Microvessel density as a prognostic factor in bladder cancer: A systematic review of literature and meta-analysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 505-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Huang ◽  
Xuelei Ma ◽  
Xiangjun Chen ◽  
Xiaoxiao Liu ◽  
Binglan Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Microvessel Density ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Review Of Literature

A Meta Analytic Review of the Relationship between Emotional Intelligence and Leadership Effectiveness

2019 ◽  
Vol 118 (9) ◽  
pp. 118-126
Author(s):  
Augusty P. A ◽  
Jain Mathew
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Emotional Intelligence ◽  
Direct Relationship ◽  
Effective Leadership ◽  
Leadership Effectiveness ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Review Of Literature ◽  
Analytic Review ◽  
The Relationship

The study evaluates the relationship between Emotional Intelligence and Leadership Effectiveness through a Systematic Review of Literature. The relationship has been evaluated in two steps. First, a Systematic review of literature was done to provide a theoretical framework to link the dimensions of Emotional Intelligence to the elements of effective leadership. Meta-analysis was then used to consolidate empirical evidence of the relationship. The studies for the meta-analysis were sourced from Pro Quest and EBSCO and the correlation coefficients of the studies were analysed. Only articles that presented the direct relationship between the variables were included in the study. The results of the analysis revealed a strong, statistically significant relationship between emotional intelligence and effective leadership. The findings of the study provide evidence for the proposition that Emotional Intelligence and Leadership Effectiveness are interrelated.

scholarly journals Correction to: Hemiarthroplasty for neck of femur fractures: to cement or not? A systematic review of literature and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 1835-1836
Author(s):  
Prasoon Kumar ◽  
Rajesh Kumar Rajnish ◽  
Deepak Neradi ◽  
Vishal Kumar ◽  
Saurabh Agarwal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Review Of Literature ◽  
Neck Of Femur ◽  
Femur Fractures

scholarly journals Prognostic factors for chronic post-surgical pain after lung or pleural surgery: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. e051554
Author(s):  
Pascal Richard David Clephas ◽  
Sanne Elisabeth Hoeks ◽  
Marialena Trivella ◽  
Christian S Guay ◽  
Preet Mohinder Singh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Surgical Pain ◽  
Literature Reviews ◽  
Chronic Post Surgical Pain

IntroductionChronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) after lung or pleural surgery is a common complication and associated with a decrease in quality of life, long-term use of pain medication and substantial economic costs. An abundant number of primary prognostic factor studies are published each year, but findings are often inconsistent, methods heterogeneous and the methodological quality questionable. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are therefore needed to summarise the evidence.Methods and analysisThe reporting of this protocol adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) checklist. We will include retrospective and prospective studies with a follow-up of at least 3 months reporting patient-related factors and surgery-related factors for any adult population. Randomised controlled trials will be included if they report on prognostic factors for CPSP after lung or pleural surgery. We will exclude case series, case reports, literature reviews, studies that do not report results for lung or pleural surgery separately and studies that modified the treatment or prognostic factor based on pain during the observation period. MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane, CINAHL, Google Scholar and relevant literature reviews will be searched. Independent pairs of two reviewers will assess studies in two stages based on the PICOTS criteria. We will use the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool for the quality assessment and the CHARMS-PF checklist for the data extraction of the included studies. The analyses will all be conducted separately for each identified prognostic factor. We will analyse adjusted and unadjusted estimated measures separately. When possible, evidence will be summarised with a meta-analysis and otherwise narratively. We will quantify heterogeneity by calculating the Q and I2 statistics. The heterogeneity will be further explored with meta-regression and subgroup analyses based on clinical knowledge. The quality of the evidence obtained will be evaluated according to the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation guideline 28.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval will not be necessary, as all data are already in the public domain. Results will be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021227888.

Palliative radiotherapy for bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (5) ◽  
pp. 635-644
Author(s):  
Jeremy Tey ◽  
Francis Ho ◽  
Wee Yao Koh ◽  
David Chia ◽  
Kiat Huat Ooi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Palliative Radiotherapy
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document