scholarly journals An investigation of the inter-rater reliability of the Valpar Joule functional capacity evaluation in healthy adults

Work ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 337-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dawn Mitchell ◽  
Elizabeth Hancock ◽  
Lyndsay Alexander
Keyword(s):  
Functional Capacity ◽  
Functional Capacity Evaluation ◽  
Healthy Adults ◽  
Rater Reliability ◽  
Capacity Evaluation

scholarly journals An evaluation of the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of OccuPro’s functional capacity evaluation

Work ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 465-473
Author(s):  
Carrie Scheel ◽  
Jim Mecham ◽  
Vic Zuccarello ◽  
Ryan Mattes
Keyword(s):  
Functional Capacity ◽  
Functional Capacity Evaluation ◽  
Rater Reliability ◽  
Capacity Evaluation

Clinical Update: Functional Capacity Evaluations and Disability

1998 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 4-5
Author(s):  
Glenn Pransky
Keyword(s):  
Direct Observation ◽  
Functional Capacity ◽  
Work Capacity ◽  
Functional Capacity Evaluation ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Validity Of Results ◽  
Job Tasks ◽  
Capacity Evaluation ◽  
Physical Abilities ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract According to the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, a functional capacity evaluation (FCE) measures an individual's physical abilities via a set of activities in a structured setting and provides objective data about the relationship between an impairment and maximal ability to perform work activities. A key distinction between FCEs and self-reported activities of daily living is that the former involve direct observation by professional evaluators. Numerous devices can quantify the physical function of a specific part of the musculoskeletal system but do not address the performance of whole body tasks in the workplace, and these devices have not been shown to predict accurately the ability to perform all but the simplest job tasks. Information about reliability has been proposed as a way to identify magnification and malingering, but variability due to pain and poor comprehension of instructions may cause variations in assessments. Structured work capacity evaluations involve a set of activities but likely underestimate the individual's ability to do jobs that involve complex or varying activities. Job simulations involve direct observation of an individual performing actual job tasks, require a skilled and experienced evaluator, and raise questions about expense, time, objectivity and validity of results, and interpretation of results in terms of the ability to perform specific jobs. To understand the barriers to return to work, examiners must supplement FCEs with information regarding workplace environment, accommodations, and demotivators.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document