Comparison of photobiomodulation and photodynamic therapy as adjuncts to mechanical debridement for the treatment of peri-implantitis

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Mansour H. Al-Askar ◽  
Fahad A. Abdullatif ◽  
Abdulmonem A. Alshihri ◽  
Asma Ahmed ◽  
Darshan Devang Divakar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Photodynamic Therapy ◽  
Null Hypothesis ◽  
Gingival Index ◽  
P Values ◽  
Inflammatory Parameters ◽  
Probing Depth ◽  
Crestal Bone Loss ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Soft Tissue Inflammation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) and photodynamic therapy (PDT) as adjuncts to mechanical debridement (MD) for the treatment of peri-implantitis. The present study is based on the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the peri-implant inflammatory parameters (modified plaque index [mPI], modified gingival index [mGI], probing depth [PD]) and crestal bone loss (CBL) following MD either with PBMT or PDT in patients with peri-implantitis. METHODS: Forty-nine patients with peri-implantitis were randomly categorized into three groups. In Groups 1 and 2, patients underwent MD with adjunct PBMT and PDT, respectively. In Group 3, patients underwent MD alone (controls). Peri-implant inflammatory parameters were measured at baseline and 3-months follow-up. P-values < 0.01 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: At baseline, peri-implant clinicoradiographic parameters were comparable in all groups. Compared with baseline, there was a significant reduction in mPI (P< 0.001), mGI (P< 0.001) and PD (P< 0.001) in Groups 1 and 2 at 3-months follow-up. In Group 3, there was no difference in the scores of mPI, mGI and PD at follow-up. At 3-months follow-up, there was no difference in mPI, mGI and PD among patients in Groups 1 and 2. The mPI (P< 0.001), mGI (P< 0.001) and PD (P< 0.001) were significantly higher in Group 3 than Groups 1 and 2. The CBL was comparable in all groups at follow-up. CONCLUSION: PBMT and PDT seem to be useful adjuncts to MD for the treatment of peri-implant soft-tissue inflammation among patients with peri-implantitis.

Role of probiotics for the treatment of peri-implant mucositis in patients with and without type-2 diabetes mellitus

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fawaz Alqahtani ◽  
Maha Alshaikh ◽  
Abid Mehmood ◽  
Nasser Alqhtani ◽  
Fahad Alkhtani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Treatment Procedure ◽  
Inflammatory Parameters ◽  
Probing Depth ◽  
Crestal Bone Loss ◽  
Group 2

The hypothesis was that probiotic therapy (PT) does not offer additional benefits to mechanical debridement (MD) for treatment of diabetic subjects with peri-implant mucositis (PM). This study compared the influence of PT as an adjunct to MD for the treatment of PM in type2 diabetic and non-diabetic patients over a 12-month follow-up period. Patients with and without type-2 diabetes were encompassed. Based upon treatment-procedure, PM patients were categorized into 2 groups: (a) Non-surgical + PT; and (b) Group-2: Non-surgical MD alone. Demographics and education statuses were recorded. Gingival (GI) and plaque (PI) indices, crestal bone loss (CBL) and probing depth (PD were measured at baseline and after 6- and 12-months. Significant differences were detected with P&lt;0.01. The HbA1c was significantly higher in diabetic patients at all time durations than patients without type-2 diabetes (P&lt;0.001). Baseline GI, PI, PD and CBL) were comparable in all groups. In patients with type-2-diabetes, there was no difference in PI, GI, PD and CBL at 6- and 12-months’ follow-up. In patients without type-2 diabetes, there was a significant reduction in PI (P&lt;0.01), GI (P&lt;0.01), and PD (P&lt;0.01) at 6-months and 1-year follow-up than their values at baseline. In patients without type-2 diabetes, MD with or without adjunct PT reduces soft tissue inflammatory parameters in patients with PM.

