scholarly journals Cahn-Ingold-Prelog Priority System

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Priority System

Nutrition priority system: A model for patient care

1987 ◽  
Vol 87 (2) ◽  
pp. 200-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen Wachter McClusky ◽  
Ligia Fishel ◽  
Rebecca Stover-May
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
System A ◽  
Priority System

Priority System and Information Workflow for BHLS Services: An Interregional Project Between Italy and Germany

2010 ◽  
pp. 387-398
Author(s):  
Saverio Gini ◽  
Giorgio Ambrosino ◽  
Paolo Frosini ◽  
Fabio Schoen ◽  
Heribert Kirschfink
Keyword(s):  
Priority System

Special Topics in Queueing Theory

2018 ◽  
pp. 212-254
Keyword(s):  
Queueing Theory ◽  
Finite Population ◽  
Service Process ◽  
Batch Service ◽  
Priority Level ◽  
Priority System ◽  
Priority Systems ◽  
The One ◽  
Number Of Customers

Topics covered in Chapter 7 are priority systems with preemptive or non-preemptive system, systems with N classes of customers, customers in groups: bulk arrivals, batch service, balking and reneging, and finite population. In a priority system, it is assumed that there are 1, 2, 3, …, N different classes or types of customers, where Type 1 customers are the most important while class N ones are the least important. When a server is available to serve a customer from the queue, the one with the highest priority level will go to the server to start their service process. In batch service, before starting the service process, a group or batch needs to be formed with a certain number of customers.

Turn Taking in E-Mail Discussions

2011 ◽  
pp. 755-772 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Harrison
Keyword(s):  
Common Method ◽  
Naturally Occurring ◽  
Priority System ◽  
Turn Taking ◽  
Current Speaker ◽  
E Mail

This chapter investigates turn taking in naturally occurring e-mail discussions. In e-mail discussions, participants can self select to contribute at any time, turns cannot be interrupted, and adjacency cannot be guaranteed. However, participants engage in recognisable discussions and “speaker” change occurs. Patterns of turn taking can be observed in the data, and there are many parallels with spoken conversation. In e-mail discussions, the current participant may select a new participant, and those selected usually respond; participants may self select (the most common method of turn taking); and the current participant may choose to continue, either by writing an extended turn or by sending separate consecutive messages. Response is not obligatory unless a respondent has been specified. There is no priority system through which a change of participant takes priority. Because there is less pressure toward current speaker selects last, the system encourages multiple participants to engage in the discussion.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document