scholarly journals Atypical Squamous Cell-Favor High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion ◽  
Atypical Squamous Cell ◽  
Intraepithelial Lesion

Pathologic features of anogenital precancerous high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (squamous cell carcinomain situ)

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (9) ◽  
pp. 735-739
Author(s):  
Ruzeng Xue ◽  
Amira Elbendary ◽  
Manuel Valdebran ◽  
Soham Chaudhari ◽  
Dirk Elston
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion ◽  
Pathologic Features ◽  
Carcinomain Situ ◽  
Intraepithelial Lesion

scholarly journals High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion of the Gastroesophageal Junction Secondary to High-Risk Human Papillomavirus

2019 ◽  
Vol 152 (3) ◽  
pp. 359-364
Author(s):  
Edward B Stelow ◽  
Erik A Dill ◽  
Jonathan J Davick ◽  
Michael B McCabe ◽  
Vanessa M Shami
Keyword(s):  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Squamous Cell Carcinomas ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion ◽  
History Of ◽  
Intraepithelial Lesion ◽  
High Risk Hpv

ABSTRACT Objectives Although the role of human papillomavirus (HPV) in the development of some carcinomas (eg, anogenital and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas) is nondebatable, there is still significant controversy regarding the relationship of HPV and esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs). Methods All cases were sampled at or near the gastroesophageal junctions in patients with reflux and/or known Barrett esophagus and appear to have been initially sampled “incidentally.” Patients were all men, aged 56 to 80 years. None had a known history of other HPV-related disease. Results We present four cases of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion of the gastroesophageal junction secondary to high-risk HPV that have identical histologic features to similar lesions of the anogenital tract. Conclusions Whether such lesions are at risk for developing into invasive SCC remains unclear.

Comparison of Performance of Conventional and ThinPrep Gynecologic Preparations in the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytology Program

2004 ◽  
Vol 128 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew A. Renshaw ◽  
Nancy A. Young ◽  
George G. Birdsong ◽  
Patricia E. Styer ◽  
Diane D. Davey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Error Rate ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Error Rates ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion ◽  
Exact Match ◽  
Intraepithelial Lesion

Abstract Context.—Results of clinical trials suggest that interpretation of liquid-based cytology preparations is more accurate and is associated with less screening error than interpretation of conventional preparations. Objective.—In this study, the performance of participants in interpreting ThinPrep (TP) preparations was compared with participants' performance on conventional Papanicolaou tests in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology (PAP). Design.—The results of the PAP from the year 2002 were reviewed, and the discordancies to series and exact-match error rates for the 2 cytologic methods were compared. Results.—For this study, a total of 89 815 interpretations from conventional smears and 20 886 interpretations from TP samples were analyzed. Overall, interpretations of TP preparations had both significantly fewer false-positive (1.6%) and false-negative (1.3%) rates than those of conventional smears (P = .001 and P = .02, respectively) for validated or validated-equivalent slides, as assessed by concordance with the correct diagnostic series. In this assessment of concordance to series, interpretations of educational TP and conventional preparations were similar, except for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, in which the performance was significantly worse for educational TP preparations (false-negative rate of 8.1% vs 4.1% for conventional smears, P < .001). When interpretations were matched to the exact diagnosis, validated-equivalent TP preparations were generally more accurate for diagnoses in the 100 series and 200 series than were conventional smears. Notably, for the reference diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma, the exact-match error rate on validated equivalent TP slides was significantly greater than that of conventional slides (44.5% vs 23.1%, P < .001). Interpretations of educational TP preparations also had a significantly higher error rate in matching to the exact reference diagnosis for squamous cell carcinoma (33.7% vs 22.8%, P = .007). Conclusions.—Overall, TP preparations in this program were associated with significantly lower error rates than conventional smears for both validated and educational cases. However, unlike the negative for intraepithelial lesion and malignancy, not otherwise specified, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, and adenocarcinoma cytodiagnostic challenges, participants' responses indicated some difficulty in recognizing high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and squamous cell carcinoma.

