scholarly journals Etoposide Phosphate

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Etoposide Phosphate

Etoposide phosphate

2010 ◽  
pp. 236-238
Author(s):  
Ines Mader ◽  
Patrizia Fürst-Weger ◽  
Robert Mader ◽  
Elisabeth Nogler-Semenitz ◽  
Sabine Wassertheurer
Keyword(s):  
Etoposide Phosphate

Phase II randomized study of cisplatin plus etoposide phosphate or etoposide in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer.

1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1436-1442 ◽  
Author(s):  
J D Hainsworth ◽  
N Levitan ◽  
G L Wampler ◽  
C P Belani ◽  
M S Seyedsadr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Etoposide Phosphate ◽  
Molar Equivalent

PURPOSE This randomized phase II study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of etoposide phosphate when used in combination with cisplatin in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with previously untreated small-cell lung cancer were randomized to receive cisplatin in combination with either etoposide or etoposide phosphate. Molar-equivalent doses of etoposide and etoposide phosphate were used. Response rate, time to progression, survival, and toxicity were compared. RESULTS Major response rates with etoposide phosphate and etoposide were 61% (95% confidence interval, 55% to 67%) and 58% (95% confidence interval, 52% to 64%), respectively (P = .85). No significant differences in median time to progression or survival were observed in patients who received etoposide phosphate versus etoposide. Grade 3 and 4 leukopenia occurred in 63% of patients who received etoposide phosphate compared with 77% who received etoposide (P = .16). CONCLUSION The combination of etoposide phosphate and cisplatin is effective in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer, and can be administered with acceptable toxicity. Although this study was not designed to be a formal comparative trial, the efficacy and toxicity observed with this regimen were found to be similar to a standard etoposide/cisplatin regimen, using molar-equivalent etoposide doses. Because of its greater ease of administration, etoposide phosphate is preferable to etoposide for routine clinical use.

Phase I evaluation of a water-soluble etoposide prodrug, etoposide phosphate, given as a 5-minute infusion on days 1, 3, and 5 in patients with solid tumors.

1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 1902-1909 ◽  
Author(s):  
D R Budman ◽  
L N Igwemezie ◽  
S Kaul ◽  
J Behr ◽  
S Lichtman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Performance ◽  
Peak Plasma ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Plasma Concentrations ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Water Soluble ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Maximum Plasma ◽  
Rapid Infusion ◽  
Etoposide Phosphate

PURPOSE To determine the toxicities, maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), and pharmacology of etoposide phosphate, a water-soluble etoposide derivative, administered as a 5-minute intravenous infusion on a schedule of days 1, 3, and 5 repeated every 21 days. PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-six solid tumor patients with a mean age of 63 years, performance status of 0 to 1, WBC count > or = 4,000/microL, and platelet count > or = 100,000/microL, with normal hepatic and renal function were studied. Doses evaluated in etoposide equivalents were 50, 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, and 200 mg/m2/d. Etoposide in plasma and urine and etoposide phosphate in plasma were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Eleven of 36 patients were treated with concentrated etoposide phosphate at 150 mg/m2/d. RESULTS Grade I/II nausea, vomiting, alopecia, and fatigue were common. Leukopenia (mainly neutropenia) occurred at doses greater than 75 mg/m2, with the nadir occurring between days 15 and 19 posttreatment. All effects were reversible. Hypotension, bronchospasm, and allergic reactions were not observed in the first 25 patients. The MTD due to leukopenia was determined to be between 175 and 200 mg/m2/d. In 11 patients treated with concentrated etoposide phosphate, no local phlebitis was noted, but two patients did develop allergic phenomena. The conversion of etoposide phosphate to etoposide was not saturated in the dosages studied. Etoposide phosphate had peak plasma concentrations at 5 minutes, with a terminal half-life (t1/2) of 7 minutes. Etoposide reached peak concentrations at 7 to 8 minutes, with a t1/2 of 6 to 9 hours. Both etoposide phosphate and etoposide demonstrated dose-related linear increases in maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve (AUC). CONCLUSION Etoposide phosphate displays excellent patient tolerance in conventional dosages when administered as a 5-minute intravenous bolus. The suggested phase II dose is 150 mg/m2 on days 1, 3, and 5. The ability to administer etoposide phosphate as a concentrated, rapid infusion may prove of value both in the outpatient clinic and in high-dose regimens.

Etoposide bioavailability after oral administration of the prodrug etoposide phosphate in cancer patients during a phase I study.

