scholarly journals THE DIFFERENCE OF PAIN PERCEPTION BETWEEN KETOPROFEN SUPPOSITORY AND 1% PERIPROSTATIC LIDOCAINE INJECTION

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdul Azis ◽  
Wahjoe Djatisoesanto ◽  
Doddy M. Soebadi ◽  
Lukman Hakim ◽  
Budiono Budiono
Keyword(s):  
Pain Score ◽  
Visual Analog Scale ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Pain Perception ◽  
Prostate Volume ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Analog Scale ◽  
Biopsy Material ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Lidocaine Injection

Objective: To compare the pain control results of ketoprofen suppository and periprostatic injection of lidocaine 1% for prostate biopsy. Material & Method: A total of 30 patients who underwent transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy were randomized into 2 groups. Group 1 consisted of 15 patients received 200 mg of ketoprofen suppository. Group 2 received 1% periprostatic lidocaine injection. A visual analog scale was used to assess the pain score during prostate biopsy. Statistical analysis of pain scores was performed using independent t-test and Pearson correlation test. Results: The 2 groups were homogenous in age and prostate volume. There was significant difference in pain score among groups 1 and 2 during prostate biopsy (mean VAS ± SD 0,8 ± 0,8 and 4,5 ± 1,6 respectively, p < 0,0001). There was no significant correlation between pain perception with age (p = 0,779), or prostate volume (p = 0,389) in both groups. Conclusion: Periprostatic lidocaine injection is more effective for decreasing the pain for prostate biopsy compared to ketoprofen suppository. Keywords: Prostate biopsy, pain, transrectal ultrasonography, periprostatic nerve block, visual analog scale.

Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Interdigital Neuroma

2009 ◽  
Vol 99 (3) ◽  
pp. 191-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Fridman ◽  
Jarrett D. Cain ◽  
Lowell Weil
Keyword(s):  
Pain Score ◽  
Visual Analog Scale ◽  
Sham Group ◽  
Morton’S Neuroma ◽  
Analog Scale ◽  
Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy ◽  
Extracorporeal Shockwave ◽  
Shockwave Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Morton's Neuroma

Background: We sought to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave therapy as a therapeutic treatment for destroying Morton’s neuroma. Methods: Twenty-five patients (25 feet) were included in the study. Indications for participation were more than 8 months of conservative care with a visual analog scale pain score of 4 or greater. The mean overall pain score on a modified visual analog scale was 6.9 preoperatively. Results: Thirteen patients were randomized to the active group and 12 to the sham group. Two patients in the sham group were lost to follow-up. Post-treatment evaluations were performed at 1, 6, and 12 weeks by a blinded investigator (L.W.). The end point evaluation parameter was the reduction in visual analog scale score. The treatment group showed a significant difference before and after extracorporeal shockwave therapy (P &lt; .0001). The sham group did not have a significant difference after 12 weeks (P = .1218). Conclusions: Extracorporeal shockwave therapy is a possible alternative to surgical excision for Morton’s neuroma. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 99(3): 191–193, 2009)

scholarly journals May ultrasound probe size influence pain perception of needle piercing during transrectal prostate biopsy? A prospective evaluation

