scholarly journals An Approach for Agile Engineering Change Management Within Global Product Development

Author(s):  
Roberto Riascos ◽  
Egon Ostrosi ◽  
Jean-Claude Sagot ◽  
Josip Stjepandić

Engineering Change Management (ECM) is an essential constituent of any product development project, these project are highly dynamic process of knowledge generation and reuse for products, projects, processes and resources within a enterprise. Currently, ECM is fully document-, and at least partially paper-based, and needs to be transformed to a fully model-based standard workflow. Changes, uncertainty and hidden processes should be seen as regular events. For the agile process, a rapid and flexible handling of task items is necessary. Due to the unpredictable character and short time of singular task items, we have developed a new approach to collect all changes to a superordinate, master change note as a standard, common object in the product structure, and to and update this master change note as often as necessary. This change note is assigned to a product during its entire lifecycle. It collects changes in the product and related processes and equipment. We present a new approach in order to facilitate a full object-oriented support of all activities related to the change process. On each update, singular task items can be re-prioritized within this master change note according to the current needs.

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inayat Ullah ◽  
Dunbing Tang ◽  
Qi Wang ◽  
Leilei Yin ◽  
Ishfaq Hussain

Product redesign is not a straightforward task, specifically for complex commodities. Engineering change requirements can be evoked in any phase of the product development process, thus making engineering change management a challenging task. The motive of this study is to explore the best possible way of managing engineering change requirements taking execution sequence of change requirements into consideration. In this article, a new approach supporting engineering change requirements implementation sequence, by considering the risk associated with engineering changes, is presented. The risk of the redesign is hard to foresee since the engineering change effects are being dispersed from the instigating component to other associated components. In this article, the term of rework-risk is used for the amount of rework needed to be done to redesign the products’ components. The practicality of suggested method is analyzed using the redesign of an optical mouse as a case study. Managing engineering change requirements in a group with proper sequence can ensue with a 15% decrease in the redesign duration as compared with the prompt implementation of engineering change requirements. Conversely, it can also cause 36.23% increase in the redesign duration, if not handled in an appropriate sequence. The results from a single, simple case, indicates that running engineering change requirement batches can be beneficial.


Procedia CIRP ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 63 ◽  
pp. 342-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Günther Schuh ◽  
Thomas Gartzen ◽  
Samuel Soucy-Bouchard ◽  
Felix Basse

Procedia CIRP ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 70 ◽  
pp. 72-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Schuh ◽  
J.-P. Prote ◽  
M. Luckert ◽  
F. Basse ◽  
V. Thomson ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suvi Nenonen ◽  
Minna Andersson ◽  
Mervi Huhtelin ◽  
Juha-Matti Junnonen ◽  
Arja-Liisa Kaasinen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document