Curative effect of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with radiofrequency ablation in treating hepatic cell carcinoma and its effect on serum markers

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fu-Qiang Jiang ◽  
Wei Lu ◽  
Chao Yang ◽  
Peng Du ◽  
Jun-Peng Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization ◽  
Serum Markers ◽  
Hepatic Cell ◽  
Curative Effect ◽  
Hepatic Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Arterial Chemoembolization

scholarly journals Individual or combined transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a time-to-event meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuang Jiang ◽  
Gong Cheng ◽  
Mingheng Liao ◽  
Jiwei Huang
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Similar Rate ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
China National Knowledge Infrastructure ◽  
Knowledge Infrastructure ◽  
Arterial Chemoembolization

Abstract Background There is still some debate as to whether transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is better than TACE or RFA alone. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of TACE plus RFA for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with RFA or TACE alone. Methods We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) for all relevant randomized controlled trials and retrospective studies reporting overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and complications of TACE plus RFA for HCC, compared with RFA or TACE alone. Results Twenty-one studies involving 3413 patients were included. TACE combined with RFA was associated with better OS (hazard ratio [HR]=0.62, 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 0.55–0.71, P < 0.001) and RFS (HR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.39–0.69, P < 0.001) than TACE alone; compared with RFA alone, TACE plus RFA resulted in longer OS (HR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.53–0.75, P < 0.001) and RFS (HR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.51–0.71, P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses by tumor size also showed that combined treatment resulted in better OS and RFS compared with RFA alone in patients with HCC larger than 3 cm. Combined treatment resulted in similar rate of major complications compared with TACE or RFA alone (OR = 1.78, 95% CI = 0.99–3.20, P = 0.05; OR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.42–2.38, P = 1.00, respectively). Conclusions TACE combined with RFA was more effective for HCC than TACE alone. For patients with a tumor larger than 3 cm, the combined treatment also achieved a better effect than RFA alone.

Histopathological study on primary hepatic cell carcinoma and the association with liver cirrhosis

1971 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 270-270
Author(s):  
K. Nakagawa ◽  
K. Watanabe ◽  
K. Sasamoto ◽  
K. Kurizawa ◽  
H. Itakura
Keyword(s):  
Liver Cirrhosis ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Hepatic Cell ◽  
Histopathological Study ◽  
Hepatic Cell Carcinoma

scholarly journals Combination of radiofrequency ablation and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization to treat hepatocellular carcinoma: measurement of distance from needle tip to nodule for assessment of local tumor progression

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 2516-2523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wang Haochen ◽  
Wang Jian ◽  
Song Li ◽  
Lv Tianshi ◽  
Tong Xiaoqiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Tumor Progression ◽  
Minimum Distance ◽  
Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Local Tumor Progression ◽  
Local Tumor ◽  
Arterial Chemoembolization

Objective This study was performed to determine the relationship between the minimum distance from the radiofrequency ablation (RFA) needle tip to the tumor and local tumor progression (LTP) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) nodules and identify prognostic factors for LTP. Methods We reviewed 197 patients (197 nodules) who underwent RFA after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for HCC from January 2010 to January 2015. Three-dimensional registration of images was used to calculate the minimum distance from the tip to the tumor. We then divided the minimum distance into two groups: <2 and ≥2 mm. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography was performed after treatment. The LTP rate was calculated 1 and 3 years after RFA. We performed multivariate analysis to identify independent prognostic factors for LTP. Results The cumulative 1-year LTP rates in the <2- and ≥2-mm groups were 82.7% and 4.3%, respectively, and the cumulative 3-year LTP rates in the two groups were 94.8% and 10.8%, respectively. The minimum distance from the needle tip to the tumor was an independent prognostic factor for LTP. Conclusions A minimum distance of 2 mm from the needle tip to the tumor should be completely ablated along with the tumor.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document