A synthesis of common guidelines for regulatory compliance verification in the context of ICT governance audits1

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Maria Cristina Clara ◽  
Edna Dias Canedo ◽  
Rafael Timóteo de Sousa Júnior
Keyword(s):  
Regulatory Compliance ◽  
Compliance Verification

scholarly journals Arbitration and compliance verification

2019 ◽  
pp. 70-79
Author(s):  
O. A. Benedskaya
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Regulatory Compliance ◽  
Regulatory Control ◽  
State Court ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
Regulatory Law ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Compliance Verification ◽  
The Right

The article is devoted to the analysis of arbitration proceedings in the context of its participation in the implementation of judicial regulatory compliance verification. The fact that the arbitration court is bound by the requirement of legality and the need to implement casual regulatory control in accordance with the existing conflict of laws rules is substantiated based on the idea of the universal nature of the constitutional imperative of the rule of law and the Constitution of the Russian Federation and the understanding of the threefold nature of the arbitration court that combines social and jurisdictional, self-regulatory (law-forming) and mediation (conciliation) principles. At the same time, the legal nature of the arbitration proceedings should, in the author’s opinion, be disclosed not in a formal dogmatic manner or through commitment to the requirements of legal discipline as strict as in the state court, but on the basis of judicial activism and development of law in the context of social and business practice. The arbitration court may act contra legem to enhance the protection of the rights of the parties to the proceedings based on general, constitutional and sectoral principles of law. Faced with the applicable rule that violates the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the arbitration court must have the right to request the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation (also in the form of a request obligation, if the decision of the arbitration court is final).

Communication Disordered: Program Implementation in Long-Term Care

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (15) ◽  
pp. 64-67
Author(s):  
George Barnes ◽  
Joseph Salemi
Keyword(s):  
Program Implementation ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Family Satisfaction ◽  
Regulatory Compliance ◽  
Care Staff ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Staff Members ◽  
Change Policy

The organizational structure of long-term care (LTC) facilities often removes the rehab department from the interdisciplinary work culture, inhibiting the speech-language pathologist's (SLP's) communication with the facility administration and limiting the SLP's influence when implementing clinical programs. The SLP then is unable to change policy or monitor the actions of the care staff. When the SLP asks staff members to follow protocols not yet accepted by facility policy, staff may be unable to respond due to confusing or conflicting protocol. The SLP needs to involve members of the facility administration in the policy-making process in order to create successful clinical programs. The SLP must overcome communication barriers by understanding the needs of the administration to explain how staff compliance with clinical goals improves quality of care, regulatory compliance, and patient-family satisfaction, and has the potential to enhance revenue for the facility. By taking this approach, the SLP has a greater opportunity to increase safety, independence, and quality of life for patients who otherwise may not receive access to the appropriate services.

New Paradigm for State Department of Transportation Environmental Initiatives: New York State’s Guidelines and Procedures

2000 ◽  
Vol 1702 (1) ◽  
pp. 92-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary McVoy ◽  
Mark Sengenberger ◽  
Elizabeth Novak
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
New York State ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
State Department ◽  
Regulatory Compliance ◽  
Environmental Benefits ◽  
Environmental Damage ◽  
York State Department ◽  
Department Of Transportation ◽  
New Paradigm

Public-works agencies have an obligation to enhance the environment as opportunities arise. The New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) has developed an environmental initiative to make an affirmative contribution to the environment, using the department’s organizational strengths. The environmental initiative is a paradigm shift applicable to all departments of transportation (DOTs). Conventional reactive regulatory compliance can reduce unnecessary environmental damage and sometimes gain grudging regulatory agency cooperation; however, it is not a positive, satisfying way of doing the people’s work. Through proactive steps, NYSDOT has become an important part of the state’s environmental solution (often at little or no additional cost) and has changed its working relationships with environmental agencies and groups. As these agencies and groups have become partners, instead of adversaries, permit-approval times have improved, mitigation costs have declined, morale has improved, and cost-effective environmental benefits are being realized. Procedures are outlined to apply the engineering capabilities of a DOT to the environmental-stewardship responsibilities shared by all governmental organizations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document