Practical RFID ownership transfer scheme

2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 319-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ching Yu Ng ◽  
Willy Susilo ◽  
Yi Mu ◽  
Rei Safavi-Naini
Keyword(s):  
Transfer Scheme ◽  
Ownership Transfer

Policy Lapses and Gaps on the Formulation of Energy Laws of the Philippines: The Case of Iligan Diesel Power Plants

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ariel P. Anghay
Keyword(s):  
Local Government ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
The Philippines ◽  
Transfer Scheme ◽  
Ownership Transfer ◽  
Documentary Analysis ◽  
Philippine Government ◽  
Filipino People ◽  
Bot Project

Abstract - Independent Power Producers are energy suppliers contracted by the Philippine government to avert the power crisis in the 1990’s. The study analyzed the policy lapses and gaps on the energy laws as a framework in the analysis of the Iligan Diesel Power Plants. The study used the descriptive design involving documentary analysis of existing energy laws and IPP contracts supported by triangulation of records with interviews and onsite inspection. The results of the study showed that the Buil-Operate-Transfer scheme lacks clear provision of ownership transfer. The Iligan local government had difficulty disposing of the BOT project due to land project issue. The LGU lacks the logistics and manpower capability to maintain a confiscated property that is incurring heavy loss. The study concludes that the energy laws had serious lapses and gaps traceable to the formulation and implementation of BOT and IPP in the 1990’s. The provisions of the BOT program insured the profitability and sustainability of the IPP contractors at the expense of the welfare of the Filipino people. Viewed on a long term perspective, the BOT program spawned problems than solutions to the power crisis. The issues triggered the problems hounding the Iligan Diesel Power Plants today. Keywords - Independent Power Producers, Build-Operate-Transfer, EPIRA Law

What Happened to the Company That Dix Made?

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 588-633
Author(s):  
Nikki Mandell
Keyword(s):  
Twentieth Century ◽  
Capitalist Society ◽  
Industrial Democracy ◽  
Welfare Programs ◽  
Transfer Scheme ◽  
Ownership Transfer ◽  
Early Twentieth Century ◽  
Corporate Welfare ◽  
The One

In the early twentieth century, progressive employers tried to turn recalcitrant workers into cooperative partners with a menu of corporate welfare programs. One of those employers, Henry A. Dix, took a leap that few contemplated. In 1922 he announced a plan to give his profitable $1 million business to his employees. Dix became famous as “the man who gave his business to his employees.” His ownership transfer scheme sought to make the welfare of the workforce the raison d'etre of a modern shareholder-owned corporation. It raised the possibility of building a capitalist society quite different from the one that emerged in the twentieth century. This paper connects the Dix plan to an understudied employer-based movement for industrial democracy and examines cultural, gender, and class dimensions of the Dix transfer from conception through the company's demise decades later.

Cryptanalaysis of an EPCC1G2 Standard Compliant Ownership Transfer Scheme

2013 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 245-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Munilla ◽  
Fuchun Guo ◽  
Willy Susilo
Keyword(s):  
Transfer Scheme ◽  
Ownership Transfer

An Ownership Transfer Scheme Using Mobile RFIDs

2012 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 1093-1119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chin-Ling Chen ◽  
Chih-Feng Chien
Keyword(s):  
Transfer Scheme ◽  
Ownership Transfer

scholarly journals A Privacy Model for RFID Tag Ownership Transfer

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xingchun Yang ◽  
Chunxiang Xu ◽  
Chaorong Li
Keyword(s):  
The Other ◽  
Security Requirements ◽  
Transfer Scheme ◽  
Rfid Tag ◽  
Transfer Processes ◽  
Ownership Transfer ◽  
Proposed Model ◽  
Formal Definitions ◽  
Privacy Model ◽  
Privacy Problem

The ownership of RFID tag is often transferred from one owner to another in its life cycle. To address the privacy problem caused by tag ownership transfer, we propose a tag privacy model which captures the adversary’s abilities to get secret information inside readers, to corrupt tags, to authenticate tags, and to observe tag ownership transfer processes. This model gives formal definitions for tag forward privacy and backward privacy and can be used to measure the privacy property of tag ownership transfer scheme. We also present a tag ownership transfer scheme, which is privacy-preserving under the proposed model and satisfies the other common security requirements, in addition to achieving better performance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document