Efficacy of antibiotic versus probiotics as adjuncts to mechanical debridement for managing peri-implant mucositis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fawaz Alqahtani ◽  
Maha AlShaikh ◽  
Abid Mehmood ◽  
Nasser Alqhtani ◽  
Fahad Alkhtani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Antibiotic Therapy ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Probing Depth ◽  
Crestal Bone Loss ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Baseline Values ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

The objective was to compare the efficiency of probiotic (PT) versus antibiotic therapy (AT) as adjuvants to non-surgical-mechanical debridement (NSMD) in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis (Pi-M). Volunteers with Pi-M were encompassed. Therapeutically, patients were randomly divided into 3-groups: (a) Group-1: NSMD + PT; (b) Group-2: NSMD + AT; and (c) Group-3: NSMD alone. Peri-implant plaque index (P.I), bleeding on probing (B.O.P), probing depth (P.D) and crestal-bone-loss (C.B.L) were recorded at baseline and at 3-and 6-months follow-up. P&lt;0.05 was selected as the indicator of statistical significance. Forty-two male individuals (14, 14 and 14 in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively) were included. At 3- and 6-months of follow-up, P.I (P&lt;0.01), B.O.P (P&lt;0.01) and P.D (P&lt;0.01) were higher in Group-2 than Group-1. At 3-months of follow-up, P.I (P&lt;0.01), B.O.P (P&lt;0.01) and P.D (P&lt;0.01) were higher in Group-3 than Group-2. At 6-months of follow-up, P.I, B.O.P and P.D were comparable in groups 2 and 3. In Group-3, P.I, B.O.P and P.D were comparable with the respective baseline values at 6-months of follow-up. The C.B.L in all groups remained unchanged up to 6-months of follow-up. The NSMD with adjuvant PT is more effective than adjunct AT in the treatment of Pi-M for up to 3-months.

scholarly journals Effect of one and two sessions of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy on clinical and microbial outcomes of non-surgical management of chronic periodontitis: A clinical study

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-93
Author(s):  
Ardeshir Lafzi ◽  
Seyed Masoud Mojahedi ◽  
Mahdieh Mirakhori ◽  
Maryam Torshabi ◽  
Mahdi Kadkhodazadeh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Photodynamic Therapy ◽  
Chronic Periodontitis ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy ◽  
Group 4 ◽  
Probing Depth ◽  
Baseline Group ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Group 2

Background. Thisstudy aimed to compare the effect of one and two sessions of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) as an adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP) on clinical and microbial parameters in patients with chronic periodontitis. Methods. This study was conducted on 20 patients. The dental quadrants of patients were randomly assigned to SRP at baseline (group 1), SRP at baseline and one month (group 2), SRP plus aPDT at baseline (group 3) and SRP plus aPDT at baseline and one month (group 4). Probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL) gain, and bleeding on probing (BoP) were measured at baseline, and one and three months later. F. nucleatum counts were determined by PCR. ANOVA was used for the comparison of these variables between the groups. Results. In all the groups, PD reduction and CAL gain increased significantly at 1- and 3-month intervals compared to baseline (P=0.001). At three months, the difference in PD between groups 1 and 3 was statistically significant (P=0.014). CAL gain between groups 2 and 4 at one month (P=0.016) and three months (P=0.001) wasstatistically significant. Reduction in F. nucleatum counts was not significant between the four study groups (P>0.05). Conclusion. A combination of two sessions of aPDT and SRP could improve CAL gain; however, further long-term studies are necessary in this regard.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of the adjunctive use of ozone and chlorhexidine in patients with chronic periodontitis

BDJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaveri Kranti Gandhi ◽  
Emil G. Cappetta ◽  
Rajdeep Pavaskar
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Periodontitis ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Gingival Index ◽  
Periodontal Pathogens ◽  
Ozone Therapy ◽  
Clinical Attachment Loss ◽  
Probing Depth ◽  
Root Planning ◽  
Scaling And Root Planning

Abstract Background Scaling and root planning (SRP) is the gold standard approach for treatment of chronic periodontitis but used alone it may not be effective in removing periodontal pathogens from sites where access is poor. Objective To evaluate and compare the clinical and microbiological efficacy of ozone and chlorhexidine (CHX) as an adjunct to SRP in patients with chronic periodontitis. Methods Twenty-five patients with generalized moderate to severe chronic periodontitis with presence of at least one site in each quadrant with a probing depth ≥5 mm were recruited. In a split mouth study design, two quadrants were randomly allocated to the SRP and ozone therapy and the remaining two quadrants to SRP and CHX therapy. Plaque index (PI), Gingival index (GI), probing depth (PD), clinical attachment loss (CAL) were assessed. Subgingival plaque samples were obtained for assessment of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (Aa) and Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg). Results Both groups demonstrated significant intragroup reduction in PI, GI, PD, CAL, Pg count and Aa count from baseline to 3 months follow-up. There were no significant differences between two groups for any of the parameters. Conclusion Ozonated olive oil can be used as an adjunctive subgingival irrigant in patients with chronic periodontitis.