Detection of Adenocarcinoma In Situ of the Cervix in Papanicolaou Tests: Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy With Other High-Grade Lesions

2004 ◽  
Vol 128 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew A. Renshaw ◽  
Dina R. Mody ◽  
Richard L. Lozano ◽  
Emily E. Volk ◽  
Molly K. Walsh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Interlaboratory Comparison ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Adenocarcinoma In Situ ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion ◽  
Intraepithelial Lesion

Abstract Context.—Adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix is a recently recognized interpretation in the Bethesda 2001 system. Although specific morphologic criteria have been published, recognizing this entity is still difficult. Objective.—To compare pathologists' ability to correctly identify and categorize adenocarcinoma in situ with their ability to identify and categorize adenocarcinoma, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, and squamous cell carcinoma. Design.—Pathologists' reviews in the 2001 and 2002 College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology Program, an interlaboratory comparison program for gynecologic cytology, were examined. Cases were usually reviewed by multiple pathologists. False-negative rates, the percentage of reviews with exact agreement with reference interpretations, and the percentage of cases in which all reviews were in exact agreement with the reference interpretation for adenocarcinoma in situ, adenocarcinoma, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, and squamous cell carcinoma were compared. Results.—A total of 213 reviews of cases categorized as adenocarcinoma in situ were compared with 2821 reviews of adenocarcinoma, 7535 reviews of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, and 1886 reviews of squamous cell carcinoma. The false-negative rate for adenocarcinoma in situ (11.7%) was significantly higher than that for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (4.6%, P < .001) and squamous cell carcinoma (3.3%, P < .001) but not for adenocarcinoma (8.9%, P = .16). Of all the reviews of adenocarcinoma in situ cases, 46.5% were interpreted specifically as adenocarcinoma in situ, compared to 72.2% of reviews of adenocarcinoma, 73.2% of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, and 75.1% of squamous cell carcinoma. No individual case of adenocarcinoma in situ was always specifically recognized as adenocarcinoma in situ; 26.5% of cases of adenocarcinoma were specifically recognized as such in all reviews. Findings were similar with and without the inclusion of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion/carcinoma, not otherwise specified, as an acceptable review interpretation for cases of adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Conclusion.—These data from expert-referenced and biopsy-proven cases suggest that adenocarcinoma in situ is not as easily recognized or categorized as other serious diagnoses.

scholarly journals Perianal squamous cell carcinoma with high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia in an HIV-positive patient using highly active antiretroviral therapy: case report

2007 ◽  
Vol 125 (5) ◽  
pp. 292-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio Carlos Nahas ◽  
Caio Sergio Rizkallah Nahas ◽  
Edesio Vieira da Silva Filho ◽  
Jose Eduardo Levi ◽  
Fabio Cesar Atui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Anal Canal ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy ◽  
Hiv Positive ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion ◽  
Highly Active ◽  
Intraepithelial Lesion

CONTEXT: Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has turned human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection into a chronic condition, and this has led to increased incidence of anal dysplasia among HIV-positive patients. Routine anal evaluation including the anal canal and perianal area is recommended for this population, especially for patients infected by oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) types. CASE REPORT: A 54-year-old homosexual HIV-positive man presented with a six-year history of recurrent perianal and anal warts. He had previously undergone incomplete surgical excision and fulguration in another institution on two occasions. He had been using HAART over the past two years. He presented some condylomatous spreading lesions occupying part of the anal canal and the perianal skin, and also a well-demarcated slightly painful perianal plaque of dimensions 1.0 x 1.0 cm. Both anal canal Pap smears and biopsies guided by high-resolution anoscopy revealed high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Biopsies of the border of the perianal plaque also revealed high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. HPV DNA testing of the anus detected the presence of HPV-16 type. The patient underwent local full-thickness excision of the lesion. Histological analysis on the excised tissue revealed high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion with one focus of microinvasive squamous cell cancer measuring 1 mm. No lymph vessel or perineural invasion was detected. The patient showed pathological evidence of recurrent anal and perianal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions at the sixth-month follow-up and required further ablation of those lesions. However no invasive squamous cell carcinoma recurrence has been detected so far.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document