Investigating Causal Relations Between Risk Tolerance, Risky Behaviors, and Alzheimer’s Disease: A Bidirectional Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 78 (4) ◽  
pp. 1679-1687
Author(s):  
Yu-Xiang Yang ◽  
Kevin Kuo ◽  
Hong-Qi Li ◽  
Xue-Ning Shen ◽  
Shi-Dong Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Risk Taking ◽  
Risky Behavior ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Causal Effect ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Risky Behaviors ◽  
Risk Tolerance ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies

Background: Several studies have shown risky behaviors and risk tolerance are associated with Alzheimer’s disease. However, the underlying causality remains unclear. Risky behavior and risk tolerance may induce the onset of Alzheimer’s disease, and/or vulnerability to Alzheimer’s disease may result in more risky behaviors. Objective: To examine bidirectional relationships between risky behavior, risk tolerance, and Alzheimer’s disease using Mendelian randomization method for assessing potential causal inference. Methods: This bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study used independent genetic variants associated with risky behaviors and risk tolerance (n = 370, 771– 939, 908), and Alzheimer’s disease (n = 71, 880 – 37, 613) as genetic instruments from large meta-analyses of genome-wide association studies. Results: Our results support a strong protective casual effect of risk-taking tendency on AD (odds ratio [OR] = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.67– 0.94, p = 0.007). There was weak statistically significant relationship between number of sexual partners and AD (OR = 0.50, 95% CI, 0.27– 0.93, p = 0.04), and between family history of AD and automobile speeding propensity (OR = 1.018, 95% CI, 1.005 to 1.031; p = 0.007). Contrary to expectations, there was no statistically significant causal effect of AD on risk-taking tendency (β=  0.015, 95% CI, – 0.005 to 0.04; p = 0.14). Conclusion: Under Mendelian randomization assumptions, our results suggest a protective relationship between risk-taking tendency and the risk of AD. This finding may provide valuable insights into Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis and the development of preventive strategies.

scholarly journals Is disrupted sleep a risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease? Evidence from a two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma L Anderson ◽  
Rebecca C Richmond ◽  
Samuel E Jones ◽  
Gibran Hemani ◽  
Kaitlin H Wade ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Daytime Sleepiness ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Causal Effect ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Tentative Evidence

Abstract Background It is established that Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients experience sleep disruption. However, it remains unknown whether disruption in the quantity, quality or timing of sleep is a risk factor for the onset of AD. Methods We used the largest published genome-wide association studies of self-reported and accelerometer-measured sleep traits (chronotype, duration, fragmentation, insomnia, daytime napping and daytime sleepiness), and AD. Mendelian randomization (MR) was used to estimate the causal effect of self-reported and accelerometer-measured sleep parameters on AD risk. Results Overall, there was little evidence to support a causal effect of sleep traits on AD risk. There was some suggestive evidence that self-reported daytime napping was associated with lower AD risk [odds ratio (OR): 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.50–0.99). Some other sleep traits (accelerometer-measured ‘eveningness’ and sleep duration, and self-reported daytime sleepiness) had ORs of a similar magnitude to daytime napping, but were less precisely estimated. Conclusions Overall, we found very limited evidence to support a causal effect of sleep traits on AD risk. Our findings provide tentative evidence that daytime napping may reduce AD risk. Given that this is the first MR study of multiple self-report and objective sleep traits on AD risk, findings should be replicated using independent samples when such data become available.

Life Course Adiposity and Alzheimer’s Disease: A Mendelian Randomization Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Xian Li ◽  
Yan Tian ◽  
Yu-Xiang Yang ◽  
Ya-Hui Ma ◽  
Xue-Ning Shen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Life Course ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Fat Percentage ◽  
Regression Methods ◽  
Weighted Median

