Anterior pelvic plane registration accuracy and cup position measurement using ultrasound- and pointer-based navigation in primary total hip arthroplasty

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 315-323
Author(s):  
Hartmuth Kiefer ◽  
Jannis Löchel ◽  
Keosun Sambo ◽  
Björn Leder ◽  
Georgi I. Wassilew
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Anterior Pelvic Plane ◽  
Position Measurement ◽  
Registration Accuracy ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Cup Position ◽  
Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Severe Dysplastic Hip Osteoarthritis With a Far Proximal Cup Position

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 920-925 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus T. Berninger ◽  
Sven Hungerer ◽  
Jan Friederichs ◽  
Fabian M. Stuby ◽  
Christian Fulghum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Osteoarthritis ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Dysplastic Hip ◽  
Cup Position ◽  
Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

scholarly journals Acetabular cup position and risk of dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty

2016 ◽  
Vol 88 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kurt G Seagrave ◽  
Anders Troelsen ◽  
Henrik Malchau ◽  
Henrik Husted ◽  
Kirill Gromov
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Acetabular Cup ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Cup Position ◽  
Acetabular Cup Position ◽  
Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Posterior distal cement extrusion during primary total hip arthroplasty: A cause for concern?

1999 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 832-839 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan L. Knight ◽  
Timothy Coglon ◽  
Chad Hagen ◽  
John Clark
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

scholarly journals Comparison of short-term outcomes of anterolateral supine approach and posterolateral approach for primary total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Taku Ukai ◽  
Goro Ebihara ◽  
Masahiko Watanabe
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Posterolateral Approach ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Hip Flexion ◽  
Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Abstract Background This study aims to evaluate postoperative pain and functional and clinical outcomes of anterolateral supine (ALS) and posterolateral (PL) approaches for primary total hip arthroplasty. Materials and methods We retrospectively examined the joints of 110 patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). The ALS group was compared with the PL group using the pain visual analog scale (VAS) and narcotic consumption as pain outcomes. Functional outcomes included postoperative range of motion (ROM) of hip flexion, day on which patients could perform straight leg raising (SLR), day on which patients began using a walker or cane, duration of hospital stay, rate of transfer, and strength of hip muscles. Clinical outcomes included pre and postoperative Harris Hip Scores. Results No significant differences were found in the pain VAS scores or narcotic consumption between the two groups. The PL group could perform SLR earlier than the ALS group (P < 0.01). The ALS group started using a cane earlier (P < 0.01) and had a shorter hospital stay (P < 0.01) than the PL group. Degrees of active ROM of flexion at postoperative day (POD) 1 were significantly lower in the ALS group than in the PL group (P < 0.01). Regarding hip muscle strength, hip flexion was significantly weaker in the ALS group than in the PL group until 1-month POD (P < 0.01). External rotation from 2 weeks to 6 months postoperatively was significantly weaker in the PL group than in the ALS group (P < 0.01). Conclusion The ALS approach was more beneficial than the PL approach because ALS enabled better functional recovery of the strength of external rotation, improved rehabilitation, and involved a shorter hospital stay. Level of Evidence Level IV retrospective observational study.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document