scholarly journals KRAS Exon 2 Mutation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Exon 2 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Awidi ◽  
Nidaa Ababneh ◽  
Maha Shomaf ◽  
Feras Al Fararjeh ◽  
Laila Owaidi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background A constitutively active RAS protein in the absence of stimulation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is the result of mutations in KRAS and NRAS genes. Mutations in the KRAS exon 2 and outside exon 2 have been found to predict the resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal therapy. A substantial proportion of metastatic colorectal cancer cases (mCRC) exhibit RAS mutations outside KRAS exon 2, particularly in KRAS exon 3 and 4 and NRAS exons 2, 3. No data about RAS mutations outside KRAS exon 2 are available for Jordanian patients with mCRC. We aim to study the molecular spectrum, frequency, and distribution pattern of KRAS and NRAS mutations in Jordanian patients with mCRC. Methods A cohort of 190 Jordanian metastatic colorectal cancer patients were enrolled in the trial. We detected mutations in exon 2 of the KRAS and NRAS gene as well as mutations outside of exon 2 using the StripAssay technique. The KRAS StripAssay covered 29 mutations and 22 NRAS mutations. Results Mutations were observed in 92 (48.42%) cases, and KRAS exon 2 accounted for 76 cases (83.69%). KRAS G12D was the most common mutation, occurring in 18 cases, followed by KRAS G12A in 16 cases, and G12T in 13 cases. Mutations outside of KRAS exon 2 represented 16.3% of the mutated cases. Among those, 6 cases (6.48%) carried mutations in NRAS exon 2, 3 and 10 cases (10.87%) in KRAS exon 3 and 4. Conclusion The frequency of NRAS and KRAS mutations outside of exon 2 appears to be higher in Jordanian patients in comparison with patients from western countries. KRAS mutations outside of exon 2 should be tested routinely to identify patients who should not be treated with anti-EGFR antibodies.


2019 ◽  
Vol 121 (5) ◽  
pp. 378-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Elez ◽  
Carles Pericay ◽  
Manuel Valladares-Ayerbes ◽  
Inmaculada Bando ◽  
Maria Jose Safont ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 3437-3446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hung‐Chih Hsu ◽  
Yu‐Chun Liu ◽  
Chuang‐Wei Wang ◽  
Wen-Chi Chou ◽  
Yu-Jen Hsu ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3549-3549
Author(s):  
Julien Taïeb ◽  
Jean-François Emile ◽  
Karine Le Malicot ◽  
Aziz Zaanan ◽  
Josep Tabernero ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 705-705
Author(s):  
Timothy Jay Price ◽  
Marc Peeters ◽  
Tae Won Kim ◽  
Jin Li ◽  
Stefano Cascinu ◽  
...  

705 Background: ASPECCT met its primary endpoint of non-inferiority of overall survival (OS) of pmab vs. cmab. We evaluate outcomes by hypomag, an on-treatment, anti-EGFR related adverse event that develops due to the inhibition of EGFR function. Conflicting reports have suggested hypomag is associated with survival. Methods: Patients with previously treated WT KRAS exon 2 mCRC were randomized 1:1 to receive pmab or cmab. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority of OS. Progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) were secondary endpoints. Patients were categorized ± any grade hypomag during the study and data analyzed by treatment arm. Analysis of Mg supplementation during hypomag was not conducted. Results: 999 patients were randomized and treated: 499 pmab, 500 cmab. Any grade hypomag was 28.8% and grade ≥3 was 7.3% in the pmab arm vs. 18.9% and 2.6% in the cmab arm, respectively. Median time to first hypomag onset was 82 days in the pmab arm and 57 days in the cmab arm. In the pmab arm, 1.0% of patients discontinued treatment and 5% of patients had dose modifications due to hypomag vs. <0.5% and 3% in the cmab arm, respectively. Results are shown (Table). Conclusions: In ASPECCT, rates of hypomag were higher in the pmab vs. the cmab arm. Patients who developed any grade hypomag with pmab or cmab had higher ORR, PFS, and OS compared with those patients who did not. Clinical trial information: NCT00788957. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document