Background: Several studies showed that life course adiposity was associated with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, the underlying causality remains unclear. Objective: We aimed to examine the causal relationship between life course adiposity and AD using Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. Methods: Instrumental variants were obtained from large genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for life course adiposity, including birth weight (BW), childhood body mass index (BMI), adult BMI, waist circumference (WC), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and body fat percentage (BFP). A meta-analysis of GWAS for AD including 71,880 cases and 383,378 controls was used in this study. MR analyses were performed using inverse variance weighted (IVW), weighted median, and MR-Egger regression methods. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) per genetically predicted standard deviation (1-SD) unit increase in each trait for AD. Results: Genetically predicted 1-SD increase in adult BMI was significantly associated with higher risk of AD (IVW: OR = 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01–1.05, p = 2.7×10–3) after Bonferroni correction. The weighted median method indicated a significant association between BW and AD (OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.90–0.98, p = 1.8×10–3). We also found suggestive associations of AD with WC (IVW: OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 1.00–1.07, p = 0.048) and WHR (weighted median: OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.00–1.07, p = 0.029). No association was detected of AD with childhood BMI and BFP. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that lower BW and higher adult BMI had causal effects on increased AD risk.

scholarly journals Growth Differentiation Factor 15 Is Associated With Alzheimer’s Disease Risk

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng-Fei Wu ◽  
Xing-Hao Zhang ◽  
Ping Zhou ◽  
Rui Yin ◽  
Xiao-Ting Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
European Ancestry ◽  
Reverse Direction ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Growth Differentiation Factor 15 ◽  
Differentiation Factor

BackgroundPrevious observational studies have suggested that associations exist between growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15) and neurodegenerative diseases. We aimed to investigate the causal relationships between GDF-15 and Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).MethodsUsing summary-level datasets from genome-wide association studies of European ancestry, we performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study. Genetic variants significantly associated (p < 5 × 10–8) with GDF-15 were selected as instrumental variables (n = 5). An inverse-variance weighted method was implemented as the primary MR approach, while weighted median, MR–Egger, leave-one-out analysis, and Cochran’s Q-test were conducted as sensitivity analyses. All analyses were performed using R 3.6.1 with relevant packages.ResultsMR provided evidence for the association of elevated GDF-15 levels with a higher risk of AD (odds ratio = 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.04–1.24; p = 0.004). In the reverse direction, Mendelian randomization suggested no causal effect of genetically proxied risk of AD on circulating GDF-15 (p = 0.450). The causal effects of GDF-15 on PD (p = 0.597) or ALS (p = 0.120) were not identified, and the MR results likewise did not support the association of genetic liability to PD or ALS with genetically predicted levels of GDF-15. No evident heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy was revealed by multiple sensitivity analyses.ConclusionWe highlighted the role of GDF-15 in AD as altogether a promising diagnostic marker and a therapeutic target.

Herpesvirus Infections and Alzheimer’s Disease: A Mendelian Randomization Study 

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shu-Yi Huang ◽  
Yu-Xiang Yang ◽  
Kevin Kuo ◽  
Hong-Qi Li ◽  
Xue-Ning Shen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Family History ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Summary Statistics ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Varicella Zoster ◽  
History Of

Abstract BackgroundObservational studies have suggested that herpesvirus infection increased the risk of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but it is unclear whether the association is causal. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the causal relationship between four herpesvirus infections and AD. MethodsWe performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis to investigate association of four active herpesvirus infections with AD using summary statistics from genome-wide association studies. The four herpesvirus infections (i.e., chickenpox, shingles, cold sores, mononucleosis) are caused by varicella-zoster virus, herpes simplex virus type 1, and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), respectively. A large summary statistics data from International Genomics of Alzheimer’s Project was used in primary analysis, including 21,982 AD cases and 41,944 controls. Validation was further performed using family history of AD data from UK Biobank (27,696 cases of maternal AD, 14,338 cases of paternal AD and 272,244 controls).ResultsWe found evidence of a suggestive association between mononucleosis (caused by EBV) and risk of AD (odds ratio [OR] = 1.634, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.092-2.446, P = 0.017) after Bonferroni correction. It has been verified in validation analysis that mononucleosis is also associated with family history of AD (OR [95% CI] = 1.392 [1.061, 1.826], P=0.017). Genetically predicted shingles were associated with AD risk (OR [95% CI] = 0.867 [0.784, 0.958], P = 0.005). While genetically predicted chickenpox was suggestively associated with increased family history of AD (OR [95% CI] = 1.147 [1.007, 1.307], P = 0.039).ConclusionsOur findings provided evidence supporting a positive relationship between mononucleosis and AD, indicating a causal link between EBV infection and AD. Further elucidations of this association and underlying mechanisms are likely to identify feasible interventions to promote AD prevention.

