scholarly journals CYP3A4 Inducer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Martine Gehin ◽  
Jolanta Wierdak ◽  
Giancarlo Sabattini ◽  
Patricia N. Sidharta ◽  
Jasper Dingemanse

2014 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 613-621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Hamilton ◽  
Julie L. Wolf ◽  
Daniel W. Drolet ◽  
Scott H. Fettner ◽  
Ashok K. Rakhit ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3983-3983
Author(s):  
Andrzej Hellmann ◽  
Simon A. Rule ◽  
Jan Walewski ◽  
Ofer Shpilberg ◽  
Huaibao Feng ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3983 Background: Bortezomib is primarily metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and 2C19 enzymes. Effects of co-administration of rifampicin (a potent CYP3A4 inducer) and dexamethasone (weak CYP3A4 inducer) on the pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD) and safety profiles of bortezomib were evaluated. Methods: Patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) were enrolled in this open-label, 2-stage, parallel-group study. In stage 1, patients were randomized (1:1) to receive 3 cycles of bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2) on d 1, 4, 8, and 11 q3wk either alone or in combination with rifampicin 600 mg once-daily on d 4 to 10 of cycle 3 only. Stage 2 patients received bortezomib at same dose and schedule in combination with dexamethasone 40 mg once-daily on d 1 to 4 and d 9 to 12 of cycle 3 only. Patients could continue with bortezomib monotherapy for up to 10 cycles in case of clinical benefit. For PK/PD, blood samples were collected before and through 72 hours following bortezomib administration on d 11 of cycles 2 and 3. PK was the primary endpoint, secondary endpoints included PD (proteasome inhibition) and safety. Results: 61 patients were enrolled (39 MM, 22 NHL) in the study. 13 were treated with bortezomib + rifampicin, 18 with bortezomib + dexamethasone, and 30 with bortezomib only. Co-administration of rifampicin reduced the mean bortezomib maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) by approximately 23% (118 vs 93 ng/mL) and the mean area under plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 72 hours (AUC72) by approximately 45% (223 vs 123 ng.h/mL). Co-administration of dexamethasone had no effect on mean AUC72 (179 vs 170 ng.h/mL). The mean bortezomib Cmax was 20% lower after co-administration of dexamethasone (140 vs 119 ng/mL); however this difference in Cmax was within the observed variability in Cmax during cycle 2 (CV=38%) and cycle 3 (CV=45%). Mean (SD) maximum percent proteasome inhibition (Emax) and area under percent proteasome inhibition-time curve from 0 to 72 hours (AUE72h) were comparable for bortezomib alone and in combination with rifampicin (Emax: 61.9 [4.56] vs. 62.3 [3.81] and AUE72h: 836 [323] vs. 777 [358]). Co-administration of dexamethasone did not affect the Emax (66.7 [4.27] vs. 61.8 [6.69]) or AUE72h (1329 [638] vs. 1157 [381]). Safety profiles were consistent with prior bortezomib experience in this population. Drug-related serious adverse events and treatment discontinuations were reported in 7/30 (23%) and 8/30 (27%) in bortezomib-only, in 3/13 (23%) and 3/13 (23%) in bortezomib + rifampicin, and 3/18 (17%) and 5/18 (28%) in bortezomib + dexamethasone subgroups. Investigator-assessed responses (CR+PR) were observed in 13/17 MM and 6/13 NHL patients in bortezomib-only, in 6/9 MM and 3/4 NHL patients in bortezomib + rifampicin, and in 10/13 MM and 2/5 NHL patients in bortezomib + dexamethasone subgroups. Conclusions: Co-administration of dexamethasone did not affect the PK or PD profiles of bortezomib. Co-administration of rifampicin reduced bortezomib exposure (AUC) by approximately 45%. Patients receiving bortezomib concomitantly with strong CYP3A4 inducers, such as rifampicin, should be monitored for reduction in clinical effect, while concomitant administration of weak CYP3A4 inducers, such as dexamethasone, is not expected to affect the bortezomib pharmacologic profile. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Discussion of Velcade in NHL subtypes other than mantle cell lymphoma is included. Rule:Johnson & Johson: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy. Walewski:Johnson & Johnson: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Investigators fee. Shpilberg:Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Feng:Johnson & Johnson: Employment. van de Velde:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership. Patel:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership. Skee:Johnson & Johnson: Employment. Girgis:Johnson & Johnson: Employment. Louw:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Key Oncologics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13512-e13512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur P. Staddon ◽  
Trilok V. Parekh ◽  
Roland Elmar Knoblauch ◽  
Chi Keung ◽  
Apexa Bernard ◽  
...  

