scholarly journals Imaging Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Practical Guide for Clinicians

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nasim Sheikh-Bahaei ◽  
Seyed Ahmad Sajjadi ◽  
Roido Manavaki ◽  
Jonathan Harvey Gillard
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Imaging Biomarkers ◽  
Practical Guide

scholarly journals Association of naturally occurring antibodies to β-amyloid with cognitive decline and cerebral amyloidosis in Alzheimer’s disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. eabb0457
Author(s):  
Yu-Hui Liu ◽  
Jun Wang ◽  
Qiao-Xin Li ◽  
Christopher J. Fowler ◽  
Fan Zeng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Cognitive Decline ◽  
Plasma Levels ◽  
Imaging Biomarkers ◽  
Amino Terminus ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Naturally Occurring ◽  
Β Amyloid ◽  
Naturally Occurring Antibodies

The pathological relevance of naturally occurring antibodies to β-amyloid (NAbs-Aβ) in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) remains unclear. We aimed to investigate their levels and associations with Aβ burden and cognitive decline in AD in a cross-sectional cohort from China and a longitudinal cohort from the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study. NAbs-Aβ levels in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were tested according to their epitopes. Levels of NAbs targeting the amino terminus of Aβ increased, and those targeting the mid-domain of Aβ decreased in both CSF and plasma in AD patients. Higher plasma levels of NAbs targeting the amino terminus of Aβ and lower plasma levels of NAbs targeting the mid-domain of Aβ were associated with higher brain amyloidosis at baseline and faster cognitive decline during follow-up. Our findings suggest a dynamic response of the adaptive immune system in the progression of AD and are relevant to current passive immunotherapeutic strategies.

scholarly journals Imaging and Molecular Mechanisms of Alzheimer’s Disease: A Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 3702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grazia Femminella ◽  
Tony Thayanandan ◽  
Valeria Calsolaro ◽  
Klara Komici ◽  
Giuseppe Rengo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Multimodal Imaging ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Imaging Techniques ◽  
Structural Mri ◽  
Imaging Biomarkers ◽  
Significant Burden ◽  
Made In

Alzheimer’s disease is the most common form of dementia and is a significant burden for affected patients, carers, and health systems. Great advances have been made in understanding its pathophysiology, to a point that we are moving from a purely clinical diagnosis to a biological one based on the use of biomarkers. Among those, imaging biomarkers are invaluable in Alzheimer’s, as they provide an in vivo window to the pathological processes occurring in Alzheimer’s brain. While some imaging techniques are still under evaluation in the research setting, some have reached widespread clinical use. In this review, we provide an overview of the most commonly used imaging biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease, from molecular PET imaging to structural MRI, emphasising the concept that multimodal imaging would likely prove to be the optimal tool in the future of Alzheimer’s research and clinical practice.

scholarly journals Fluid and imaging biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease: Where we stand and where to head to

2018 ◽  
Vol 107 ◽  
pp. 169-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriane Dallanora Henriques ◽  
Andrea Lessa Benedet ◽  
Einstein Francisco Camargos ◽  
Pedro Rosa-Neto ◽  
Otávio Toledo Nóbrega
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Imaging Biomarkers

Structural, Functional, and Molecular Neuroimaging Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s Disease

2013 ◽  
pp. 821-825
Author(s):  
James B. Brewer ◽  
Jorge Sepulcre ◽  
Keith A. Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Neurodegenerative Disorders ◽  
Brain Dysfunction ◽  
Imaging Biomarkers ◽  
Neurocognitive Evaluation ◽  
Neuroimaging Biomarkers

Advances in quantitative structural, functional, and molecular neuroimaging have provided new tools for objective, in vivo, assessment of critical aspects of Alzheimer’s disease and other neurodegenerative disorders. Measures of brain atrophy or brain dysfunction, coupled with measures of disease-linked pathology, might complement the history, physical and neurocognitive evaluation of patients and thereby improve predictive prognosis, especially at early stages of cognitive impairment where neurodegenerative etiology is less certain. Such imaging biomarkers are currently used in nearly all clinical trials of therapeutic agents for Alzheimer’s disease and are increasingly incorporated into clinical practice. In this chapter, imaging biomarkers are introduced and discussed to familiarize the reader with their potential research and clinical uses.

