scholarly journals Analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans rpc-1 gene

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Qun Zheng
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Promoter Activity ◽  
Rna Polymerase Iii ◽  
Transgenic Animals ◽  
Rna Polymerases ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Pol I ◽  
Genes Encoding ◽  
Pol Iii

In eukaryotes, two large subunits form the core catalytic structure of RNA polymerase III (Pol III), which is conserved in other RNA polymerases, Pol I and Pol II. It has been found that Pol III activity is tightly associated to cell growth. TFIII B has been shown to be one of main mediators in this process. No regulation of the Pol III largest subunit gene has been found. In C. elegans, the rpc-1 gene encodes the largest subunit of Pol III. Here, I identified two critical structural components of RPC-1, Gly644 and Gly1055, whose mutations result in larval lethal arrestment. These two amino acid residues are universally conserved in RNA polymerases, indicating their overall involvement in gene transcription mechanism. Also, I found that maternally inherited, not embryonically expressed, rpc-1 gene products survive early development. Starvation was found to suppress rpc-1 gene expression and re-feeding treatment enhances rpc-1 gene expression rapidly. No similar regulation was detected in genes encoding largest subunits of Pol I and Pol II. This is the first time that rpc-1 gene regulation has been reported. Insulin signaling may not be involved in this regulation. Also, I found that rpc-1 promoter is not ubiquitously active in C. elegans. Using the rpc-1p::gfp transgene, the rpc-1 promoter activity is only detected in a subset of neurons in the head and the tail and the intestine. While starvation silences the rpc-1 promoter activity in most tissues and cells, ASK neurons still show GFP staining in the rpc-1p::gfp transgenic animals, indicating that rpc-1 transcription in ASK neurons is continuously active under starvation conditions. Further studies suggest that TGF-[beta] signaling is involved in mediating the rpc-1 promoter activity in ASK neurons.

The phylogenetic relations of DNA-dependent RNA polymerases of archaebacteria, eukaryotes, and eubacteria

1989 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfram Zillig ◽  
Hans-Peter Klenk ◽  
Peter Palm ◽  
Gabriela Pühler ◽  
Felix Gropp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Genome ◽  
Distance Matrix ◽  
Gene Organization ◽  
Amino Acid Sequences ◽  
Rna Polymerases ◽  
Matrix Analysis ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Phylogenetic Relations ◽  
Pol I ◽  
Pol Iii

Unrooted phylogenetic dendrograms were calculated by two independent methods, parsimony and distance matrix analysis, from an alignment of the derived amino acid sequences of the A and C subunits of the DNA-dependent RNA polymerases of the archaebacteria Sulfolobus acidocaldarius and Halobacterium halobium with 12 corresponding sequences including a further set of archaebacterial A + C subunits, eukaryotic nuclear RNA polymerases, pol I, pol II, and pol III, eubacterial β′ and chloroplast β′ and β″ subunits. They show the archaebacteria as a coherent group in close neighborhood of and sharing a bifurcation with eukaryotic pol II and (or) pol IIIA components. The most probable trees show pol IA branching off from the tree separately at a bifurcation with the eubacterial β′ lineage. The implications of these results, especially for understanding the possibly chimeric origin of the eukaryotic nuclear genome, are discussed.Key words: transcription, evolution, taxonomy, subunits, gene organization.

Small nuclear RNA genes transcribed by either RNA polymerase II or RNA polymerase III in monocot plants share three promoter elements and use a strategy to regulate gene expression different from that used by their dicot plant counterparts

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 5910-5919
Author(s):  
S Connelly ◽  
C Marshallsay ◽  
D Leader ◽  
J W Brown ◽  
W Filipowicz
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Iii ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Small Nuclear Rna ◽  
Promoter Elements ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Snrna Gene ◽  
Nuclear Rna ◽  
Pol Iii

RNA polymerase (Pol) II- and RNA Pol III-transcribed small nuclear RNA (snRNA) genes of dicotyledonous plants contain two essential upstream promoter elements, the USE and TATA. The USE is a highly conserved plant snRNA gene-specific element, and its distance from the -30 TATA box, corresponding to approximately three and four helical DNA turns in Pol III and Pol II genes, respectively, is crucial for determining RNA Pol specificity of transcription. Sequences upstream of the USE play no role in snRNA gene transcription in dicot plants. Here we show that for expression of snRNA genes in maize, a monocotyledonous plant, the USE and TATA elements are essential, but not sufficient, for transcription. Efficient expression of both Pol II- and Pol III-specific snRNA genes in transfected maize protoplasts requires an additional element(s) positioned upstream of the USE. This element, named MSP (for monocot-specific promoter; consensus, RGCCCR), is present in one to three copies in monocot snRNA genes and is interchangeable between Pol II- and Pol III-specific genes. The efficiency of snRNA gene expression in maize protoplast is determined primarily by the strength of the MSP element(s); this contrasts with the situation in protoplasts of a dicot plant, Nicotiana plumbaginifolia, where promoter strength is a function of the quality of the USE element. Interestingly, the organization of monocot Pol III-specific snRNA gene promoters closely resembles those of equivalent vertebrate promoters. The data are discussed in the context of the coevolution of Pol II- and Pol III-specific snRNA gene promoters within many eukaryotic organisms.

