Prevalence of and factors associated with musculoskeletal symptoms in the spine attributed to computer use in undergraduate students

Work ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 497-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siriluck Kanchanomai ◽  
Prawit Janwantanakul ◽  
Praneet Pensri ◽  
Wiroj Jiamjarasrangsi
Author(s):  
Arturo García-Santıllán ◽  
María del Socorro Flóres-Serrano ◽  
José Satsumi López-Morales ◽  
Lucía Rios- Alvarez

Work ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
pp. 5624-5626
Author(s):  
Eunice Tokars ◽  
Antonio Renato Pereira Moro ◽  
Gabriel Grabner dos Santos

1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 387-405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miika Marttunen

This article reports a study in which thirty-one undergraduate students practiced academic argumentation by electronic mail (e-mail). In the two “tutorled” e-mail study groups the discussion topics were selected by the tutor, while in the two self-directed “student-led” groups selection was by the students. The quantity and quality of student-student interaction, and the factors associated with this were investigated. The results indicated that 42 percent of the students' messages (n = 441) were interactive in nature, indicating at least one reference to fellow students' messages. When difficult contents were addressed, interaction in the tutor-led groups was more common than in the student-led groups. The student-student interaction was mainly non-argumentative: 62 percent of the students' references (n = 259) expressed something other than the taking a position, 24 percent agreement, 10 percent grounded disagreement, and 4 percent non-grounded disagreement. The students in the student-led groups grounded their disagreement more often, while the students in the tutor-led groups more often expressed agreement. The study supports the superiority of the student-led mode of e-mail studying over the tutor-led mode when promoting argumentative dialogue.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document