scholarly journals Clinical and Microbiological Outcomes of Topical Aloe Vera Gel vs. Photochemotherapy as an Adjunct to Non-surgical Periodontal Treatment in Periodontitis

2020 ◽  
Vol 07 (03) ◽  
pp. e100-e105
Author(s):  
Mohamed Farouk Elsadek ◽  
Badreldin Mohamed Ahmed ◽  
Rayan M. Eskandrani ◽  
Tasneem Sobhy Fahmy
Keyword(s):  
Photodynamic Therapy ◽  
Aloe Vera ◽  
Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy ◽  
Clinical Attachment Level ◽  
Probing Depth ◽  
Aloe Vera Gel ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Attachment Level ◽  
Group 1

AbstractThe present clinical trial aimed to assess the effectiveness of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy versus Aloe vera gel as an adjunct to scaling and root planing on periodontal and microbial outcomes in patients with periodontitis. Eligible patients undergoing nonsurgical periodontal treatment were divided into 3 groups: group 1: antimicrobial photodynamic therapy; group 2: Aloe vera gel application; and group 3: scaling and root planing only. Clinical periodontal variables included the assessment of plaque scores, bleeding on probing, probing depth, and clinical attachment level gain. Plaque samples were collected to estimate microbial counts of Tannerella forsythia (T. forsythia) and Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis). All measurements were recorded at baseline, 3 mo, and 6 mo. Statistical analysis of the given data was performed using the chi-squared test and ANOVA for clinical periodontal and microbiological data. Eighty-seven patients completed the trial. Bleeding on probing showed a significant reduction in group 2 compared with the other groups (p < 0.001). Group 1 showed a statistically significant reduction in probing depth and gain in clinical attachment level when compared to group 2 and group 3 (p < 0.05). Group 1 showed a statistically significant reduction in the counts of T. forsythia and P. gingivalis over a period of 3 mo (p < 0.05). The reduction was seen for T. forsythia only following 6 mo (p < 0.05). Group 2 showed a significant reduction for only T. forsythia at 3 mo (p < 0.05). Both antimicrobial photodynamic therapy and Aloe vera gel helped in reducing periodontal inflammation. Aloe vera gel showed additional benefit in reducing bleeding scores, while antimicrobial photodynamic therapy showed additional enhanced activity against periodontal pathogens and periodontal attachment level gain.

Adverse Effects of Implants in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rekhalakshmi Kamatham ◽  
Priyanka Avisa ◽  
Dileep Nag Vinnakota ◽  
Sivakumar Nuvvula
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Mini Implants ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Probing Depth ◽  
Crestal Bone Loss ◽  
Ebsco Host

Objective: To determine the evidence on the adverse effects of placing dental implants in healthy growing children. Study design: A systematic search was conducted in five electronic databases: PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane, EBSCO host, ProQuest. Studies on implants placed in children below the age of 19 years, with loss of tooth either due to trauma or caries were included, whereas, studies on mini implants and implants placed due to congenital absence of teeth were excluded. The articles that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were analyzed based on the predetermined criteria of success. Results: A total of 8 publications fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All the included articles were case reports/series, involving a total of 16 implants (15 maxillary, one mandibular) in 11 adolescents (7 boys and 4 girls). The age of implant placement ranged between ten to 17 years with a mean age of 13.4 years and the follow up period, 4.5 months to 13 years. Pain, paresthesia, mobility or peri-implant radiolucency was not reported in any case report, indicating good integration. Radiographic crestal bone loss, probing depth and implant esthetics were not mentioned. The infraocclusion was not reported in 5 cases (age: 11–17 years, follow up: 4.5 months-two years), however, it was an adverse effect in 6 cases (age: ten-17 years, follow up: three-13 years). Conclusion: There is insufficient evidence to contradict the placement of dental implants in healthy growing children; the only reported adverse event is infraocclusion, the management of which too is discussed. However, as all the data is from case reports, the result should be interpreted with caution. Therefore, well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to address this gap in the literature.