scholarly journals Mendelian randomization identifies blood metabolites previously linked to midlife cognition as causal candidates in Alzheimer’s disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (16) ◽  
pp. e2009808118
Author(s):  
Jodie Lord ◽  
Bradley Jermy ◽  
Rebecca Green ◽  
Andrew Wong ◽  
Jin Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Bayesian Model Averaging ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Model Averaging ◽  
High Density Lipoproteins ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Causal Pathway ◽  
Target Disease

There are currently no disease-modifying treatments for Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and an understanding of preclinical causal biomarkers to help target disease pathogenesis in the earliest phases remains elusive. Here, we investigated whether 19 metabolites previously associated with midlife cognition—a preclinical predictor of AD—translate to later clinical risk, using Mendelian randomization (MR) to tease out AD-specific causal relationships. Summary statistics from the largest genome-wide association studies (GWASs) for AD and metabolites were used to perform bidirectional univariable MR. Bayesian model averaging (BMA) was additionally performed to address high correlation between metabolites and identify metabolite combinations that may be on the AD causal pathway. Univariable MR indicated four extra-large high-density lipoproteins (XL.HDL) on the causal pathway to AD: free cholesterol (XL.HDL.FC: 95% CI = 0.78 to 0.94), total lipids (XL.HDL.L: 95% CI = 0.80 to 0.97), phospholipids (XL.HDL.PL: 95% CI = 0.81 to 0.97), and concentration of XL.HDL particles (95% CI = 0.79 to 0.96), significant at an adjusted P < 0.009. MR–BMA corroborated XL.HDL.FC to be among the top three causal metabolites, in addition to total cholesterol in XL.HDL (XL.HDL.C) and glycoprotein acetyls (GP). Both XL.HDL.C and GP demonstrated suggestive univariable evidence of causality (P < 0.05), and GP successfully replicated within an independent dataset. This study offers insight into the causal relationship between metabolites demonstrating association with midlife cognition and AD. It highlights GP in addition to several XL.HDLs—particularly XL.HDL.FC—as causal candidates warranting further investigation. As AD pathology is thought to develop decades prior to symptom onset, expanding on these findings could inform risk reduction strategies.

scholarly journals Physical activity and risk of Alzheimer’s disease: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian E Baumeister ◽  
André Karch ◽  
Martin Bahls ◽  
Alexander Teumer ◽  
Michael F Leitzmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Protective Factor ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Nucleotide Polymorphisms ◽  
Inverse Variance

ABSTRACTIntroductionEvidence from observational studies for the effect of physical activity on the risk of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is inconclusive. We performed Mendelian randomization analysis to examine whether physical activity is a protective factor for AD.MethodsSummary data of genome-wide association studies on physical activity and AD were identified using PubMed and the GWAS catalog. The study population included 21,982 AD cases and 41,944 cognitively normal controls. Eight single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) known at P < 5×10−8 to be associated with accelerometer-assessed physical activity served as instrumental variables.ResultsGenetically predicted accelerometer-assessed physical activity had no effect on the risk of AD (inverse variance weighted odds ratio [OR] per standard deviation (SD) increment: 1.03, 95% confidence interval: 0.97-1.10, P=0.332).DiscussionThe present study does not support a relationship between physical activity and risk of AD, and suggests that previous observational studies might have been biased.

scholarly journals Herpesvirus infections and Alzheimer’s disease: a Mendelian randomization study

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shu-Yi Huang ◽  
Yu-Xiang Yang ◽  
Kevin Kuo ◽  
Hong-Qi Li ◽  
Xue-Ning Shen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Family History ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Summary Statistics ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Varicella Zoster ◽  
History Of