e13512 Background: Trabectedin (Yondelis; T) is a tetrahydroisoquinoline compound initially isolated from the marine tunicate, Ecteinascidia turbinata, and currently produced synthetically. It is primarily metabolized by the cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4 enzyme. Thus, potent inducers or inhibitors of this enzyme may alter the plasma concentrations of T. This study assessed the effects of rifampin (R), a strong CYP3A4 inducer, on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of T. Methods: In this 2-way crossover study, patients (≥18 years of age) with locally advanced or metastatic disease were randomized (1:1) to receive one of the 2 treatment sequences: sequence 1: R plus T followed 28 days later by T; sequence 2: T followed 28 days later by R plus T. During each sequence, R (600 mg/day) was administered for 6 consecutive days and T (1.3 mg/m2, IV) was administered over a 3 hour infusion. Dexamethasone (20 mg, IV) was administered before T administration. PK and safety of T were evaluated with and without coadministration of R. Results: Of the 11 enrolled patients, 8 were PK evaluable. Coadministration of R with T decreased mean maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) by approximately 22% and mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast) by approximately 31% (Table 1). Coadministration of R with T also resulted in 23% shorter elimination half-life. Overall, the safety profile of T was comparable when administered alone or with R. Conclusions: In comparison with T alone, coadministration of R resulted in reduced systemic exposure of T in these 8 patients, as measured by Cmax and AUClast. The coadministration of potent inducers of CYP3A4 with T may increase the metabolic clearance of T. Clinical trial information: NCT01273480. [Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 100 (8) ◽  
pp. adv00108-2 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Yokoyama ◽  
R Hayashi ◽  
Y Umemori ◽  
A Arimatsu ◽  
A Yuki ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16567-e16567
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Del Priore ◽  
Gerald H. Sokol ◽  
Wen-Tien Chen ◽  
Che-Kai Tsao ◽  
Steve Hoffman

e16567 Background: SM88 is a novel combination of substituted amino acid ( AA) and repurposed agents with non-toxic activity in a variety of cancers including prostate (PC). Non-metastatic biochemically recurrent PC (nmPC) is ideal for such a well-tolerated, non-androgen based treatment. We present biomarker activity including CTCs (circulating tumor cells) after completion of the Ib dose escalating pharmacokinetic portion of the SM88 development plan. Methods: Planned analysis of an ongoing prospective Phase Ib/II open label study of nmPC (PCWG3 definition). Subject 1 received the 1stdose level of AA, and others received 2x dose. All subjects also received a combination of low dose re-purposed CYP3a4 inducer, oxidative stress catalyst, and mTOR inhibitor. Results: Four subjects completed at least 1 cycle (28d) with all PK sampling as prespecified. Median age was 73(70-80); all had prior ADT that was discontinued 3-6 yrs earlier, and either had curative intent prostatectomy (n = 2) or RT (n = 2); Testosterone level was castrate in one after prior RT. CTCs fell (p < 0.01) to undetectable (n = 1) or by > 25% (n = 3) (see table) while PSA remained stable (PCWG3 criteria). Preliminary LDH, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (N:L), urinary NTx, bone specific AlkPhos (bAP) trends are in the table below. There were no drug related serious adverse events (2 grade: 1- pigmentation, 1- vasomotor). EORTC-QLQ30 and PR25 scores were either improved or stable. Conclusions: Treatment with SM88 in patients with nmPC in the completed phase Ib cohort was associated with CTC reduction, and stable biomarker trends including PSA and LDH. There was no significant toxicity or adverse patient reported outcomes. Based on these results, the dose escalation was stopped at the second level and a cohort expansion phase II initiated. A phase III RCT is planned for confirmation of these results. Clinical trial information: NCT02796898. [Table: see text]


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 310-310
Author(s):  
Marcus Smith Noel ◽  
Andrea Wang-Gillam ◽  
Allyson J. Ocean ◽  
Giuseppe Del Priore ◽  
Vincent J. Picozzi

