The effectiveness of psychological interventions for aggressive behavior following acquired brain injury: A meta-analysis and systematic review

2016 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Byrne ◽  
Rudi Coetzer
2013 ◽  
Vol 94 (7) ◽  
pp. 1386-1397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franziska Stalder-Lüthy ◽  
Nadine Messerli-Bürgy ◽  
Helene Hofer ◽  
Eveline Frischknecht ◽  
Hansjörg Znoj ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajath Sasidharan Pillai ◽  
Kiran Iyer ◽  
Rubens Spin-Neto ◽  
Simple Futarmal Kothari ◽  
Jørgen Feldbæk Nielsen ◽  
...  

Background: To systematically review the current literature investigating the association between oral health and acquired brain injury. Methods: A structured search strategy was applied to PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL electronic databases until March 2017 by 2 independent reviewers. The preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis guidelines were used for systematic review. Results: Even though the objective was to assess the association between oral health and acquired brain injury, eligible studies focused solely on different forms of stroke and stroke subtypes. Stroke prediction was associated with various factors such as number of teeth, periodontal conditions (even after controlling for confounding factors), clinical attachment loss, antibody levels to Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans and Prevotella intermedia. The literature showed no consensus on the possible association between gingivitis and stroke. Patients with stroke generally had poorer oral hygiene practices and oral health. Dental prophylaxis and professional intervention reduced the incidence of stroke. Conclusions: Overall, oral health and stroke were related. Periodontitis and tooth loss were independently associated with stroke. However, prevention and timely intervention may reduce the risk of stroke. Stroke was the main cerebral lesion studied in the literature, with almost no publications on other brain lesions.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Phillips ◽  
Elayne Ahern ◽  
David Mockler ◽  
Grainne McGettrick ◽  
Kyle Fitzpatrick ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) refers to any type of brain damage after birth. ABI from either traumatic or non-traumatic origin is a leading cause of death and long-term disability globally. The impact of an ABI can be cognitive and/ or physical greatly affecting their ability to function independently. With a lack of specialist inpatient rehabilitation facilities and services many of these survivors reside within the community either alone, with family or in residential facilities. Up-to-date evidence is required to indicate which forms of community rehabilitation are most effective in improving cognitive and physical outcomes for survivors. This systematic review aims to explore the clinical effectiveness of community neurorehabilitation services for persons living with an ABI. Methods A systematic review of relevant electronic databases will be undertaken to identify eligible published randomised controlled trials. The PRISMA statement will be used to guide the systematic review. From running the initial search, we aim to submit the paper for publishing within 6 months. This process will be completed using Covidence software. Two reviewers will independently screen the search results and select studies using pre-defined selection criteria, extract data from and assess risk of bias for selected studies. Discussion This systematic review will aim to explore the clinical effectiveness of community neuro-rehabilitation services for persons with an ABI. It plans to review and synthesize the current best available evidence base. A goal of this study is to positively inform ongoing service development within a quality framework. Systematic review registration CRD: CRD42020148604


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document