Abstract Background Observational studies have suggested that herpesvirus infection increased the risk of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but it is unclear whether the association is causal. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the causal relationship between four herpesvirus infections and AD. Methods We performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis to investigate association of four active herpesvirus infections with AD using summary statistics from genome-wide association studies. The four herpesvirus infections (i.e., chickenpox, shingles, cold sores, mononucleosis) are caused by varicella-zoster virus, herpes simplex virus type 1, and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), respectively. A large summary statistics data from International Genomics of Alzheimer’s Project was used in primary analysis, including 21,982 AD cases and 41,944 controls. Validation was further performed using family history of AD data from UK Biobank (27,696 cases of maternal AD, 14,338 cases of paternal AD and 272,244 controls). Results We found evidence of a significant association between mononucleosis (caused by EBV) and risk of AD after false discovery rates (FDR) correction (odds ratio [OR] = 1.634, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.092–2.446, P = 0.017, FDR-corrected P = 0.034). It has been verified in validation analysis that mononucleosis is also associated with family history of AD (OR [95% CI] = 1.392 [1.061, 1.826], P = 0.017). Genetically predicted shingles were associated with AD risk (OR [95% CI] = 0.867 [0.784, 0.958], P = 0.005, FDR-corrected P = 0.020), while genetically predicted chickenpox was suggestively associated with increased family history of AD (OR [95% CI] = 1.147 [1.007, 1.307], P = 0.039). Conclusions Our findings provided evidence supporting a positive relationship between mononucleosis and AD, indicating a causal link between EBV infection and AD. Further elucidations of this association and underlying mechanisms are likely to identify feasible interventions to promote AD prevention.

scholarly journals Bias in two-sample Mendelian randomization when using heritable covariable-adjusted summary associations

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Pires Hartwig ◽  
Kate Tilling ◽  
George Davey Smith ◽  
Deborah A Lawlor ◽  
Maria Carolina Borges
Keyword(s):  
Waist Circumference ◽  
Genetic Variants ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Causal Effect ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Real Data ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Effect Estimate ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Residual Confounding

Abstract Background Two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) allows the use of freely accessible summary association results from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to estimate causal effects of modifiable exposures on outcomes. Some GWAS adjust for heritable covariables in an attempt to estimate direct effects of genetic variants on the trait of interest. One, both or neither of the exposure GWAS and outcome GWAS may have been adjusted for covariables. Methods We performed a simulation study comprising different scenarios that could motivate covariable adjustment in a GWAS and analysed real data to assess the influence of using covariable-adjusted summary association results in two-sample MR. Results In the absence of residual confounding between exposure and covariable, between exposure and outcome, and between covariable and outcome, using covariable-adjusted summary associations for two-sample MR eliminated bias due to horizontal pleiotropy. However, covariable adjustment led to bias in the presence of residual confounding (especially between the covariable and the outcome), even in the absence of horizontal pleiotropy (when the genetic variants would be valid instruments without covariable adjustment). In an analysis using real data from the Genetic Investigation of ANthropometric Traits (GIANT) consortium and UK Biobank, the causal effect estimate of waist circumference on blood pressure changed direction upon adjustment of waist circumference for body mass index. Conclusions Our findings indicate that using covariable-adjusted summary associations in MR should generally be avoided. When that is not possible, careful consideration of the causal relationships underlying the data (including potentially unmeasured confounders) is required to direct sensitivity analyses and interpret results with appropriate caution.

scholarly journals The clinical utility of gene testing for Alzheimer’s disease

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily R. Atkins ◽  
Peter K. Panegyres
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Early Onset ◽  
Late Onset ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Susceptibility Gene ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Apoe Ε4 ◽  
Gene Testing ◽  
A Genome

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the largest cause of dementia, affecting 35.6 million people in 2010. Amyloid precursor protein, presenilin 1 and presenilin 2 mutations are known to cause familial early-onset AD, whereas apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 is a susceptibility gene for late-onset AD. The genes for phosphatidylinositol- binding clathrin assembly protein, clusterin and complement receptor 1 have recently been described by genome-wide association studies as potential risk factors for lateonset AD. Also, a genome association study using single neucleotide polymorphisms has identified an association of neuronal sortilin related receptor and late-onset AD. Gene testing, and also predictive gene testing, may be of benefit in suspected familial early-onset AD however it adds little to the diagnosis of lateonset AD and does not alter the treatment. We do not recommend APOE ε4 genotyping.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document