Using clinical dashboard for hypertension management in a family medicine clinic

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esmaeel Rahmani
Keyword(s):  
Family Medicine ◽  
Hypertension Management ◽  
Medicine Clinic

RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF THE MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION OF PATIENTS WHO APPLIED TO THE AMBULATORY OF GENERAL PRACTICE - FAMILY MEDICINE

2019 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
pp. 938-941
Author(s):  
Оlexander Ye. Kononov ◽  
Liliana V. Klymenko ◽  
Ganna V. Batsiura ◽  
Larysa F. Matiukha ◽  
Olha V. Protsiuk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Family Medicine ◽  
Middle Ages ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Medical Documentation ◽  
Aged Patients ◽  
Family Doctors ◽  
Functional Changes ◽  
Medicine Clinic ◽  
Leading Role ◽  
The Family

Introduction: In today’s realities of health care reform in Ukraine family doctors play a leading role. The aim of our work was to analyze the medical cards of patients who applied for medical care to the family medicine clinic. Materials and methods: It was analyzed outpatient medical cards of 87 patients who applied to the family medicine clinic in the Khotov village, Kyiv region. The study included people aged 18 to 60 years, which corresponded to the groups of young and middle ages according to the WHO classification. Review: Our findings indicate the prevalence of functional changes among young people: somatoform dysfunction of the autonomic nervous system - 9 (37,5%) and the development of organic manifestations at middle-aged patients: arterial hypertension - 32 (62,7%) and coronary artery disease - 17 (33,3%). Conclusions: This study is important for determining the risk groups, early diagnosis and prevention of diseases.

scholarly journals Diabetes Risk Factors and Testing in a Family Medicine Clinic

2006 ◽  
Vol 163 (suppl_11) ◽  
pp. S185-S185
Author(s):  
F.J Dallo ◽  
S.C Weller ◽  
A.R Cass
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Family Medicine ◽  
Diabetes Risk ◽  
Diabetes Risk Factors ◽  
Medicine Clinic

scholarly journals AB0801 TIME FOR REFERRAL AND DEFINITIVE DIAGNOSIS IN PATIENTS WITH HAND ARTHRALGIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1425.1-1425
Author(s):  
P. Herrera-Sandate ◽  
G. Figueroa-Parra ◽  
D. Vega-Morales ◽  
J. A. Esquivel Valerio ◽  
B. R. Vázquez Fuentes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Time Delay ◽  
Family Medicine ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Definitive Diagnosis ◽  
Official Journal ◽  
Medical Visit ◽  
Medicine Clinic ◽  
Medical Visits ◽  
Medical Quality

Background:Early referral of patients with suspicion of progression to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is of paramount importance in disease prognosis. We had previously described a time delay of 28 months between symptom onset and evaluation by a rheumatologist, and a mean wait time of 9.5 weeks for referral to a secondary-level public hospital (1). The availability of specialized interdisciplinary evaluation of patients in a third-level of care raises the possibility of shortening this time gap, as well as describing patient and physician decisions amidst the referral to a Rheumatology center.Objectives:Describe the diagnosis profile of patients with hand arthralgia and time of referral to Rheumatology in a Family Medicine clinic.Methods:A cohort study was conducted in 110 patients from October 2018 to December 2020 in a Family Medicine clinic within the tertiary-care University Hospital “Dr. Jose Eleuterio Gonzalez” in Monterrey, Mexico. Patients with hand arthralgia as their chief complaint were recruited. An observational, descriptive compilation of patient history was retrieved prospectively through medical records. Variables included time of inclusion, number of medical visits until referral and definitive diagnosis. Descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to test the association between time of diagnosis and clinical variables of interest.Results:Assessed variables are shown in Table 1. Out of 110 patients with hand arthralgia, a quarter received a final diagnosis within 3 medical visits. Less than half of patients were referred, and only a third attended the referral indication. It takes 39.3 days from the first medical visit to be referred, and 69 days and 2.89 consultations to receive a definitive diagnosis. Around half of patients will have a definitive diagnosis, osteoarthritis being the most common. The log-rank test for categoric variables including a positive squeeze test or ≥4 criteria of clinically suspect arthralgia did not show a significant association for time of referral and definitive diagnosis (data not shown).Table 1.Diagnostic and referral characteristics of patients with hand arthralgia attending a Family medicine clinicPatients recruited in a Family Medicine clinicn = 110Female, n (%)90 (81.8)Age in years, mean ± SD49.69 ± 14.90RF, ACPA, or hand radiography request, n (%)100 (90.9)Diagnosis in Family MedicineDiagnosed patients after 1 medical visit, cumulative n (%)5 (4.6)Diagnosed patients after 2 medical visits, cumulative n (%)22 (20.0)Diagnosed patients after 3 medical visits, cumulative n (%)26 (23.6)Referral to Rheumatology for diagnostic doubt or clinical follow-upPatients referred to a Rheumatology clinic, n (%)49 (44.5)Patients attending Rheumatology referral, n (%)34 (30.9)Time for referral, days ± SD39.37 ± 38.64Global definitive diagnosisPatients with a definitive diagnosis, n (%)51 (46.4)Osteoarthritis diagnosis, n (%)23 (20.9)Rheumatoid arthritis diagnosis, n (%)13 (11.8)Overlap syndrome diagnosis, n (%)5 (4.5)Time for definitive diagnosis, days ± SD68.96 ± 106.57Number of consultations for definitive diagnosis, mean ± SD2.86 ± 1.05RF, rheumatoid factor; ACPA, anticitrullinated protein antibodies; SD, standard deviation.Conclusion:Patients with hand arthralgia evaluated in a tertiary-care Rheumatology center receive a timely referral in one month and a definitive diagnosis after 3 medical visits in around two months.References:[1]Vega-Morales, D., Covarrubias-Castañeda, Y., Arana-Guajardo, A. C., & Esquivel-Valerio, J. A. (2016). Time Delay to Rheumatology Consultation: Rheumatoid Arthritis Diagnostic Concordance Between Primary Care Physician and Rheumatologist. American journal of medical quality: the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality, 31(6), 603.Graphs:Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Response to the Determine your Nutritional Health Checklist at a Family Medicine Clinic