scholarly journals Combining Protein and RNA Quantification to Evaluate Promoter Activity by Using Dual-color Fluorescent Reporting Systems

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Peng ◽  
Xin Huang ◽  
Tianfang Huang ◽  
Feng Du ◽  
Xin Cui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Gene Therapy ◽  
Promoter Activity ◽  
Eukaryotic Cells ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Rna Molecules ◽  
Rna Quantification ◽  
Dual Color ◽  
Reporting Systems ◽  
Pol Iii

Herein, a Broccoli/mCherry and an EGFP/mCherry dual-color fluorescent reporting systems have been established to quantify the promoter activity at transcription and translation level in eukaryotic cells. Based on those systems, four commonly used promoters (CMV and SV40 of Pol II and U6, H1 of Pol III) were accurately evaluated at both the transcriptional and translational levels by combining accurate protein and RNA quantification. Furthermore, we verified that Pol III promoters can induce proteins expression, and Pol II promoter can be applied to express RNA molecules with defined length by combining a self-cleaving ribozyme and an artificial poly(A) tail. The dual-color fluorescence reporting systems described here could play a significant role in evaluating other gene expression regulators for gene therapy.

scholarly journals Yeast PAF1 complex restricts the accumulation of RNA polymerase III and counters the replication stress on the transcribed genes

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pratibha Bhalla ◽  
Dipti Vernekar ◽  
Ashutosh Shukla ◽  
Benoit Gilquin ◽  
Yohann Couté ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Associated Factors ◽  
Rna Polymerase Iii ◽  
Replication Stress ◽  
Regulatory Proteins ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Adverse Conditions ◽  
Pol I ◽  
Paf1 Complex ◽  
Pol Iii

AbstractMany regulatory proteins and complexes influence transcription by RNA polymerase (pol) II. In comparison, only a few regulatory proteins are known for pol III, which transcribes mostly house-keeping and non-coding genes. Yet, pol III transcription is precisely regulated under various stress conditions like starvation. We used pol III transcription complex components TFIIIC (Tfc6), pol III (Rpc128) and TFIIIB (Brf1) as baits to identify potential interactors through mass spectrometry-based proteomics. A large interactome constituting known chromatin modifiers, factors and regulators of transcription by pol I and pol II revealed the possibility of a large number of signaling cues for pol III transcription against adverse conditions. We found one of the pol II-associated factors, Paf1 complex (PAF1C) interacts with the three baits. Its occupancy on the pol III-transcribed genes is low and not correlated with pol III occupancy. Paf1 deletion leads to higher occupancy of pol III, γ-H2A and DNA pol2 but no change in nucleosome positions. Genotoxins exposure causes pol III but not Paf1 loss from the genes. PAF1C promotes the pol III pausing and restricts its accumulation on the genes, which reduces the replication stress caused by the pol III barrier and transcription-replication conflict on these highly transcribed genes.

scholarly journals Genome-wide analyses of chromatin interactions after the loss of Pol I, Pol II and Pol III

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongpeng Jiang ◽  
Jie Huang ◽  
Kehuan Lun ◽  
Boyuan Li ◽  
Haonan Zheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Chromatin Accessibility ◽  
Rna Polymerases ◽  
Chromatin Interaction ◽  
Transcription Inhibition ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
3D Genome ◽  
Chromatin Interactions ◽  
Pol I ◽  
Pol Iii

AbstractBackgroundThe relationship between transcription and the 3D genome organization is one of the most important questions in molecular biology, but the roles of transcription in 3D chromatin remain controversial. Multiple groups showed that transcription affects global Cohesin binding and genome 3D structures. At the same time, several studies have indicated that transcription inhibition does not affect global chromatin interactions.ResultsHere, we provide the most comprehensive evidence to date to demonstrate that transcription plays a marginal role in organizing the 3D genome in mammalian cells: 1) degraded Pol I, Pol II and Pol III proteins in mESCs, and showed their loss results in little or no changes of global 3D chromatin structures for the first time; 2) selected RNA polymerases high abundance binding sites-associated interactions and found they still persist after the degradation; 3) generated higher resolution chromatin interaction maps and revealed that transcription inhibition mildly alters small loop domains; 4) identified Pol II bound but CTCF and Cohesin unbound loops and disclosed that they are largely resistant to transcription inhibition. Interestingly, Pol II depletion for a longer time significantly affects the chromatin accessibility and Cohesin occupancy, suggesting RNA polymerases are capable of affecting the 3D genome indirectly. So, the direct and indirect effects of transcription inhibition explain the previous confusing effects on the 3D genome.ConclusionsWe conclude that Pol I, Pol II, and Pol III loss only mildly alter chromatin interactions in mammalian cells, suggesting the 3D chromatin structures are pre-established and relatively stable.

