A Model for Evidence-Based Social Policy Making, Driven by Big Data, Dynamic Simulation and Stakeholders Participation

Author(s):  
Aggeliki Androutsopoulou ◽  
Yannis Charalabidis

European Union and governments of the member states are striving to respond to contemporary socio-economic challenges with social investments and enhanced social support, often relying on social innovation in their quest to welfare reforms. However, social policy innovations targeting to improve social welfare, often neglect objective data describing societal phenomena and European citizens’ perspectives and patterns of human behaviour, resulting of their real status of wellbeing. Systematic methods for measuring the impact of innovative social policy reforms and transformations in the provision of social services is an important research challenge in the European welfare system. In this chapter, a comprehensive model of evidence-based social policy making is proposed, driven by dynamic simulation methodologies and data mining techniques to extract evidence from two types of data. On the one hand, objective data coming from a multiplicity of sources, including governmental data and statistical data, are used to capture the interlinked policy domains and their underlying casual mechanisms. On the other hand, it considers behavioural aspects and citizens’ opinions as data analytics emerging from Web 2.0 sources, social media posts, polls and statistical surveys. To combine this multimodal information, our approach suggests a modelling methodology that bases on big data acquisition and processing for the identification of significant factors and counterintuitive interrelations between them, which can be applied in any policy domain. Then, the suggested methodology is applied within the context of a social policy innovation initiative aiming to counter adversities of the migration challenge. The presented model provides a first proof a concept on how ICT and specifically data intelligence can drive social policy reforms. However, further application and validation of the approach for driving policy design and implementation in the future in any domain, is suggested.

2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 459-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lesley Murray

Despite promotion of evidence-based policy responses, there remains a knowledge gap between policy-makers and academia particularly in transport policy making, which is steeped in positivist traditions. A number of social policy academics have conceptualised research utilisation in relation to particular elements of social policy, but less attention has been paid to the integration of deliberative and interpretative research into transport policy. This article explores this through a study of the journey to school that used mobile and visual methods in an in-depth exploration of this element of everyday life.


2019 ◽  
pp. 180-194
Author(s):  
Ralph Schroeder

Business and industry, governments, and academia are increasingly using “big data,” such as data derived from social media that is unprecedented in its scale and scope in yielding insights into people’s attitudes or behavior. Increasingly, big data has been promoted as a new tool for evidence-based decisions and policy-making. In this chapter, Ralph Schroeder outlines contrasting theoretical perspectives on big data. He compares Marxists, who demonstrate the ways that big data can be deployed to exploit users of digital media, and free-market thinkers (following Hayek), who believe that in an age of more data, capitalism will continue to lead to more growth. He then contrasts those perspectives with those of the sociologist Max Weber. By contrasting these theoretical perspectives, the author argues that there is a middle ground between Marx and Hayek. From a Weberian point of view, big data need neither be endorsed as an unquestionably positive development, nor necessarily critiqued as inherently exploitative.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Olminski ◽  
M Koziol ◽  
K Bartolik

Abstract As the economies transform into data-centered, so does the healthcare system. Responding effectively to the current problems by making right decisions and setting up the adjusted policies, either on national or regional level, requires the evidence-based tool. The one developed in Poland is called 'Maps of Health Needs', which states an unbiased source of information to a broad spectrum of stakeholders. The project is the answer to the need of evidence based policy making. The process is based on four steps: firstly, the data on demographics, epidemiology, staff, provided services, infrastructure, etc., are gathered,after that, they are analyzed, using the combination of two fields of expertise: advanced programming and statistics with medical knowledge; the qualitative and quantitative indicators are settled, along with its forecast,subsequently, the conclusions for the system are drawn,finally, the recommendations on actions are set up. First maps were published on 2015. The project is a subject to the constant adjustments, as the maps are upgraded and updated yearly, according to the stakeholders' expectations. Lately the maps for the five most burdening problems have been published in a form of an online app, accompanied by an executive summary. The spectrum of use of the maps is broad, not only for health priorities and health policy. Project's results are also used to review the legitimacy of financing health investments from public funds. Moreover, the planning and monitoring of the system is enhanced. Recent examples include also geographical distribution of linear accelerators and locations for psychiatric centers. Key messages Data is nowadays a key factor in decision making, also in the health system. The tool developed in Poland, called Maps of Health Needs, resulted in some real changes and might be set as an example or inspiration for others.


2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 265-271
Author(s):  
Claudia Lintner

This article analyses the relationship between migrant entrepreneurship, marginalisation and social innovation. It does so, by looking how their ‘otherness’ is used on the one hand to reproduce their marginalised situation in society and on the other to develop new living and working arrangements promoting social innovation in society. The paper is based on a qualitative study, which was carried out from March 2014- 2016. In this period, twenty semi-structured interviews were conducted with migrant entrepreneurs and experts. As the results show, migrant entrepreneurs are characterised by a false dichotomy of “native weakness” in economic self-organisation against the “classical strength” of majority entrepreneurs. It is shown that new possibilities of acting in the context of migrant entrepreneurship are mostly organised in close relation to the lifeworlds and specific needs deriving from this sphere. Social innovation processes initiated by migrant entrepreneurs through their economic activities thus develop on a micro level and are hence less apparent. Supportive networks are missing on a structural level, so it becomes difficult for single innovative initiatives to be long-lasting.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document