Building a prototype using Human-Centered Design to engage older adults in healthcare decision-making

Work ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 653-661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajit Kumar ◽  
Sanjeev Maskara ◽  
I-Jen Chiang
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Healthcare Decision ◽  
Human Centered Design ◽  
Healthcare Decision Making

scholarly journals Literacy Mediates Racial Differences in Financial and Healthcare Decision Making in Older Adults

2020 ◽  
Vol 68 (6) ◽  
pp. 1279-1285 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Duke Han ◽  
Lisa L. Barnes ◽  
Sue Leurgans ◽  
Lei Yu ◽  
David A. Bennett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Racial Differences ◽  
Healthcare Decision ◽  
Healthcare Decision Making

scholarly journals Value Assessment in Healthcare Decision-Making of Ethnically and Cognitively Diverse Older Adults

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 1260-1260
Author(s):  
A Mejia ◽  
G D Smith ◽  
R E Curiel ◽  
W Barker ◽  
R Behar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Focus Groups ◽  
Family Involvement ◽  
Medical Decision ◽  
Value Assessment ◽  
Healthcare Decision ◽  
Medical Decisions ◽  
Healthcare Decision Making ◽  
Normal Cognition

Abstract Objective Little is known regarding the values that patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) incorporate into healthcare decision-making or how culture may affect such values. Even if values overlap across cultures, cultural groups may emphasize the importance of specific values differently since values emanate, at least in part, from cultural and life-long learning. The aim of this study was to explore and compare values that older adults of different ethnicities and cognitive statuses incorporate in their medical decisions. Participants and Method Four focus groups were established by identifying older adults as, a) Hispanic or non-Hispanic, and with b) normal cognition or MCI. Participants were recruited from the 1Florida Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center. Focus groups were audio-recorded and transcribed using a professional transcription service. Results There were a total of 23 participants (Age: M = 70.9, SD = 6.4). MCI groups had briefer discussions (Time M = 44 minutes) than the normal cognition groups (Time M = 62 minutes). Qualitative analysis of discussions was used to explore the values identified across the focus groups. The MCI groups valued spirituality, doctor recommendations, and family involvement when facing medical decisions. Normal cognition groups valued the necessity of proactive involvement as healthcare consumers and the relationship between the quality of patient-clinician interaction and their health care related decisions. Cultural themes involving perceptions of gender and generational differences emerged from the Hispanic normal cognition group. Conclusions This study identified many determinants influencing the medical decision-making process of diverse older adults: including past experiences, family involvement, healthcare barriers, and cultural background. These results have the potential to impact patient-clinician discussions, decisions made by surrogates, and the development of decision aids with a broader range of relevant patient values.

scholarly journals Older Adults’ Recognition of Trade-Offs in Healthcare Decision-Making

2015 ◽  
Vol 63 (8) ◽  
pp. 1658-1662 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siobhan M. Case ◽  
John O'Leary ◽  
Nancy Kim ◽  
Mary E. Tinetti ◽  
Terri R. Fried
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Healthcare Decision ◽  
Trade Offs ◽  
Healthcare Decision Making

Patient values in healthcare decision making among diverse older adults

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea M. Kurasz ◽  
Glenn E. Smith ◽  
Rosie E. Curiel ◽  
Warren W. Barker ◽  
Raquel C. Behar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Healthcare Decision ◽  
Healthcare Decision Making ◽  
Patient Values

scholarly journals Nursing Home Staff’s Perceptions of Healthcare Decision Making for Unbefriended Residents

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 384-384
Author(s):  
Hyejin Kim ◽  
Molly Perkins ◽  
Thaddeus Pope ◽  
Patricia Comer ◽  
Mi-Kyung Song
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Geographic Area ◽  
Care Physician ◽  
Healthcare Decision ◽  
Do Not Resuscitate ◽  
Best Interest ◽  
Care Plans ◽  
Course Of Action ◽  
Healthcare Decision Making ◽  
Facility Level

Abstract ‘Unbefriended’ adults are those who lack decision-making capacity and have no surrogates or advance care plans. Little data exist on nursing homes (NHs)’ healthcare decision-making practices for unbefriended residents. This study aimed to describe NH staff’s perceptions of healthcare decision making on behalf of unbefriended residents. Sixty-six staff including administrators, physicians, nurses, and social workers from three NHs in one geographic area of Georgia, USA participated in a 31-item survey. Their responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and conventional content analysis. Of 66 participants, eleven had been involved in healthcare decision-making for unbefriended residents. The most common decision was do-not-resuscitate orders. Decisions primarily were made by relying on the resident’s primary care physician and/or discussing within a facility interdisciplinary team. Key considerations in the decision-making process included “evidence that the resident would not have wanted further treatment” and the perception that “further treatment would not be in the resident’s best interest”. Compared with decision making for residents with surrogates, participants perceived decision making for unbefriended residents to be equally-more difficult. Key barriers to making decisions included uncertainty regarding what the resident would have wanted in the given situation and concerns regarding the ethically and legally right course of action. Facilitators (reported by 52 participants) included some information/knowledge about the resident, an understanding regarding decision-making-related law/policy, and facility-level support. The findings highlight the complexity and difficulty of healthcare decision making for unbefriended residents and suggest more discussions among all key stakeholders to develop practical strategies to support decision-making practices in NHs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document