scholarly journals Pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with portal hypertension

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
CHEST Journal ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 144 (4) ◽  
pp. 142A
Author(s):  
Ghassan Kamel ◽  
Joseph Espiritu ◽  
Adrian Di Bisceglie ◽  
Guilan Chen ◽  
Reema Syed ◽  
...  

ESC CardioMed ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 2506-2507
Author(s):  
John Coghlan

Screening programmes for pulmonary hypertension are justifiable in some circumstances but not others. The inherent inaccuracies of the diagnostic tools and the low prevalence of pulmonary hypertension renders screening programmes ineffective unless the population evaluated with the primary screening tool (echocardiography) can be enriched. Nevertheless, significant progress has been made over the past 5 years and screening programmes are now strongly recommended (class 1 recommendation) in asymptomatic systemic sclerosis, BMPR2 mutation carriers, first-degree relatives of patients with hereditable pulmonary hypertension, and patients with portal hypertension referred for transplantation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. S119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarine Beukian ◽  
Ewelina Wojtaszek ◽  
Lori A. Reyes ◽  
Ramyashree Tummala ◽  
Matthew I. Tomey ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 204589401989542
Author(s):  
Li Huang ◽  
Wen Li ◽  
Tao Yang ◽  
Changming Xiong ◽  
Xinhai Ni ◽  
...  

Both portal hypertension and splenectomy are risk factors for pulmonary hypertension. However, the interactions between portal hypertension and splenectomy in the development of pulmonary hypertension remain unclear. Twelve newly diagnosed pulmonary hypertension patients with a previous history of splenectomy induced by portal hypertension were recruited between November 2008 and May 2017. We compared their clinical features, hemodynamics, and prognosis with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension patients, who were matched by cardiac index, mean pulmonary arterial pressure, and pulmonary vascular resistance. We also compared the clinical characteristics of portal hypertension-post-splenectomy-pulmonary hypertension patients with eight portopulmonary hypertension patients. Compared with the matched idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension patients, the portal hypertension-post-splenectomy-pulmonary hypertension patients showed significantly wider red blood cell distribution width (16.7 ± 2.8% versus 13.3 ± 1.7%, p = 0.004), higher total bilirubin concentration (31.0 ± 13.8 µmol/l versus 18.9 ± 10.0 µmol/l, p = 0.010), and higher lactate dehydrogenase concentration (321.5 ± 41.2 IU/l versus 229.2 ± 69.4 IU/l, p = 0.001). Kaplan–Meier survival analyses showed that the portal hypertension-post-splenectomy-pulmonary hypertension patients tended to have poorer prognosis than the matched idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension patients (log-rank test: p = 0.010). Compared with the portal hypertension-post-splenectomy-pulmonary hypertension patients, the portopulmonary hypertension cohort appeared to exhibit poorer clinical conditions, including significantly lower mixed venous oxygen saturation (62.9 ± 8.0% versus 73.9 ± 6.5%, p = 0.004) and a significantly higher proportion of pericardial effusion (75.0% versus 8.3%, p = 0.004), even though the two cohorts showed similar hemodynamics. The mean intervals from diagnosis of portal hypertension to pulmonary hypertension in portopulmonary hypertension patients were significantly shorter than the intervals from splenectomy to diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension in portal hypertension-post-splenectomy-pulmonary hypertension patients (5.5 ± 5.2 years versus 13.1 ± 5.9 years, p = 0.008). Splenectomy might be involved in the initiation and development of pulmonary hypertension in patients with portal hypertension, although the precise mechanisms involved remain unknown. Portal hypertension-post-splenectomy-pulmonary hypertension patients might have poorer prognosis even with mild hemodynamics.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document