scholarly journals Molecular and Imaging Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Focus on Recent Insights

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiara Villa ◽  
Marialuisa Lavitrano ◽  
Elena Salvatore ◽  
Romina Combi
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Biological Fluids ◽  
Imaging Techniques ◽  
Amyloid Β ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Diagnostic Methods ◽  
Imaging Biomarkers ◽  
Attractive Alternative

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common neurodegenerative disease among the elderly, affecting millions of people worldwide and clinically characterized by a progressive and irreversible cognitive decline. The rapid increase in the incidence of AD highlights the need for an easy, efficient and accurate diagnosis of the disease in its initial stages in order to halt or delay the progression. The currently used diagnostic methods rely on measures of amyloid-β (Aβ), phosphorylated (p-tau) and total tau (t-tau) protein levels in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) aided by advanced neuroimaging techniques like positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, the invasiveness of these procedures and the high cost restrict their utilization. Hence, biomarkers from biological fluids obtained using non-invasive methods and novel neuroimaging approaches provide an attractive alternative for the early diagnosis of AD. Such biomarkers may also be helpful for better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the disease, allowing differential diagnosis or at least prolonging the pre-symptomatic stage in patients suffering from AD. Herein, we discuss the advantages and limits of the conventional biomarkers as well as recent promising candidates from alternative body fluids and new imaging techniques.

scholarly journals Amyloid and tau imaging biomarkers explain cognitive decline from late middle-age

Brain ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 143 (1) ◽  
pp. 320-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobey J Betthauser ◽  
Rebecca L Koscik ◽  
Erin M Jonaitis ◽  
Samantha L Allison ◽  
Karly A Cody ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Cognitive Decline ◽  
Middle Age ◽  
Neurofibrillary Tangle ◽  
Imaging Biomarkers ◽  
Cognitive Tests ◽  
Preclinical Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Significant Group ◽  
Health Factors

Abstract This study investigated differences in retrospective cognitive trajectories between amyloid and tau PET biomarker stratified groups in initially cognitively unimpaired participants sampled from the Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer’s Prevention. One hundred and sixty-seven initially unimpaired individuals (baseline age 59 ± 6 years; 115 females) were stratified by elevated amyloid-β and tau status based on 11C-Pittsburgh compound B (PiB) and 18F-MK-6240 PET imaging. Mixed effects models were used to determine if longitudinal cognitive trajectories based on a composite of cognitive tests including memory and executive function differed between biomarker groups. Secondary analyses investigated group differences for a variety of cross-sectional health and cognitive tests, and associations between 18F-MK-6240, 11C-PiB, and age. A significant group × age interaction was observed with post hoc comparisons indicating that the group with both elevated amyloid and tau pathophysiology were declining approximately three times faster in retrospective cognition compared to those with just one or no elevated biomarkers. This result was robust against various thresholds and medial temporal lobe regions defining elevated tau. Participants were relatively healthy and mostly did not differ between biomarker groups in health factors at the beginning or end of study, or most cognitive measures at study entry. Analyses investigating association between age, MK-6240 and PiB indicated weak associations between age and 18F-MK-6240 in tangle-associated regions, which were negligible after adjusting for 11C-PiB. Strong associations, particularly in entorhinal cortex, hippocampus and amygdala, were observed between 18F-MK-6240 and global 11C-PiB in regions associated with Braak neurofibrillary tangle stages I–VI. These results suggest that the combination of pathological amyloid and tau is detrimental to cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease during late middle-age. Within the Alzheimer’s disease continuum, middle-age health factors likely do not greatly influence preclinical cognitive decline. Future studies in a larger preclinical sample are needed to determine if and to what extent individual contributions of amyloid and tau affect cognitive decline. 18F-MK-6240 shows promise as a sensitive biomarker for detecting neurofibrillary tangles in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document