310 Background: Advanced PC patients with ≥ 3Ls of chemo or ECOG PS 2 are generally excluded from clinical trials. SM88 demonstrated no drug related AEs > grade 2 in an interim prostate phase 2 (JCO 2018 36:6S P 175). We sought to determine the feasibility of a trial in this vulnerable population using SM88. Methods: Prospective randomized phase 2 of SM-88 (tyrosine derivative, CYP3a4 inducer, mTOR and oxidative stress catalyst) in patients with locally PD or mPC, ECOG PS < 2 and ≥ 2 weeks from prior therapy. Results: Mean age = 64.9 (range 45.6-84.1); 45.5% female, 93.1% white, 6.9% other; median prior lines = 3 (range 1-6); 12% had prior RT and 17% surgery. Median ECOG PS was 1 with 36.6% 0, 63.3% 1 and 0% ECOG PS 2. From April 2018 to this abstract deadline, 72 patients at 24 sites have consented; 36 patients initiated therapy, 19 failed screening and 17 remained in screening. Time from opening trial to first patient consented = 5.1 wks; median time last regimen to consent = 6.7 wks; from consent to drug administration (C1D1) = 1.7 wks. Subjects traveled up to 2600 miles to enroll at a site with an open slot. Median number of subjects/site = 3 (1-15). Median time on trial is 52 days (1-22 wks). There were 15 unrelated SAEs among 36 randomized subjects; three subjects died after consenting but before receiving study drug (table). Grade 4 and 5 SAEs∗ were more common before receiving drug or unrelated to drug (26/94) than at least possibly drug related (0/17) (Fisher p < 0.05). Efficacy using RECIST, PERCIST and BICR along with CTCs, 19.9, NLR, PROs and other outcomes are being collected with high compliance. Conclusions: This prospective SM88 trial suggests that heavily pretreated PC patients with criteria that includes less than ideal ECOG can participate and gain access to novel therapies. This trial plans to enroll 99 additional subjects in under a year. Although ECOG 2 was allowed none have been consented to date and may reflect investigator bias on enrollment or PS assessment. Investigators can meet the needs of this patient population by considering them for inclusion in future drug development trials. Clinical trial information: NCT03512756. [Table: see text]


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 200-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcus Smith Noel ◽  
Andrea Wang-Gillam ◽  
Allyson J. Ocean ◽  
Sant P. Chawla ◽  
Giuseppe Del Priore ◽  
...  

200 Background: SM-88 (tyrosine derivative [Td], mTOR inhibitor, CYP3a4 inducer and oxidative stress catalyst) is a relatively non-toxic, targeted therapy that utilizes the Warburg Effect in combination with oxidative stress to cause tumor cell death. It is well suited for pancreas cancer because of its ability to penetrate tumors and be tolerated by debilitated patients. Methods: Patients progressed on at least one line of chemotherapy are eligible for either low versus high dose single agent SM-88 in the dose selecting first stage of this trial. The primary endpoint of the study is response rate by BICR (NCT03512756). Results: As of Sept 23, 36 subjects with initial stage II 26%, III 33%, or IV 41%, were randomized between an active Td dose (430 mg/d) and 920 mg/d. Mean age was 64.9 (45.6 - 84.1); BMI 24.2 (16.8 - 36.7); female 45.5%, white 93.1%, black 4.5%; median of 3 prior lines (range 1 - 6); baseline median albumin, neutrophil lymphocyte ratio, alk phos and 19.9 were 3.8 g/dl (2.6 - 9.6), 4 (1 - 141), 179.5 (54 - 661) and 5089 (4 - 651, 696) respectively. The regimen was well tolerated with no treatment related grade 4 or 5 events; 55.6% of treated subjects (20/36) had 94 AEs, with 18.0% (17/94) being at least possibly treatment related, of which three were grade 3 (arthralgia, fatigue and asthenia). CTCs at baseline were detected in 97% (mean 93.1 cells/4 ml) and fell in 69% (11/16) evaluable subjects from 141.4 to a nadir of 30.7/4 ml (median reduction 77% [3% - 97%]). 22.2% (2/9) evaluable subjects showed CA19.9 declines, both of which also showed CTC declines. 83% of subjects have remained on treatment a median of 4.7 wks (1 - 18.7); 6 were eligible for the initial scheduled assessment at 2 months; 3 of 4 evaluable subjects (75%) had RECIST or PET SUV responses. Lesion SUVs decreased an average of 24.1% (8.3 - 35.7%). EORTC QLQ-C30, -PAN26 and correlative assays were obtained including IGF, leptin, genomics, NLR, and others. Conclusions: SM-88 has demonstrated unconfirmed monotherapy efficacy signals with no meaningful toxicity in a preliminary assessment of this ongoing trial. With additional follow up a dose will be selected for expansion Clinical trial information: NCT03512756.


Author(s):  
Y. Karnakar Reddy ◽  
T. Ramamohan Reddy

In the present investigation it was aimed to evaluate any possible pharmacokinetic interactions between Phenytoin and Rivaroxaban. Study was conducted in Male Wistar rats; animals were divided into three groups. Group 1 received Phenytoin alone, Group 2 received Rivaroxaban alone and Group 3 received Phenytoin and Rivaroxaban concomitantly. The treatment was given for 8 days and the blood samples were collected on day 1 and day 8. The samples were analyzed by HPLC. The results were showed no significant difference in the Pharmacokinetic parameters of Phenytoin in presence of Rivaroxaban. Whereas Rivaroxaban showed significant decrease in both Cmax and tmax in combination with Phenytoin. Phenytoin is a combined-gp inducer and strong CYP3A4 inducer therefore it may induce the metabolism of Rivaroxaban so it reduces the concentrations and increase the elimination rate. Based on the results obtained from pharmacokinetic study it was evident that the single dose of Rivaroxaban in combination with Phenytoin shows statistically significant interactions in its pharmacokinetic parameters.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document