scholarly journals Enhancement of Routing Protocols for Mobile Adhoc Network

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajakumar.R ◽  
PandianR ◽  
PremJacob.T ◽  
Pravin.A ◽  
Indumathi.P
Keyword(s):  
Routing Protocols ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Network Routing ◽  
Limited Time ◽  
Mobile Adhoc Network ◽  
Adhoc Network ◽  
Efficient Route ◽  
Simulation Results ◽  
Application Specific ◽  
Specific Scenario

The primaryaim of an ad-hoc network routing protocol is accurate and efficient route creation between node pairs so that messages may be delivered promptly. Route creation need to be done with reduced overhead and bandwidth. This paper presents a scheme to reduce bandwidth and power by the hibernation of nodes for a limited time. The effect of our proposal is then studied by simulation under various conditions and the analysis of the simulation results is done to comprehend the working of our protocol in various areas and how it fares in an application specific scenario.

scholarly journals An overview of various ad hoc routing protocols in MANET

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2.21) ◽  
pp. 364
Author(s):  
Saritha Arumugam ◽  
N Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Wireless Network ◽  
Routing Protocols ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Mobile Ad Hoc Network ◽  
Network Routing ◽  
Delivery Ratio ◽  
Large Network ◽  
Ad Hoc Routing ◽  
Adhoc Network ◽  
Background Traffic

Mobile ad hoc network is a wireless network which has peer to peer process .it is established to achieve a group of network to be connected in wireless network. It is a large network that transfers the data from source to destination .Here we are computing the routing protocols like (DSDV, AODV, OLSR, DSR, TORA, and ZRP) which is analyzed in the form of packet delivery ratio, throughput, end to end delay, Routing overhead. There are three types of ADHOC network routing protocol 1) table driven proactive protocol acts as background traffic generally, in ADHOC  network the location of one node is send to other node through location this nodes transfer the data from one to other its done by DSDV and WRP. 2) on demand driven reactive it establish route between nodes when they are required to route packet data it is done by DSR and AODV. 3)  hybrid protocol each node has its own zone radius. 

Performance Analysis of MANET Proactive and Reactive Routing Protocols Using Network Simulator 2

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 251
Author(s):  
I Wayan Adi Saputra ◽  
I Komang Ari Mogi
Keyword(s):  
Ad Hoc Networks ◽  
Mobile Ad Hoc Networks ◽  
Routing Protocol ◽  
Routing Protocols ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Network Routing ◽  
Propagation Model ◽  
Simulation Results ◽  
Mobile Ad Hoc ◽  
Hoc Networks

The development of Mobile ad hoc networks (MANET) has the nature and character of a fast, costeffective. The development of Mobile ad hoc networks (MANET) has the nature and character of a fast, cost-effective deployment and able to manage the topology independently. This has caused in recent years, MANET to be an interesting and popular thing to study. MANET can be applied even in difficult areas, forest fire detection, military operations and even health monitoring. Changes in the topology dynamically on MANET, limited energy consumption, and built without existing infrastructure are a problem in MANET. Problems especially dynamic topology changes make routing very important in MANET design. This article aims to analyze AODV, DSDV and DSR routing protocols based on quality of service (QoS). The test scenario is based on the number of nodes, packet size, area of simulation, simulation time, simulation speed, mobility model, and propagation model. The simulation that has been done produces 4 graphs, each of which explains the packet delivery ratio, throughput, network routing load, and delay. Simulation results are obtained using NS2 network simulators through *. Tcl files and generate *. Tr (trace) and *.nam (animator) files. Simulation results show that the DSR routing protocol has better performance than AODV and DSDV in terms of pdr, throughput, network routing load, and delay. The average value of the DSR routing protocol is 657,498 on throughput and 0.244 milliseconds on delay.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document