1996 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 2020-2030 ◽  
Author(s):  
G G Chabot ◽  
J P Armand ◽  
C Terret ◽  
M de Forni ◽  
D Abigerges ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oral Dose ◽  
Oral Administration ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Maximum Concentration ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Data ◽  
Etoposide Phosphate ◽  
Poor Risk ◽  
Dose Dependent ◽  
Oral Prodrug

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to determine the bioavailability (F) of etoposide (E;VP-16) after oral administration of the water-soluble prodrug etoposide phosphate (EP;BMY-40481) during a phase I trial in cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-nine patients received oral EP (capsules, 50 to 150 mg/m2/d of E equivalent) for 5 days in week 1 (course 1), followed every 3 weeks thereafter by a daily intravenous (i.v.) infusion for 5 days of E (80 mg/m2, 1-hour i.v. infusion; course 2); in three patients, the i.v. E course was given before oral EP. Plasma and urine E pharmacokinetics (high-performance liquid chromatography [HPLC]) were performed on the first day of oral EP administration and on the first day of i.v. E. RESULTS Twenty-six of 29 patients completed two courses or more, whereas three patients received only one course due to toxicity. Myelosuppression was dose-dependent and dose-limiting, with grade 4 leukoneutropenia in four of 15 patients at 125 mg/m2 and in five of seven patients at 150 mg/m2. One patient died of meningeal hemorrhage related to grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Other toxicities were infrequent and/or manageable. No objective response was observed. The maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) is therefore 150 mg/m2, and the recommended oral dose of EP for phase II trials in this poor-risk patient population is 125 mg/m2. Twenty-six patients had pharmacokinetic data for both oral EP and i.v. E, whereas three had pharmacokinetic data on the i.v. E course only. After oral administration of EP, the pharmacokinetics of E were as follows: mean absorption rate constant (Ka), 1.7 +/- 1.7 h-1 (mean +/- SD); lag time, 0.3 +/- 0.2 hours; time of maximum concentration (t(max)), 1.6 +/- 0.8 hours; and mean half-lives (t1/2), 1.6 +/- 0.2 (first) and 10.3 +/- 5.8 hours (terminal); the increase in the area under the plasma concentration-versus-time curve (AUC) of E was proportional to the EP dose. After the 1-hour i.v. infusion of E, maximum concentration (C(max)) was 15 +/- 3 micrograms/mL; mean AUC, 88.0 +/- 22.0 micrograms.h/mL; mean total-body clearance (CL), 0.97 +/- 0.24 L/h/m2 (16.2 mL/min/m2); and mean t1/2, 0.9 +/- 0.6 (first) and 8.1 +/- 4.1 hours (terminal). The 24-hour urinary excretion of E after i.v. E was significantly higher (33%) compared with that of oral EP (17%) (P < .001). Significant correlation was observed between the neutropenia at nadir and the AUC of E after oral EP administration (r = .58, P < .01, sigmoid maximum effect [E(max)] model). The mean F of E after oral administration of EP in 26 patients was 68.0 +/- 17.9% (coefficient of variation [CV], 26.3%; F range, 35.5% to 111.8%). In this study, tumor type, as well as EP dose, did not significantly influence the F in E. There was no difference in F of E, whether oral EP was administered before or after i.v. E. Compared with literature data on oral E, the percent F in E after oral prodrug EP administration was 19% higher at either low ( < or = 100 mg/m2) or high ( > 100 mg/m2) doses. CONCLUSION Similarly to E, the main toxicity of the prodrug EP is dose-dependent leukoneutropenia, which is dose-limiting at the oral MTD of 150 mg/m2/d for 5 days. The recommended oral dose of EP is 125 mg/m2/d for 5 days every 3 weeks in poor-risk patients. Compared with literature data, oral EP has a 19% higher F value compared with oral E either at low or high doses. This higher F in E from oral prodrug EP appears to be a pharmacologic advantage that could be of potential pharmacodynamic importance for this drug.

scholarly journals Physical and chemical stability of a generic etoposide formulation as an alternative to etoposide phosphate

2020 ◽  
Vol 178 ◽  
pp. 112896 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hassane Sadou Yayé ◽  
Lamia Hassani ◽  
Philippe-Henri Secrétan ◽  
Martine Babiard ◽  
Haroun Aouati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chemical Stability ◽  
Etoposide Phosphate ◽  
Physical And Chemical

Etoposide phosphate, the water soluble prodrug of etoposide

1996 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 163-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. H. I. Witterland ◽  
C. H. W. Koks ◽  
J. H. Beijnen
Keyword(s):  
Water Soluble ◽  
Etoposide Phosphate
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document