Clinical evaluation of excisional new attachment procedure versus laser assisted new attachment procedure in the treatment of periodontal pockets

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 118-123
Author(s):  
Priyanka Kumari ◽  
Manish Khatri ◽  
Mansi Bansal ◽  
Komal Puri
Keyword(s):  
Connective Tissue ◽  
Periodontal Pocket ◽  
Gingival Index ◽  
Gingival Bleeding ◽  
Group I ◽  
Probing Depth ◽  
Insignificant Difference ◽  
Vas Scores ◽  
Clinically Significant

TheLaser Assisted New Attachment Procedure (LANAP) protocol is a laser based periodontal regenerative procedure and was patterned, conceptually, after the Excisional New Attachment Procedure (ENAP) to separate the diseased epithelium from the underlying connective tissue and to selectively vaporize and disrupt inflamed and necrotic tissue from connective tissue.: The present study was designed to compare and evaluate the clinical efficacy of LANAP versus ENAP in the treatment of chronic periodontitis.: Twenty periodontal pocket sites of ≥5mm in systemically healthy patients were selected and randomly allocated to either (ENAP) Excisional New Attachment Procedure (Group I) or (LANAP) Laser Assisted New Attachment Procedure (Group II). Patients were evaluated for Plaque Index, Gingival Index, Gingival Bleeding Index, Probing Depth, Loss of attachment, recession and VAS scores. Patients were recalled for follow up at 1 week, 1 month and 3 months at which clinical parameters were recorded.: The results of the present study revealed statistically insignificant difference in both groups however clinically significant reduction in probing depth was seen with ENAP as compared to LANAP but laser procedure had less VAS scores as compared to ENAP.Although probing depth reduction was more for ENAP, patient discomfort with less bleeding was observed with LANAP.

scholarly journals Inpatient Evaluation of Periodontal, Esthetic and Inflammatory Parameters around Dental Implants and Natural Teeth

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Güliz N Güncü ◽  
Gülüzar Büyüktepe ◽  
Sezen B AÕkin ◽  
Kamer Klllnç ◽  
Celal Tümer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dental Implants ◽  
Gingival Crevicular Fluid ◽  
Gingival Index ◽  
Clinical Attachment Level ◽  
Inflammatory Parameters ◽  
Probing Depth ◽  
Natural Teeth ◽  
Fixed Prosthesis ◽  
Crevicular Fluid ◽  
Attachment Level

ABSTRACT Aim The use of endosseous dental implants (DI) has become a successful treatment alternative. However, providing periimplant tissue health and achieving a natural esthetic look are important topics in this treatment. The aim of the present study was to evaluate periodontal and esthetic parameters around DI and natural teeth (NT) and also to analyze myeloperoxidase (MPO) levels in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) and peri-implant sulcus fluid (PISF). Materials and methods Twenty DI supported fixed prosthesis and contralateral 20 NT were enrolled to the present study. Clinical periodontal parameters (probing depth, clinical attachment level, gingival bleeding time index and gingival index) were recorded and GCF/PISF samples were obtained from mesial (mesiobuccal and mesiolingual) and distal (distobuccal and distolingual) sites of DI and NT. MPO levels were spectrophotometrically determined. Additionally clinical photographs were obtained and esthetical evaluations were performed by using Jemt papilla index. The parameters belong to DI and NT were compared and correlations were evaluated using statistical analysis. Results A total of 40 samples were evaluated. No statistically significant differences were detected between groups in all periodontal parameters and MPO levels from mesial and distal sites. Jemt papilla index scores were slightly higher in NT however, this difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Total PES score were similiar in DI and NT groups. Significant correlations were detected between MPO and gingival index values as expected. Clinical significance Dental implants are satisfactory treatments, they provide patient esthetic natural looking, phonetic and masticatory functions. How to cite this article Güncü GN, Büyüktepe G, AÕkin SB, KlllnH K, Tümer C, Tözüm TF. Inpatient Evaluation of Periodontal Esthetic and Inflammatory Parameters around Dental Implants and Natural Teeth. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14(1):90-95.