2016 ◽  
Vol 88 (3) ◽  
pp. 223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Fabiani ◽  
Lucilla Servi ◽  
Alessandra Filosa ◽  
Fabrizio Fioretti ◽  
Valentina Maurelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Local Anesthesia ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Pain Perception ◽  
Prostate Volume ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Probe Size ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Introduction and Objective: Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx) is the definitive step in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (CaP). Patients (pts) generally experience significant pain during the procedure at the point that biopsy should be accompanied by some form of anesthesia. Several different factors influence pain perception (PP) during TRUS-Bx. In our study we want to assess that the use of an ergonomic smaller sized probe reduces PP during the procedure independently from the administration of local anesthesia or pain relieving drugs. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective, randomized study in which 114 pts who underwent TRUS-Bx due to abnormal PSA and/or to digital rectal examination (DRE) suspicious findings were considered eligible. Pts were split in two TRUS-Bx groups into which we used two different sized ultrasound probes. In group 1, 61 pts underwent TRUS-Bx with ALOKA end fire probe (size 74 mm). In group 2, 53 pts underwent TRUS-Bx with B-K Type 8818 probe (size 58 mm). Both groups were treated with no local anesthesia or pain relieving drugs. Pain was evaluated three times using a 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS), during the DRE (VAS 1), during the insertion of the probe (VAS 2) and during the needle piercing (VAS 3). Results: Mean age of pts was 68.03 (SD 8.51); mean tPSA and mean prostate volume was 7.75 (SD 4.83) and 45.17cc (SD 17.7), respectively. The two groups were homogeneous respect to tPSA (p = 0.675) and to prostate volume (p = 0.296); age was significantly different (p = 0.04) between Group 1 (65.93) and Group 2 (70.43), whereas no statistically significant correlation between VAS 3 and age was observed (p = 0.179). Analyzing pain perception, we found no statistically significant difference between the two groups in DRE (VAS 1; p = 0.839); on the contrary, patients in Group 1 experienced on average more pain than other in Group 2 both during the insertion of the probe (VAS 2 3.49 vs 1.09; p &lt; 0.001) and during the needle piercing VAS 3 (2.8 vs 2.00; p &lt; 0.05). The discomfort during probe insertion and manipulation was perceived as very high (VAS 2 &gt; 5) in 42.6% of patients in Group 1 and in 9.4% in Group 2. Globally, the procedure was well tolerated (mean VAS score &lt; 3) in 77% of patients in Group 1 and in 90% in Group 2. The proportion of patients who experienced more than moderate pain (VAS &gt; 5) during needle piercing ranged 24.6 % in Group 1 to 18.9 % in Group 2. Conclusions: Patients who underwent a TRUS-Bx with the 58-mm circumference probe were found to experience lower degree of pain not only during the insertion of the probe through the anal sphincter, but also in the moment of needle piercing.

How Should We Assess Pain: Do Patients Prefer a Quantitative or Qualitative Scale? A Study of Patient Preferences

2020 ◽  
pp. 104990912094559
Author(s):  
Shagufta Firdous ◽  
Andrea Berger ◽  
Waqas Jehangir ◽  
Carlos Fernandez ◽  
Bertrand Behm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Analog Scale ◽  
Pain Assessment ◽  
Subjective Experience ◽  
Pain Perception ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Analog Scale ◽  
Numeric Pain Rating Scale ◽  
The Difference

Background: Pain perception is a subjective experience and is influenced by a variety of factors. Pain assessment tools, included the numeric pain rating scale (NRS) and the visual analog scale (VAS). A VAS qualitative (VASQ) scale asks patients their current pain level along a continuum of “Good Day,” “Average Day,” or “Bad Day.” We had patients complete both scales and asked them their preference and reason for their choice. Methods: We identified patients 18 years of age and older, seen by Palliative medicine at Geisinger, who had cancer-associated pain of at least one-month duration. Patients filled out the study questionnaire composed of 2 questions. Characteristics of patients who preferred the VASQ were compared to those who preferred the NRS using a 2-sample t tests or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and Pearson χ2 or Fisher exact tests. The relationship between the NRS and the VASQ used the Pearson correlation coefficient. Results: One hundred forty-six patients completed the questionnaire, 52.1% were female; 63.7% preferred the NRS, 31.5% preferred the VASQ. Patients who preferred the NRS reported a higher NRS rating than patients who preferred the VASQ (mean NRS rating of 6.0 compared to 5.3) but the difference was not statistically significant ( P = .1531). Visual analog scale qualitative ratings were higher among patients who preferred the NRS, but the difference was not statistically different (mean rating of 5.2 vs 4.8, P = .3669). Conclusion: Patients preferred the NRS over VASQ for pain assessment. Patients tend to rate their pain at a higher level when using NRS compared to VASQ.

scholarly journals The effect of local ketamine infiltration on post tonsillectomy pain scale

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 38
Author(s):  
Ade Asyari ◽  
Novialdi Novialdi ◽  
Elniza Morina ◽  
Rimelda Aquinas ◽  
Nasman Puar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Analog Scale ◽  
Secondary Infection ◽  
Pain Scale ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Analog Scale ◽  
Noticeable Effect ◽  
Local Infiltration ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Test Control