scholarly journals Functional mRNA can be generated by RNA polymerase III.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 3597-3607 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Gunnery ◽  
M B Mathews
Keyword(s):  
Human Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Iii ◽  
Chloramphenicol Acetyltransferase ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Pol I ◽  
Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Pol Iii

Eukaryotic cellular mRNA is believed to be synthesized exclusively by RNA polymerase II (pol II), whereas pol I produces long rRNAs and pol III produces 5S rRNA, tRNA, and other small RNAs. To determine whether this functional differentiation is obligatory, we examined the translational potential of an artificial pol III transcript. The coding region of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 tat gene was placed under the control of a strong pol III promoter from the adenovirus type 2 VA RNAI gene. The resultant chimera, pVA-Tat, was transcribed accurately in vivo and in vitro and gave rise to Tat protein, which transactivated a human immunodeficiency virus-driven chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter construct in transfected HeLa cells. pol III-specific mutations down-regulated VA-Tat RNA production in vivo and in vitro and dramatically reduced chloramphenicol acetyltransferase transactivation. As expected for a pol III transcript, VA-Tat RNA was not detectably capped at its 5' end or polyadenylated at its 3' end, but, like mRNA, it was associated with polysomes in a salt-stable manner. Mutational analysis of a short open reading frame upstream of the Tat-coding sequence implicates scanning in the initiation of VA-Tat RNA translation despite the absence of a cap. In comparison with tat mRNA generated by pol II, VA-Tat RNA was present on smaller polysomes and was apparently translated less efficiently, which is consistent with a relatively low initiation rate. Evidently, human cells are capable of utilizing pol III transcripts as functional mRNAs, and neither a cap nor a poly(A) tail is essential for translation, although they may be stimulatory. These findings raise the possibility that some cellular mRNAs are made by pol I or pol III.

scholarly journals Structural insights into RNA polymerase III-mediated transcription termination through trapping poly-deoxythymidine

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Haifeng Hou ◽  
Yan Li ◽  
Mo Wang ◽  
Aijun Liu ◽  
Zishuo Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Transcription Termination ◽  
Transcription Elongation ◽  
Rna Polymerase Iii ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Template Strand ◽  
Pol I ◽  
Exit Tunnel ◽  
Pol Iii ◽  
Dna Template

AbstractTermination of the RNA polymerase III (Pol III)-mediated transcription requires the conversion of an elongation complex (EC) to a pre-termination complex (PTC) on poly-deoxythymidine (dT)-containing non-template strand, a mechanism distinct from Pol I and Pol II. Here, our in vitro transcription elongation assay showed that 5-7 dT-containing DNA template led to transcription termination of Pol III, but not Pol I or Pol II. We assembled human Pol III PTC on a 7 dT-containing DNA template and determined the structure at 3.6 Å resolution. The structure reveals that poly-dT are trapped in a narrow exit tunnel formed by RPC2. A hydrophobic gate of the exit tunnel separates the bases of two connected deoxythymidines and may prevent translocation of the non-template strand. The fork loop 2 stabilizes both template and non-template strands around the transcription fork, and may further prevent strand translocation. Our study shows that the Pol III-specific exit tunnel and FL2 allow for efficient translocation of non-poly-dT sequence during transcription elongation but trap poly-dT to promote DNA retention of Pol III, revealing molecular mechanism of poly-dT-dependent transcription termination of Pol III.

scholarly journals Small nuclear RNA genes transcribed by either RNA polymerase II or RNA polymerase III in monocot plants share three promoter elements and use a strategy to regulate gene expression different from that used by their dicot plant counterparts.