Effectiveness of Brushing Associated with Oral Irrigation in Maintenance of Peri-Implant Tissues and Overdentures: Clinical Parameters and Patient Satisfaction.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcela Moreira Salles ◽  
Viviane de Cássia Oliveira ◽  
Ana Paula Macedo ◽  
Claudia Helena Silva-Lovato ◽  
Helena de Freitas Oliveira Paranhos
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Analogue Scale ◽  
Ring System ◽  
Complete Dentures ◽  
Gingival Index ◽  
Prosthetic Rehabilitation ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Probing Depth ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
High Level

Implant-supported prostheses hygiene and peri-implant tissues health are considered to be predictive factors for successful prosthetic rehabilitation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of brushing associated with oral irrigation measured as biofilm-removing capacity, maintenance of healthy oral tissues, and patient satisfaction. A randomized, crossover clinical trial was conducted with 38 patients who wore conventional maxillary complete dentures and mandibular overdentures retained by the O-ring system. The patients were instructed to use the following hygiene methods for 14 days: mechanical brushing [MB (brush and dentifrice - Control)]; and MB with oral irrigation [WP (Waterpik - Experimental)]. Biofilm-removing capacity and maintenance of healthy oral tissues were evaluated by the Modified Plaque Index (PI), Gingival Index (GI), Probing Depth (PD), and Bleeding on Probing Index (BP) recorded at baseline and after each method. In parallel, patients answered a specific questionnaire using a Visual Analogue Scale after each hygiene method. Data were analyzed by Friedman and Wilcoxon tests (α=0.05). The results showed significantly lower PI, GI, PD, and BP indices after application of the hygiene methods (P&lt;0.001) than those observed at baseline. However, no significant difference was found between MB and WP. The satisfaction questionnaire responses to both methods showed high mean values for all questions, with no statistically significant difference found between the answers given after the use of MB and WP (P&gt;0.05). The findings suggest that WP was effective in reducing PI, GI, PD, and BP indices and provided a high level of patient satisfaction.

Influence of moderate cigarette-smoking on the peri-implant clinicoradiographic inflammatory parameters around cement- and screw-retained dental implants

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mana Alqahtani
Keyword(s):  
Cigarette Smoking ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Inflammatory Parameters ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Implant Retention ◽  
Level Of Significance ◽  
Soft Tissue Inflammation ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
Adjustment Test

The aim was to assess the influence of moderate cigarette-smoking on the clinical (bleeding on probing [BoP] and probing depth [PD]) and radiographic (crestal bone resorption [CBR]) around cement- and screw-retained dental implants at 5 years’ follow-up. A questionnaire was used to collect information about age, gender, smoking history, duration of implants in function, jaw location of the implant, and daily toothbrushing and flossing. Peri-implant BoP, PD and CBR were measured in all groups. Group comparisons were performed using one-way analysis of variance and for multiple comparisons, the Bonferroni Post hoc adjustment test was performed. Level of significance was set at P&lt;0.05. Forty-eight patients (25 smokers and 23 non-smokers) had cement-retained dental implants; and 48 (24 smokers and 24 non-smokers) had screw-retained dental implants. Among patients with cement and screw-retained dental implants, PD (P&lt;0.05) and CBR (P&lt;0.05) were significantly higher among smokers than non-smokers. The peri-implant sites that demonstrated BoP were statistically significantly higher among non-smokers (P&lt;0.05) than smokers among patients with cement- and screw-retained dental implants. There was no statistically significant difference in peri-implant PD and CBR among smokers with cement- and screw-retained dental implants. Among non-smokers with cement and screw-retained dental implants, there was no statistically significant difference in BoP, PD and CBR. Cigarette-smoking is associated with an increased PD and CBR around cement- and screw-retained dental implants. Cigarette-smoking increases peri-implant soft tissue inflammation as well as loss of crestal bone and this relationship is independent of the type of implant retention protocol used.The author recommends that cement- and screw-retained dental implants are suitable for prosthesis restoration in non-smokers. Further studies on dual-smokers (individuals smoking cigarettes and other forms of tobacco products) are needed related to the clinicoradiographic inflammatory parameters around cement- and screw-retained dental implants

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document