scholarly journals High Risk Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index Combined Biologic Index

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Mantle Cell

scholarly journals Bendamustine and rituximab as induction therapy in both transplant-eligible and -ineligible patients with mantle cell lymphoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (15) ◽  
pp. 3486-3494
Author(s):  
Diego Villa ◽  
Laurie H. Sehn ◽  
Kerry J. Savage ◽  
Cynthia L. Toze ◽  
Kevin Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
First Line ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Historical Cohort ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Mantle Cell

Abstract Rituximab-containing chemotherapy regimens constitute standard first-line therapy for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Since June 2013, 190 patients ≥18 years of age with MCL in British Columbia have been treated with bendamustine and rituximab (BR). The overall response rate to BR was 88% (54% complete response). Of these, 61 of 89 patients (69%) aged ≤65 years received autologous stem cell transplantation and 141 of 190 patients (74%) from the entire cohort received maintenance rituximab. Twenty-three patients (12%) had progressive disease, associated with high risk per the Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (MIPI), Ki-67 ≥50%, and blastoid/pleomorphic histology. Outcomes were compared with a historical cohort of 248 patients treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP; January 2003 to May 2013). Treatment with BR was associated with significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS), but not overall survival (OS), compared with R-CHOP in the whole cohort (3-year PFS, 66% BR vs 51% R-CHOP, P = .003; 3-year OS, 73% BR vs 66% R-CHOP, P = .054) and in those >65 years of age (3-year PFS, 56% BR vs 35% R-CHOP, P = .001; 3-year OS, 64% BR vs 55% R-CHOP, P = .063). Outcomes in transplanted patients were not statistically significantly different compared with R-CHOP (3-year PFS, 85% BR vs 76% R-CHOP, P = .135; 3-year OS, 90% BR vs 88% R-CHOP, P = .305), although in multivariate analyses, treatment with BR was associated with improved PFS (hazard ratio, 0.40 [95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.94]; P = .036) but not OS. BR is an effective first-line option for most patients with MCL, however, outcomes are suboptimal for those with high-risk features and further studies integrating novel agents are warranted.

Validation of the Mantle Cell Lymphoma Prognostic Index (MIPI): A Valuable Tool for Risk Stratification in Mantle Cell Lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2703-2703
Author(s):  
Stephen Douglas Smith ◽  
Eric D. Hsi ◽  
Brian J. Bolwell ◽  
Amanda Maggiotto ◽  
Meagan Effinger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Mantle Cell

Abstract Abstract 2703 Poster Board II-679 Introduction: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an incurable disease with a highly variable course. Improvements in therapy have been impeded by the lack of a universal prognostic model, making risk stratification and comparisons across clinical trials difficult. The International Prognostic Index (IPI) and Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) have been applied but show limitations in MCL, especially in distinguishing low and intermediate-risk patients (pts). The MIPI (Mantle Cell International Prognostic Index) was developed to overcome these limitations, and is based on WBC, age, and LDH (analyzed as continuous variables) and ECOG performance status.1 However, the MIPI has yet to be independently validated, and failed to predict outcome of MCL pts treated with Hyper-CVAD.2 To examine the prognostic capacity of the MIPI, we reviewed outcomes of pts diagnosed with MCL from 1998–2008 at the Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute (CCTCI). Methods: Cases of MCL diagnosed at CCTCI were identified from our pathology database, yielding 85 unique pts. These subjects were retrospectively analyzed with approval of our Institutional Review Board. A total of 48 pts with advanced stage disease who underwent immediate treatment (within 90 days of diagnosis), and for whom adequate data for assignment of both MIPI and IPI existed, were the subject of review. Survival was identified from medical records and confirmed using a public social security database. Outcomes were compared using log-rank analysis of Kaplan-Meier survival analyses, and MIPI was calculated in accordance with the initial publication.1 Results: Pt characteristics at diagnosis were: median age 62 (range 39–85), 73% male, 75% ECOG performance status of 0-1, 96% stage IV disease, 52% elevated LDH, and 40% had extranodal involvement other than bone marrow (23% with GI involvement). Six pts had the blastoid variant of MCL. IPI scores at diagnosis were as follows: low (17%)/ low-intermediate (31%)/ high-int (25%)/ high (27%). MIPI scores at diagnosis were: low (33%) / int (25%)/ high(42%). Initial treatment included an anthracycline in 71% and rituximab in 60%. HyperCVAD was given 33%, and 23% underwent upfront (CR1/PR1) autologous transplantation. Median follow-up of survivors is 5.7 years. Median OS and RFS for all pts is 3.9 and 2.5 years, respectively. The IPI distinguished low and high-risk groups, but low-int and high-int groups were closely approximated (Figure 1). On the other hand, the MIPI distinguished 3 separate groups (Figure 2), including a high risk group with a 5-year survival of 11%. The MIPI maintained its prognostic capacity even in HyperCVAD-treated pts (log rank p=.01 for low/int/high MIPI among 16 pts, figure not shown.) The use of regimens including rituximab was not associated with improved OS (log rank p=0.21, comparing rituximab at any time vs none, figure not shown). Conclusions: Based on long-term follow-up of 48 pts diagnosed with MCL at CCTCI from 1998–2008, we verified the accuracy and ease of application of the MIPI for determining prognosis in MCL. On further analysis, rituximab did not impact OS of MCL pts. Clinical trials in MCL should employ the MIPI as a risk-stratification tool, and novel approaches are urgently needed for pts in the high-risk group. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

The Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (MIPI) is superior to the International Prognostic Index (IPI) in predicting survival following intensive first-line immunochemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT)

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 115 (8) ◽  
pp. 1530-1533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian H. Geisler ◽  
Arne Kolstad ◽  
Anna Laurell ◽  
Riikka Räty ◽  
Mats Jerkeman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
First Line ◽  
Mantle Cell

Abstract Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) has a heterogeneous clinical course. The recently proposed Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (MIPI) predicted the survival of MCL better than the International Prognostic Index in MCL patients treated with conventional chemotherapy, but its validity in MCL treated with more intensive immunochemotherapy has been questioned. Applied here to 158 patients of the Nordic MCL2 trial of first-line intensive immunochemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation, the MIPI and the simplified MIPI (s-MIPI) predicted survival significantly better (P < .001) than the International Prognostic Index (P > .004). Both the MIPI and the s-MIPI mainly identified 2 risk groups, low and intermediate versus high risk, with the more easily applied s-MIPI being just as powerful as the MIPI. The MIPIB (biological), incorporating Ki-67 expression, identified almost half of the patients as high risk. We suggest that also a simplified MIPIB is feasible. This trial was registered at www.isrctn.org as #ISRCTN 87866680.

scholarly journals Molecular profiling and management of mantle cell lymphoma

Hematology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia Ruan
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Molecular Profiling ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Mantle Cell

Abstract Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a distinct subtype of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma characterized by the t(11;14)(q13;q32) translocation leading to cyclin D1 overexpression and cell cycle dysregulation. Molecular profiling with gene expression and deep sequencing analyses has identified genomic and epigenomic alterations in pathways regulating the cell cycle, DNA damage response, proliferation, and survival, which contribute to disease progression with important prognostic and therapeutic implications. Clinically, the nonnodal MCL subset is notable for leukemic presentation, indolent behavior, and association with hypermutated IGHV and lack of SOX11 expression, which differentiates it from the conventional nodal MCL. In addition to the Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index score and proliferative gene signatures, 17p/TP53 and 9p/CDKN2A alterations, and genomic complexity have emerged as clinically useful biomarkers of high-risk disease associated with aggressive disease behavior, resistance to chemotherapy, and poor overall survival. Although intensive chemoimmunotherapy regimens that incorporate high-dose cytarabine and stem cell transplantation have improved survival in young and fit MCL patients, the introduction of Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors and other novel agents has made effective outpatient-based treatment accessible to nearly all MCL patients. Optimizing combinations of novel agents in the relapsed setting and moving novel agents to the first-line setting have the potential to fundamentally change the MCL therapeutic landscape for the better, especially for patients ineligible for chemotherapy or those with high-risk mutations that are resistant to chemotherapy.

scholarly journals Clinical characteristics and outcomes of primary versus secondary gastrointestinal mantle cell lymphoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessia Castellino ◽  
Aung M. Tun ◽  
Yucai Wang ◽  
Thomas M. Habermann ◽  
Rebecca L. King ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Local Therapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Multiple Lesions ◽  
Mantle Cell