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 5910-5919 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Connelly ◽  
C Marshallsay ◽  
D Leader ◽  
J W Brown ◽  
W Filipowicz
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Iii ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Small Nuclear Rna ◽  
Promoter Elements ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Snrna Gene ◽  
Nuclear Rna ◽  
Pol Iii

RNA polymerase (Pol) II- and RNA Pol III-transcribed small nuclear RNA (snRNA) genes of dicotyledonous plants contain two essential upstream promoter elements, the USE and TATA. The USE is a highly conserved plant snRNA gene-specific element, and its distance from the -30 TATA box, corresponding to approximately three and four helical DNA turns in Pol III and Pol II genes, respectively, is crucial for determining RNA Pol specificity of transcription. Sequences upstream of the USE play no role in snRNA gene transcription in dicot plants. Here we show that for expression of snRNA genes in maize, a monocotyledonous plant, the USE and TATA elements are essential, but not sufficient, for transcription. Efficient expression of both Pol II- and Pol III-specific snRNA genes in transfected maize protoplasts requires an additional element(s) positioned upstream of the USE. This element, named MSP (for monocot-specific promoter; consensus, RGCCCR), is present in one to three copies in monocot snRNA genes and is interchangeable between Pol II- and Pol III-specific genes. The efficiency of snRNA gene expression in maize protoplast is determined primarily by the strength of the MSP element(s); this contrasts with the situation in protoplasts of a dicot plant, Nicotiana plumbaginifolia, where promoter strength is a function of the quality of the USE element. Interestingly, the organization of monocot Pol III-specific snRNA gene promoters closely resembles those of equivalent vertebrate promoters. The data are discussed in the context of the coevolution of Pol II- and Pol III-specific snRNA gene promoters within many eukaryotic organisms.

scholarly journals Reprogramming mRNA Expression in Response to Defect in RNA Polymerase III Assembly in the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (14) ◽  
pp. 7298
Author(s):  
Izabela Rudzińska ◽  
Małgorzata Cieśla ◽  
Tomasz W. Turowski ◽  
Alicja Armatowska ◽  
Ewa Leśniewska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mrna Expression ◽  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
Rna Polymerase Iii ◽  
Mrna Levels ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Protein Coding ◽  
General Transcription Factor ◽  
Pol I ◽  
Pol Iii

The coordinated transcription of the genome is the fundamental mechanism in molecular biology. Transcription in eukaryotes is carried out by three main RNA polymerases: Pol I, II, and III. One basic problem is how a decrease in tRNA levels, by downregulating Pol III efficiency, influences the expression pattern of protein-coding genes. The purpose of this study was to determine the mRNA levels in the yeast mutant rpc128-1007 and its overdose suppressors, RBS1 and PRT1. The rpc128-1007 mutant prevents assembly of the Pol III complex and functionally mimics similar mutations in human Pol III, which cause hypomyelinating leukodystrophies. We applied RNAseq followed by the hierarchical clustering of our complete RNA-seq transcriptome and functional analysis of genes from the clusters. mRNA upregulation in rpc128-1007 cells was generally stronger than downregulation. The observed induction of mRNA expression was mostly indirect and resulted from the derepression of general transcription factor Gcn4, differently modulated by suppressor genes. rpc128-1007 mutation, regardless of the presence of suppressors, also resulted in a weak increase in the expression of ribosome biogenesis genes. mRNA genes that were downregulated by the reduction of Pol III assembly comprise the proteasome complex. In summary, our results provide the regulatory links affected by Pol III assembly that contribute differently to cellular fitness.

scholarly journals RNA polymerase I (Pol I) passage through nucleosomes depends on Pol I subunits binding its lobe structure

2020 ◽  
Vol 295 (15) ◽  
pp. 4782-4795 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp E. Merkl ◽  
Michael Pilsl ◽  
Tobias Fremter ◽  
Katrin Schwank ◽  
Christoph Engel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase I ◽  
Dna Templates ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Naked Dna ◽  
Pol I ◽  
Intrinsic Capacity ◽  
Pol Iii ◽  
Polymerase I

RNA polymerase I (Pol I) is a highly efficient enzyme specialized in synthesizing most ribosomal RNAs. After nucleosome deposition at each round of rDNA replication, the Pol I transcription machinery has to deal with nucleosomal barriers. It has been suggested that Pol I–associated factors facilitate chromatin transcription, but it is unknown whether Pol I has an intrinsic capacity to transcribe through nucleosomes. Here, we used in vitro transcription assays to study purified WT and mutant Pol I variants from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and compare their abilities to pass a nucleosomal barrier with those of yeast Pol II and Pol III. Under identical conditions, purified Pol I and Pol III, but not Pol II, could transcribe nucleosomal templates. Pol I mutants lacking either the heterodimeric subunit Rpa34.5/Rpa49 or the C-terminal part of the specific subunit Rpa12.2 showed a lower processivity on naked DNA templates, which was even more reduced in the presence of a nucleosome. Our findings suggest that the lobe-binding subunits Rpa34.5/Rpa49 and Rpa12.2 facilitate passage through nucleosomes, suggesting possible cooperation among these subunits. We discuss the contribution of Pol I–specific subunit domains to efficient Pol I passage through nucleosomes in the context of transcription rate and processivity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document