенции в выполнении задач государственного управления в сфере интеллектуальной собственности. Представлена классификация предметов особой компетенции государственного управления в этой области. Анализируются особенности административно-правового статуса каждой группы субъектов особой компетенции применительно к государственному управлению в сфере интеллектуальной собственности. Охарактеризована специфика влияния этих субъектов на правоотношения, возникающие в сфере интеллектуальной собственности. Материалы и методы исследования на основе анализа документальных источников. в основе лежит диалектический метод познания фактов социальной действительности, на котором в значительной степени базируются формально-правовой и сравнительно-правовой подходы. Сделаны выводы о месте субъектов особой компетенции по отношению к государственному управлению в сфере интеллектуальной собственности среди других субъектов. Сформулированы предложения о необходимости совершенствования действующего украинского законодательства в области интеллектуальной собственности.Ключевые слова: Государственное управление, Интеллектуальная собственность, Правовое регулирование, Отношения, Сфера, Субъекты особой компетенции.


2021 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 7-19
Author(s):  
Jacek Borowicz

In Poland before the Second World War, the profession of patent attorney was categorised as one of the so-called liberal professions. Its legal status and rules of practice were compared to the solicitor profession. A patent attorney practiced his profession personally, independently, and autonomously. In order to exercise his profession, he ran an independent patent attorney’s office. In the second half of the 1940s, with the communists taking power in Poland, a radical transformation of the social, political, economic, and legal system of the state along the lines of Stalin’s Soviet Union began. Any social, political, or economic activities characterised by independence and autonomy were thus in axiological contradiction with the ideology of the planned totalitarian state. The Act on the Establishment of the College of Patent Attorneys passed on 20 December 1949 completely abolished the structure of the patent attorney profession as a free profession, exercised in its own name and on its own account. From that moment on, the patent attorney became a civil servant performing their professional activities under strict hierarchical subordination to his superiors. There was no guarantee of their intellectual independence or professional autonomy. The practice of the patent attorney profession was subject to public law. The Patent Attorneys College was in fact another state office. It was organisationally and financially linked to the Patent Office — an administrative body granting legal protection to objects of industrial and commercial property, collecting and making available patent documentation and literature. The president of the Patent Office supervised the Patent Attorneys College. Both the Patent Attorneys College and the Patent Office were supervised by the State Economic Planning Commission. The State Commission for Economic Planning was a kind of super-ministry, tasked with a Soviet-style mission of closely supervising and controlling the entire centralised economy of the Polish state. The chairman of the State Economic Planning Commission also had key powers to influence patent attorneys. It was he who determined the subject of their professional examination, he who appointed a person meeting the statutory requirements to the position of a patent attorney. He could also exempt a candidate for the profession from meeting the requirements as well as appoint the president of the Patent Attorneys College. The Act of 20 December 1949 was repealed with the end of the Stalinist period in Poland. In 1958, the profession of patent attorney was briefly reinstated as a free profession. After that, until the end of the existence of the socialist state called the Polish People’s Republic, patent attorneys performed their profession as employees within the meaning of the labour law. It was not until the fall of communism in Poland that the profession of a patent attorney was re-established as a liberal profession under the provisions of the Act on Patent Attorneys of 9 January 1993.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliane Martin

Crowdwork, a new and dynamic form of employment with growing importance, has been a subject of numerous legal and political discussions for some time. A central point of discussion is how a certain level of legal protection for crowdworkers can be achieved within such a model. To clarify this, the legal status of crowdworkers needs to be determined: Is a crowdworker an employee, an employee-like person / homeworker, or self-employed? In the civil law sector, there is also the question of whether a crowdworker is a consumer or an entrepreneur.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document