1995 ◽  
Vol 95 (9) ◽  
pp. A29
Author(s):  
S.A. Reiter ◽  
D.W. Lillich ◽  
J.P. Thurlow ◽  
D.N. Rasmann ◽  
M. Gottleib
Keyword(s):  
Family Medicine ◽  
Medicine Clinic ◽  
Nutritional Health

scholarly journals Effect of diabetes self-management education on glycaemic control among type 2 diabetic patients at a family medicine clinic in Kenya: A randomised controlled trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine W. Gathu ◽  
Jacob Shabani ◽  
Nancy Kunyiha ◽  
Riaz Ratansi
Keyword(s):  
Family Medicine ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Educational Approach ◽  
Medicine Clinic ◽  
The Family

Background: Diabetes self-management education (DSME) is a key component of diabetes care aimed at delaying complications. Unlike usual care, DSME is a more structured educational approach provided by trained, certified diabetes educators (CDE). In Kenya, many diabetic patients are yet to receive this integral component of care. At the family medicine clinic of the Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH), Nairobi, the case is no different; most patients lack education by CDE.Aim: This study sought to assess effects of DSME in comparison to usual diabetes care by family physicians.Setting: Family Medicine Clinic, AKUH, Nairobi.Methods: Non-blinded randomised clinical trial among sub-optimally controlled (glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥ 8%) type 2 diabetes patients. The intervention was DSME by CDE plus usual care versus usual care from family physicians. Primary outcome was mean difference in HbA1c after six months of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included blood pressure and body mass index.Results: A total of 220 diabetes patients were screened out of which 140 met the eligibility criteria and were randomised. Around 96 patients (69%) completed the study; 55 (79%) in the DSME group and 41 (59%) in the usual care group. The baseline mean age and HbA1c of all patients were 48.8 (standard deviation [SD]: 9.8) years and 9.9% (SD: 1.76%), respectively. After a 6-month follow-up, no significant difference was noted in the primary outcome (HbA1c) between the two groups, with a mean difference of 0.37 (95% confidence interval: -0.45 to 1.19; p = 0.37). DSME also made no remarkable change in any of the secondary outcome measures.Conclusion: From this study, short-term biomedical benefits of a structured educational approach seemed to be limited. This suggested that offering a short, intensified education programme might have limited additional benefit above and beyond the family physicians’ comprehensive approach in managing chronic conditions like diabetes.

Outcomes of medication therapy review in a family medicine clinic

2009 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 623-627 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ila M. Harris ◽  
Sarah M. Westberg ◽  
Michael J. Frakes ◽  
James S. Van Vooren
Keyword(s):  
Family Medicine ◽  
Medication Therapy ◽  
Medicine Clinic

Urban female patients' perceptions of the family medicine clinic as a site for abortion care

Contraception ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 174-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan E. Rubin ◽  
Emily M. Godfrey ◽  
Miriam Shapiro ◽  
Marji Gold
Keyword(s):  
Family Medicine ◽  
Female Patients ◽  
Medicine Clinic ◽  
Abortion Care ◽  
The Family ◽  
A Site
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document