Background: Post tonsillectomy pain is one of the surgery side effects that most disturbing for patient’s comfort and will cause dysphagia, low intake, dehydration, secondary infection and bleeding. Ketamine is an anesthetic drug that has strong analgesic effect and easily available in any hospital at relatively cheap price. Objective: To find out the effect of local ketamine infiltration on the post tonsillectomy pain scale. Method: An experimental study during tonsillectomy with a Post Test Control Group on 12 samples without local infiltration of ketamine and 12 samples with local infiltration of ketamine in peritonsillar pillar. The pain was assessed 2 hours and 24 hours post extubation with pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Result: The VAS value from patients who were given local infiltration of ketamine in peritonsillar pillar were lower (5.83 ± 0.72 at 2 hours and 2.83 ± 0.58 at 24 hours post extubation) compared to patients without ketamine infiltration (7.83 ± 0.58 at 2 hours and 3.58 ± 0.51 at 24 hours post extubation). The result showed statistically significant difference (p <0.05) at 2 hours and 24 hours post extubation. Conclusion: The VAS score of the ketamine infiltration group is lower at 2 hours and 24 hours post extubation than the group without ketamine infiltration, showing there was a noticeable effect of local ketamine infiltration on the post tonsillectomy pain scale.Keywords : post tonsillectomy pain, ketamine, local infiltration, visual analog scale ABSTRAKLatar belakang: Nyeri pascatonsilektomi adalah salah satu efek samping operasi yang sangat mengganggu kenyamanan pasien, dan dapat menyebabkan gangguan menelan, kurangnya asupan nutrisi, dehidrasi, infeksi sekunder dan perdarahan. Ketamin merupakan obat anestesi yang memiliki efek analgetik yang kuat dan mudah didapatkan di semua tipe rumah sakit dengan harga yang relatif murah. Tujuan: Mengetahui efek pemberian infiltrasi lokal ketamin terhadap skala nyeri pascatonsilektomi. Metode: Penelitian eksperimental dengan desain Post Test Control Group pada 12 sampel tanpa pemberian infiltrasi lokal ketamin dan 12 sampel dengan pemberian infiltrasi lokal ketamin di pilar peritonsil saat tonsilektomi. Dilakukan penilaian nyeri 2 jam dan 24 jam pascaekstubasi menggunakan skala nyeri Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Hasil: Nilai VAS pasien yang diberi infiltrasi lokal ketamin di pilar peritonsil lebih rendah (5,83±0,72 pada 2 jam dan 2,83 ± 0,58 pada 24 jam pascaekstubasi) dibanding tanpa diberi infiltrasi lokal ketamine (7,83 ± 0,58 pada 2 jam dan 3,58± 0,51 pada 24 jam pascaekstubasi), dan bermakna secara statistik (p<0,05) pada kedua penilaian. Kesimpulan: Terdapat efek nyata infiltrasi lokal ketamin terhadap skala nyeri pascatonsilektomi, dimana nilai VAS kelompok yang diberi infiltrasi ketamin lebih rendah, baik pada 2 jam ataupun 24 jam pascaekstubasi dibanding kelompok yang tidak diberi infiltrasi ketamin.

scholarly journals A comparison of pain registration by Visual Analog Scale and Numeric Rating Scale – a cross-sectional study of primary triage registration

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jofrid Kollltveit ◽  
Malin Osaland ◽  
Marianne Reimers ◽  
Magnus Berle
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Visual Analog Scale ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Emergency Admission ◽  
Numeric Rating Scale ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Analog Scale ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Numeric Rating

BackgroundPain is a subjective sensation; self-reporting is important for quantifying pain intensity. There are several different validated tools for this, such as Visual Analog Scale and Numeric Rating Scale. In the clinic, these terms are often used as equivalent. The objective of this study was to examine correlation and agreement between the pain registration tools in triage in an emergency department.Materials and MethodsThe study was performed in the Department of Emergency Medicine at Haukeland University Hospital in the period June-August 2019. We registered the pain score with two tools in 200 unselected patients in emergency admission with pain. In addition, we registrered gender, age, triage and general department affiliation.ResultsWe found a strong correlation between the pain registration tools by Spearmans correlation test (rho=0,930, p<0,001). There were no significant difference between the pain registration tools within the subgroups. Bland-Altman analysis show agreement between the two pain registration tools.ConclusionsIn an Emergency Department triage is it acceptable to use Visual Analog Scale and Numeric Rating Scale as equivalent, as long as the correct terminology is used.

