scholarly journals Evaluating the effectiveness of Facebook to impact the knowledge of evidence-based employment practices by individuals with traumatic brain injury: A knowledge translation random control study

Work ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-81
Author(s):  
Katherine J. Inge ◽  
Carolyn W. Graham ◽  
James W. McLaughlin ◽  
Doug Erickson ◽  
Paul Wehman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Knowledge Translation ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Employment Practices ◽  
Random Control ◽  
Control Study

Does Sleep Bruxism Contribute to Headache-Related Disability After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury? A Case-Control Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 306-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshitaka Suzuki ◽  
Caroline Arbour ◽  
Samar Khoury ◽  
Jean-François Giguère ◽  
Ronald Denis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Mild Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Case Control Study ◽  
Sleep Bruxism ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Control Study

806 Barriers to screening and diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea during inpatient traumatic brain injury rehabilitation

SLEEP ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. A314-A315
Author(s):  
Bridget Cotner ◽  
Risa Nakase-Richardson ◽  
Becky Gius ◽  
Lauren Fournier ◽  
Alexa Watach ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Obstructive Sleep Apnea ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Sleep Apnea ◽  
Inpatient Rehabilitation ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Diagnostic Tools ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Implementation Barriers ◽  
Obstructive Sleep

Abstract Introduction Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) is prevalent after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and may diminish recovery when left untreated. Despite the demonstrated importance of treating OSA following TBI, assessment for OSA during or soon after inpatient rehabilitation for TBI is limited. Little is known about barriers to implementing OSA screening and early diagnosis during inpatient rehabilitation thus hindering the translation of evidence-based OSA assessment procedures into clinical practice and potentially delaying necessary OSA treatment. The current analysis explored facilitators and barriers to implementing OSA screening tools in an inpatient rehabilitation setting from the perspectives of end user stakeholders. Methods Patients, families, industry, clinical providers and administrators participated in a two-day meeting following completion of a diagnostic clinical trial of OSA screening and diagnostic tools during inpatient rehabilitation. Stakeholders were provided with open ended questions generated by study investigators and given the opportunity to respond on paper or a “graffiti wall” (i.e., white board). Example questions include “What are the greatest needs of the healthcare system related to sleep apnea and TBI?” and “What are the key things we need to consider to move results into real-world practice?” Qualitative content analyses using a rapid matrix approach were conducted from stakeholder feedback obtained during the two-day meeting, which included a guided review of emerging OSA research and discussion of potential implementation barriers of OSA assessment during inpatient rehabilitation. Results Improved screening and treatment practices for OSA were the greatest needs identified. To meet these needs, stakeholders identified the importance of improving patient, family, and staff understanding of OSA (e.g., health literacy) and other sleep disorders through education; inpatient rehabilitation access to resources (technology; sleep providers); and reimbursement for additional inpatient procedures. Conclusion Although treatment of OSA is crucial for recovery during inpatient rehabilitation following TBI, barriers to earlier recognition, diagnosis, and treatment of OSA exists across several different domains, including education, resources, and funding policies. Findings support future implementation efforts to translate evidence-based care into practice to improve patient outcomes. Support (if any) PCORI-NCT03033901

scholarly journals Outcome of children with severe traumatic brain injury who are treated with decompressive craniectomy

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 508-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maroun J. Mhanna ◽  
Wael EI Mallah ◽  
Margaret Verrees ◽  
Rajiv Shah ◽  
Dennis M. Super
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Decompressive Craniectomy ◽  
Cerebral Edema ◽  
Severe Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Case Control Study ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Severe Tbi ◽  
Control Study

OBJECT Decompressive craniectomy (DC) for the management of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is controversial. The authors sought to determine if DC improves the outcome of children with severe TBI. METHODS In a retrospective, case-control study, medical records of all patients admitted to the pediatric ICU between May 1998 and May 2008 with severe TBI and treated with DC were identified and matched to patients who were treated medically without DC. Medical records were reviewed for patients’ demographic data and baseline characteristics. RESULTS During the study period, 17 patients with severe TBI treated with DC at a median of 2 hours (interquartile range [IQR] 1–14 hours) after admission were identified and matched to 17 contemporary controls. On admission, there were no differences between DC and control patients regarding age (10.2 ± 5.9 years vs 12.4 ± 5.4 years, respectively [mean ± SD]), sex, weight, Glasgow Coma Scale score (median 5 [IQR 3–7] vs 4 [IQR 3–6], respectively; p = 0.14), or the highest intracranial pressure (median 42 [IQR 22–54] vs 30 [IQR 21–36], respectively; p = 0.77). However, CT findings were significant for a higher rate of herniation and cerebral edema among patients with DC versus controls (7/17 vs 2/17, respectively, had herniation [p = 0.05] and 14/17 vs 6/17, respectively, had cerebral edema [p = 0.006]). Overall there were no significant differences in survival between patients with DC and controls (71% [12/17] vs 82% [14/17], respectively; p = 0.34). However, among survivors, at 4 years (IQR 1–6 years) after the TBI, 42% (5/12) of the DC patients had mild disability or a Glasgow Outcome Scale score of 5 vs none (0/14) of the controls (p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS In this retrospective, small case-control study, the authors have shown that early DC in pediatric patients with severe TBI improves outcome in survivors. Future prospective randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document