AbstractPrimary gastrointestinal (GI) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is rare and the optimal management is unknown. We reviewed 800 newly diagnosed MCL cases and found 22 primary (2.8%) and 79 (9.9%) secondary GI MCL cases. Age, sex, and performance status were similar between primary and secondary cases. Secondary cases had more elevations in lactate dehydrogenase (28% vs 0%, P = 0.03) and a trend for a higher MCL international prognostic index (P = 0.07). Observation or local therapy was more common for primary GI MCL (29% vs 8%, P < 0.01), and autologous stem-cell transplant was more common for secondary GI MCL (35% vs 14%, P < 0.05). The median follow-up was 85 months. Primary and secondary GI MCL had similar 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) (30% vs 28%, P = 0.59) and overall survival (OS) (65% vs 66%, P = 0.83). The extent of GI involvement in primary GI MCL affected treatment selection but not outcome, with a 5-year PFS of 43% vs 14% vs 31% (P = 0.48) and OS of 57% vs 71% vs 69% (P = 0.54) in cases with single lesion vs multiple lesions in 1 organ vs multiple lesions in ≥2 organs. Less aggressive frontline treatment for primary GI MCL is reasonable. It is unknown whether more aggressive treatment can result in improved outcomes.

Using the primary site as a prognostic tool for nodal mantle cell lymphoma: a SEER-based study

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 861-876
Author(s):  
Mohamed Gomaa Kamel ◽  
Amr Ehab El-Qushayri ◽  
Ahmed Kamal Sayed ◽  
Nguyen Tien Huy
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Primary Site ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Multiple Regions ◽  
Using Data

Background: Nodal mantle cell lymphoma (NMCL) has a worse survival than extra-nodal mantle cell lymphoma. Materials & methods: A cohort study was conducted to evaluate the primary site role as a mortality predictor using data from 1983 to 2011 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Results: Most patients had NMCL in multiple regions (71.9%). There was a significantly increased incidence of NMCL cases over years with 83.2% of them occurred between 1998 and 2011. The mean survival was 52.9 months with overall survival/cancer-specific survival rate of 29.2/42.9%, respectively. Lymph nodes of intrathoracic and multiple regions had a worse overall survival while the head, face and neck, intra-abdominal, pelvic, inguinal region and leg as well as multiple regions had worse cancer-specific survival. Conclusion: NMCL primary site can serve as a prognostic factor. We encourage adding it to MCL International Prognostic Index.

Outcome of Deferred Initial Therapy in Mantle-Cell Lymphoma

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 1209-1213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Martin ◽  
Amy Chadburn ◽  
Paul Christos ◽  
Karen Weil ◽  
Richard R. Furman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Observation Group ◽  
Watch And Wait ◽  
Time To Treatment ◽  
Social Security Death Index ◽  
Mantle Cell

Purpose Treatment of mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL) is nonstandardized, though patients are commonly treated immediately at diagnosis. Because data on observation, or “watch and wait,” have not been previously reported, we analyzed the outcome of deferred initial therapy. Patients and Methods Inclusion criteria in this retrospective analysis were a diagnosis of MCL between 1997 and 2007 and known date of first treatment. Hospital and research charts were reviewed for prognostic and treatment-related information. Date of death was derived from hospital records and confirmed using an online Social Security death index. Results Of 97 patients with MCL evaluated at Weill Cornell Medical Center, 31 patients (32%) were observed for more than 3 months before initial systemic therapy, with median time to treatment for the observation group of 12 months (range, 4 to 128 months). The observation group (median follow-up, 55 months) had a median age of 58 years (range, 40 to 81 years). Prognostic factors in assessable patients included advanced stage (III/IV) in 75%, elevated lactate dehydrogenase in 25%, and intermediate- or high-risk Mantle Cell International Prognostic Index in 54%. Better performance status and lower-risk standard International Prognostic Index scores were more commonly present in those undergoing observation. Although time to treatment did not predict overall survival in a multivariate analysis, the survival profile of the observation group was statistically superior to that of the early treatment group (not reached v 64 months, P = .004). Conclusion In selected asymptomatic patients with MCL, deferred initial treatment (“watch and wait”) is an acceptable management approach.

Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Prognostic Capacity of the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 1910-1910
Author(s):  
Michael B. Moller ◽  
Niels T. Pedersen ◽  
Bjarne E. Christensen
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Predictive Capacity ◽  
Mantle Cell

Abstract Background: The International Prognostic Index (IPI) is the most commonly used prognostic model in mantle cell lymphoma. However, the prognostic value of IPI is limited. The recently published Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) is built on variables (age, stage, lactic dehydrogenase, anemia, and nodal disease) which also are pertinent to mantle cell lymphoma. This study was conducted to evaluate the prognostic value of FLIPI in patients with mantle cell lymphoma. Patients and Methods: A population-based series of 93 patients with mantle cell lymphoma diagnosed in a 7-year period were studied. End points of the study were response to therapy, overall survival, and failure-free survival according to IPI and FLIPI. Results: Applied to the whole series, FLIPI identified 3 risk groups with markedly different outcome with 5-year overall survival rates of 65%, 42%, and 8%, respectively (P < .0001; log-rank 28.13; figure below). Notably, the high-risk group comprised 53% of patients. In contrast, IPI only allocated 16% of cases to the high-risk group and had a lower overall predictive capacity (log-rank 24.8). When both FLIPI and IPI were included in a multivariate analysis, only FLIPI was related to survival. In patients treated with CHOP-based regimens (n = 45) FLIPI also had superior predictive capacity compared to IPI (log-rank, 18.51 versus 11.37), and again only FLIPI retained significance in multivariate analysis. Multivariate analysis of failure-free survival also identified FLIPI, and not IPI, as independently significant. Conclusion: FLIPI is the superior prognostic model as compared to IPI and should be the preferred clinical prognostic index in mantle cell lymphoma. Overall survival according to FLIPI risk groups Overall survival according to FLIPI risk groups

The Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (MIPI) at Diagnosis Is Associated with Survival of Mantle Cell Lymphoma Patients Undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 1143-1143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lihua Pan ◽  
Katherine A Guthrie ◽  
Brian G. Till ◽  
Oliver W. Press ◽  
John M. Pagel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Wbc Count

Abstract Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) exhibits short remission durations and a poor prognosis. To improve on these outcomes, many have advocated the use of high-dose therapy (HDT) and ASCT. The MIPI predicts overall survival (OS) from diagnosis, yet it remains unknown if the MIPI assessed at diagnosis (MIPI-Dx) or prior to transplant (MIPI-Tx) can be used to predict OS from ASCT. To address this question we retrospectively evaluated the association of the MIPI-Dx and MIPI-Tx, and other characteristics with OS following HDT and ASCT in 87 consecutive MCL patients transplanted at our center. Baseline characteristics included: median age at diagnosis=56 years (range, 35–70), median age at transplant=57 years (range, 35 – 70), stage III-IV=97%, median LDH/upper limit of normal (ULN) at diagnosis=0.91 (range, 0.46–5.65), median LDH/ULN at transplant= 0.88 (range, 0.39–3.00), median white blood cell (WBC) count at diagnosis=7.50 x 109 / liter (range, 1.40 – 54.70), mean WBC count at transplant=4.66 x 109 /liter (range, 0.07 – 17.60), median number of prior chemotherapy regimens=2 (range, 1–5). The estimated 5-year OS and PFS for the entire cohort were 56% (95% CI, 39–73%) and 45% (95% CI, 30 – 60%), respectively with a median follow up among surviving patients of 2.0 years (range 0.1 – 10.1 years). The MIPI-Dx was a better predictor of OS (p&lt;0.001) than MIPI-Tx (p=0.09), when evaluated as a continuous variable. Similarly, when stratified as a categorical variable, the MIPI-Dx (p=0.09) was superior to the MIPI-Tx (p=0.34) in estimating survival. When compared to patients with a MIPI-Dx of 0–2, those with a score of 3, 4, and 5–8 at diagnosis had a 3.3 (95% CI 0.3–32, p=0.3), 6.1 (95% CI 0.7–54.8, p=0.11), and 11.1 (95% CI 1.3–92.9, p=0.03) fold higher risk of mortality after transplant, respectively (Figure). We next determined if any pre-transplant factors could improve our ability to predict outcome after ASCT. Multivariable modeling identified pretransplant factors of ECOG PS &gt;0 (hazard ratio (HR) of 3.0, p=0.03), number of prior regimens &gt;2 (HR 5.2, p=0.01), lack of complete remission (CR) (HR 3.4, p=0.04), and elevated LDH (HR 4.4, p=0.01) as associated with higher risk of death after transplant. These results indicate that the MIPI-Dx is a robust prognostic tool that can even be used to predict outcomes after a later transplant, suggesting that it may continue to reflect the biology of an individual patient’s disease over time. Further assessment of survival predictions after ASCT can be made independently by examining pre-transplant factors including performance status, number of prior regimens, attainment of CR, and LDH. Though these data require prospective validation, our results can be used to counsel patients about outcomes and account for potential differences in results from clinical trials of HDT and ASCT for MCL. Figure Figure

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document