Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire Spina Bifida (TRAQ-SB) specific module and its association with clinical outcomes among youth and young adults with spina bifida

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 405-413
Author(s):  
David Wood ◽  
Brandon Rocque ◽  
Betsy Hopson ◽  
Katherine Barnes ◽  
Kiana R. Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
Spina Bifida ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Readiness Assessment ◽  
Transition Readiness ◽  
Youth And Young Adults ◽  
Assessment Questionnaire

scholarly journals Measuring Transition Readiness in Adolescents and Young Adults with Sickle Cell Disease Using the Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anjali Oberoi ◽  
Alyssa Patterson ◽  
Amy Sobota
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
Sickle Cell Disease ◽  
Sickle Cell ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Adolescents And Young Adults ◽  
Cell Disease ◽  
Readiness Assessment ◽  
Transition Readiness ◽  
Assessment Questionnaire

Background/Objectives: Adolescents and young adults (AYA) with sickle cell disease (SCD) face challenges related to the disease and its treatment. The Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire (TRAQ) is a self-report tool for assessing transition readiness for youth with special health care needs (YSHCN), including SCD. This study uses the TRAQ to understand transition readiness in patients with SCD treated at the Boston Medical Center, evaluates associations between TRAQ scores and transition outcomes (e.g., EDr, EDu), and compares TRAQ scores in this population with other YSHCN. Methods: We reviewed electronic medical records of AYA with SCD who completed the TRAQ in the pediatric hematology clinic between January 1, 2019, and March 1, 2020, and categorized healthcare encounters to calculate EDu and EDr. We used t-tests and ANOVA models to analyze mean TRAQ scores, sex, age, genotype, EDu, and EDr. Results: The sample was 45 AYA patients with SCD between 13 and 22 years old. The mean TRAQ score for the overall patient sample was 3.67. Mean TRAQ scores did not significantly vary by sex or genotype but did significantly increase with age. TRAQ scores were lower in the SCD population than in other YSHCN. TRAQ scores did not correlate to EDu or EDr. Conclusions: AYA patients with SCD have lower transition readiness than other populations of YSHCN. The age of 18 may not be the most reliable attribute of readiness, though older patients do have higher readiness. The relationship between TRAQ scores, EDr, and EDu is not clear and requires further evaluation.

Measuring Transition Readiness of Young Adults with Sickle Cell Disease Using the Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3534-3534
Author(s):  
Lauren Brown ◽  
Amy Sobota
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
Medication Management ◽  
Health Issues ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Adult Care ◽  
Readiness Assessment ◽  
Special Health Care ◽  
Transition Readiness ◽  
Appointment Keeping ◽  
Assessment Questionnaire

Abstract Background The transition from pediatric to adult care can be a difficult time for young adults with sickle cell disease (SCD) who experience increased rates of acute care utilization and worse health outcomes. An important aspect of transition preparation includes an assessment of transition readiness. Data show that adolescents with SCD have suboptimal transition readiness, however most studies use disease specific measures which do not allow for comparisons between patient populations. The Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire (TRAQ) is a validated tool for youth with a variety of medical diagnoses. We have been collecting TRAQ data on our patients for the past 6 months as part of an ongoing quality improvement initiative. The purpose of this study is to analyze transition readiness scores among patients with SCD in our program, and to compare their scores with other populations of youth with special health care needs. Methods We administered the TRAQ to patients with SCD ages 13 to 22 seen in general pediatric hematology clinic or our specialized transition clinic from December 2015 to June 2016. The TRAQ contains 20 questions which measure transition readiness in five domains: managing medication, appointment keeping, tracking health issues, talking with providers, and managing daily activities. Each question is answered on a 5-point scale based on the transtheoretical model from 1 = "No, I do not know how to do this" to 5 = " Yes, I always do this when I need to". Mean TRAQ scores were analyzed by age and compared to reported TRAQ scores among other diagnostic groups in the literature. Results Fifty patients completed the TRAQ during the study period. One patient was ineligible due to cognitive delay. This represents 58% of eligible patients in our practice. Respondents were 50% female with a mean age of 17 years 9 months. The majority (70%) have HbSS. The mean overall TRAQ score was 3.5 (SD 0.72) with the highest scores in the domains of communication with providers and managing daily activities. As has previously been reported mean TRAQ scores were higher among young adults compared with older and younger adolescents. (Table 1) Our patients reported high readiness in certain aspects of medication management, with 69% of respondents stating that they always take medications correctly. However, respondents were less likely to favorably report filling needed prescriptions or reordering medications when they run out (only 22% and 27% of respondents respectively reported always completing these tasks). Questions related to insurance coverage had low scores overall; 65% of patients responded that they do not know how to apply for insurance if they lose their coverage, and 47% do not know what their insurance covers. Compared to reported TRAQ scores among patients with chronic health conditions other than SCD, our patients had lower scores in the domains of managing medications (3.63 vs 3.93), appointment keeping (2.98 vs 3.41) and tracking health issues (3.03 vs 3.33) Conclusions: By using a non-disease specific transition readiness tool we were able to analyze transition readiness in our clinic population of adolescents and young adults with SCD and compare our findings with the literature on youth with special health care needs. While it is encouraging that TRAQ scores were higher among older patients, mean scores still show room for improvement even among 18-22 year olds. Lower scores in medication management and appointment keeping in our population are particularly concerning as these aspects of chronic disease self-management are key to a successful transition to adult care. Additional work is needed to determine how transition readiness changes with time, and how we can help improve self-management and self-advocacy skills among our patients with SCD. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

The Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire (TRAQ): Its Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 415-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L. Wood ◽  
Gregory S. Sawicki ◽  
M. David Miller ◽  
Carmen Smotherman ◽  
Katryne Lukens-Bull ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Structure ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Readiness Assessment ◽  
Transition Readiness ◽  
Structure Reliability ◽  
Assessment Questionnaire

TRAQ changes: Improving the measurement of transition readiness by the Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire

2021 ◽  
Vol 59 ◽  
pp. 188-195
Author(s):  
Kiana Johnson ◽  
Matthew McBee ◽  
John Reiss ◽  
William Livingood ◽  
David Wood
Keyword(s):  
Readiness Assessment ◽  
Transition Readiness ◽  
Assessment Questionnaire

scholarly journals Measuring the Transition Readiness of Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes Using the Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 347-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacqueline T. Chan ◽  
Jinal Soni ◽  
Deepank Sahni ◽  
Stelios Mantis ◽  
Claudia Boucher-Berry
Keyword(s):  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Readiness Assessment ◽  
Transition Readiness ◽  
Assessment Questionnaire

scholarly journals Validation of EpiTRAQ, a transition readiness assessment tool for adolescents and young adults with epilepsy

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 487-495
Author(s):  
Sarah J. Clark ◽  
Nicholas J. Beimer ◽  
Acham Gebremariam ◽  
Linda L. Fletcher ◽  
Anup D. Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Adolescents And Young Adults ◽  
Readiness Assessment ◽  
Transition Readiness
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document