S192 Comparison of local anesthesia methods used in transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy by visual analog scale

2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. e1300, S192a-e1300, S192b
Author(s):  
K.B. Cengiz ◽  
E. Korgali ◽  
G. Dundar ◽  
S. Ayan ◽  
G. Gokce ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Local Anesthesia ◽  
Visual Analog Scale ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasonography ◽  
Analog Scale

Effect of alpha-blocker use on morbidity and lower urinary tract symptoms in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy

2021 ◽  
pp. 039156032110383
Author(s):  
Remzi Salar ◽  
Güven Erbay
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Voiding Dysfunction ◽  
Prostate Volume ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
Urine Volume ◽  
Maximum Flow ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Alpha Blocker ◽  
Urinary Tract Symptoms ◽  
Significant Difference

Objective: To evaluate voiding dysfunction and morbidity after transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy and to investigate whether pre-intervention alpha-blocker treatment had any effect on morbidity and voiding dysfunction. Material and methods: The study included 197 consecutive patients who underwent TRUS-guided prostate biopsy between January 2014 and January 2018. The patients were divided into two groups, those receiving alpha-blocker (silodosin) and those not receiving alpha-blocker treatment before the procedure (controls). All patients were evaluated before and one week after the procedure with the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), measurements of maximum flow rate ( Qmax), post-void residual urine volume (PVR) and prostate volume, and procedure-related complications were also recorded. All analyzed parameters were compared by within-group and between-group evaluations. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of IPSS, Qmax and prostate volume values before biopsy. In the follow-up evaluation performed on the seventh day after biopsy, IPSS, PVR and prostate volume were found to be increased, whereas Qmax was decreased in the control group ( p < 0.05). In the silodosin group, an increase in prostate volume was observed, but there were no significant changes in IPSS, Qmax and PVR values. Acute urinary retention (AUR) after the biopsy procedure developed in two patients (2%) in the silodosin group, and in nine patients (9.1%) in the control group ( p = 0.02). No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of biopsy-related complications, except for AUR. Conclusion: We believe that alpha-blocker treatment initiated before biopsy may be advantageous in preventing voiding dysfunction that may develop after the procedure.

The Effect of Dry Needling on Pain, Range of Motion of Ankle Joint, and Ultrasonographic Changes of Plantar Fascia in Patients With Plantar Fasciitis

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Afsaneh Moosaei Saein ◽  
Ziaeddin Safavi-Farokhi ◽  
Atefeh Aminianfar ◽  
Marzieh Mortezanejad
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Ankle Joint ◽  
Visual Analog Scale ◽  
Plantar Fasciitis ◽  
Plantar Flexion ◽  
Plantar Fascia ◽  
Trigger Points ◽  
Dry Needling ◽  
Analog Scale ◽  
Significant Difference

Context: Plantar fasciitis (PF) is a common and devastating disease. Despite different treatments, there is no clear evidence for the effect of these treatments on PF. One of the therapy methods used in physiotherapy is dry needling (DN). So the purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of DN on the pain and range of motion of the ankle joint and plantar fascia thickness in subjects with PF who are suffering from the trigger points of the gastrocnemius and soleus muscles. Methods: In this study, 20 volunteer females with PF were randomly assigned into DN treatment and control groups. Measurements were range of motion in dorsiflexion and plantar flexion, plantar fascia thickness, and visual analog scale measured before, immediately, and 1 month after the end of the intervention in both groups. Results: There were significant differences in the plantar fascia thickness and visual analog scale between the 2 groups. Plantar fascia thickness (P = .016) and visual analog scale (P = .03) significantly decreased in the treatment group. However, there was no significant difference in plantar flexion (P = .582) and dorsiflexion range of motion (P = .173) between groups. Conclusion: The result of this study showed that DN can reduce pain and plantar fascia thickness in women with PF who are suffering from trigger points of the gastrocnemius and soleus muscles. Level of evidence: Level 1, randomized controlled trial.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document