Multiperiod portfolio selection models under uncertain measure and with multiple criteria

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Jia Zhai ◽  
Haitao Zheng ◽  
Manying Bai ◽  
Yunyun Jiang

This paper explores a multiperiod portfolio optimization problem under uncertain measure involving background risk, liquidity constraints and V-shaped transaction costs. Unlike traditional studies, we establish multiperiod mean-variance portfolio optimization models with multiple criteria in which security returns, background asset returns and turnover rates are assumed to be uncertain variables that can be estimated by experienced experts. When the returns of the securities and background assets follow normal uncertainty distributions, we use the deterministic forms of the multiperiod portfolio optimization model. The uncertain multiperiod portfolio selection models are practical but complicated. Therefore, the models are solved by employing a genetic algorithm. The uncertain multiperiod model with multiple criteria is compared with an uncertain multiperiod model without background risk and an uncertain multiperiod model without liquidity constraint, we discuss how background risk and liquidity affect optimal terminal wealth. Finally, we give two numerical examples to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach and models.

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Stephanie S. W. Su ◽  
Sie Long Kek

In this paper, the current variant technique of the stochastic gradient descent (SGD) approach, namely, the adaptive moment estimation (Adam) approach, is improved by adding the standard error in the updating rule. The aim is to fasten the convergence rate of the Adam algorithm. This improvement is termed as Adam with standard error (AdamSE) algorithm. On the other hand, the mean-variance portfolio optimization model is formulated from the historical data of the rate of return of the S&P 500 stock, 10-year Treasury bond, and money market. The application of SGD, Adam, adaptive moment estimation with maximum (AdaMax), Nesterov-accelerated adaptive moment estimation (Nadam), AMSGrad, and AdamSE algorithms to solve the mean-variance portfolio optimization problem is further investigated. During the calculation procedure, the iterative solution converges to the optimal portfolio solution. It is noticed that the AdamSE algorithm has the smallest iteration number. The results show that the rate of convergence of the Adam algorithm is significantly enhanced by using the AdamSE algorithm. In conclusion, the efficiency of the improved Adam algorithm using the standard error has been expressed. Furthermore, the applicability of SGD, Adam, AdaMax, Nadam, AMSGrad, and AdamSE algorithms in solving the mean-variance portfolio optimization problem is validated.


2004 ◽  
Vol 21 (03) ◽  
pp. 297-317 ◽  
Author(s):  
LEONID CHURILOV ◽  
IMMANUEL M. BOMZE ◽  
MOSHE SNIEDOVICH ◽  
DANIEL RALPH

Hyper Sensitivity Analysis (HSA) is an intuitive generalization of conventional sensitivity analysis, where the term "hyper" indicates that the sensitivity analysis is conducted with respect to functions rather than numeric values. In this paper Composite Concave Programming is used to perform HSA in the area of Portfolio Optimization Problems. The concept of HSA is suited for situations where several candidates for the function quantifying the utility of (mean, variance) pairs are available. We discuss the applications of HSA to two types of mean–variance portfolio optimization problems: the classical one and a discrete knapsack-type portfolio selection problem. It is explained why in both cases the methodology can be applied to full size problems.


2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (05) ◽  
pp. 2150029
Author(s):  
PIETER M. VAN STADEN ◽  
DUY-MINH DANG ◽  
PETER A. FORSYTH

We consider the practical investment consequences of implementing the two most popular formulations of the scalarization (or risk-aversion) parameter in the time-consistent dynamic mean–variance (MV) portfolio optimization problem. Specifically, we compare results using a scalarization parameter assumed to be (i) constant and (ii) inversely proportional to the investor’s wealth. Since the link between the scalarization parameter formulation and risk preferences is known to be nontrivial (even in the case where a constant scalarization parameter is used), the comparison is viewed from the perspective of an investor who is otherwise agnostic regarding the philosophical motivations underlying the different formulations and their relation to theoretical risk-aversion considerations, and instead simply wishes to compare investment outcomes of the different strategies. In order to consider the investment problem in a realistic setting, we extend some known results to allow for the case where the risky asset follows a jump-diffusion process, and examine multiple sets of plausible investment constraints that are applied simultaneously. We show that the investment strategies obtained using a scalarization parameter that is inversely proportional to wealth, which enjoys widespread popularity in the literature applying MV optimization in institutional settings, can exhibit some undesirable and impractical characteristics.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia Zhai ◽  
Manying Bai

This paper discusses an uncertain portfolio selection problem with consideration of background risk and asset liquidity. In addition, the transaction costs are also considered. The security returns, background asset return, and asset liquidity are estimated by experienced experts instead of historical data. Regarding them as uncertain variables, a mean-risk model with background risk, liquidity, and transaction costs is proposed for portfolio selection and the crisp forms of the model are provided when security returns obey different uncertainty distributions. Moreover, for better understanding of the impact of background risk and liquidity on portfolio selection, some important theorems are proved. Finally, numerical experiments are presented to illustrate the modeling idea.


Author(s):  
Ranran Zhang ◽  
Bo Li

This paper deals with a portfolio selection problem with uncertain returns. Here, the returns of the assets are regarded as uncertain variables which are estimated by experienced experts. First, an uncertain mean-variance-entropy model for portfolio selection problem is presented by taking into account four criteria viz., return, risk, liquidity and diversification degree of portfolio. In the proposed model, the investment return is quantified by uncertain expected value, the investment risk is characterized by uncertain variance and entropy is used to measure the diversification degree of portfolio. Moreover, different from the previous bi-objective optimization model, our model achieves both the maximum return and the minimum risk in a single objective form by introducing a risk aversion factor and the dimensional influence caused by different units is eliminated by normalization. Then, two auxiliary portfolio selection models are transformed into different equivalent deterministic models. Finally, a numerical simulation is given to verify the practicability of our model.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document