Klassiker der Strategie – eine Bewertung

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert A. Stahel
Keyword(s):  

Nach dem Ende des kalten Krieges und dem Zusammenbruch der Sowjetunion glaubte man, die Zeit der Konfrontationen sei vorbei. Diese Hoffnung erweist sich heute angesichts der vielen regionalen Konflikte als falsch. Das Ende des kalten Krieges mag das Ende der grossen Konfrontationen und damit der grossen Kriege bewirkt haben, lokale Auseinandersetzungen resp. die "kleinen Kriege" sowie die klassische Machtpolitik der Grossmächte werden aber dadurch nicht verhindert. Mit den neuen Entwicklungen gewinnt die Strategie als die Wissenschaft der Kriegsführung wieder an Interesse. Die Strategie der politischen, wirtschaftlichen und militärischen Bewältigung kleiner Konflikte und Kriege wird künftig zunehmende Bedeutung erlangen. Ausgehend von einer systematischen Darstellung der Klassiker der Strategie (Sun Tzu, Machiavelli, Clausewitz, Liddell Hart) zeigt der Autor, dass deren Konzepte wichtige Impulse für die Lösung aktueller Probleme geben können.

1998 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-72
Author(s):  
Sashibhusan Rath
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Timothy Walton
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 38
Author(s):  
Fenny Widyani Hartanto ◽  
Maria Yoshephine Dwi Hayu Agustini

Sun Tzu’s strategy is actually an art of war used by Chinese military under Sun Tzu to win the war. Its application has been widespread beyond the military strategy. It has also been adopted for business strategy. This manuscript is to examine applicability of Sun Tzu’s strategy on marketing. In particularly it examines if Sun Tzu’s strategy can be applied as marketing strategy. Review manuscripts in related topics and a case study on a company are the method for the examination. The result indicates that Sun Tzu’s strategy is applicable in marketing and can be related with specific marketing terms.


2021 ◽  
pp. 88-103
Author(s):  
K. M. Fierke

This chapter examines two of the most famous grand strategies with origins in Asia, identified with Sun Tzu and Gandhi. On the surface they would appear to be unfit for comparison. While Sun Tzu belongs to a tradition of military strategy, and is now part of the classical canon, Gandhi is identified with the nonviolent strategy of nonstate actors. The intention in examining the two together is to explore a family resemblance in their respective conceptions of grand strategy, even while recognizing that they are very distinct. After setting out some broad contrasts regarding cosmology, ontology, and epistemology, the chapter zooms in on the relevance of these points more specifically for understanding Sun Tzu or Gandhi. It concludes with some reflections on why the contrasts are important in a globalizing world. Both cases highlight the importance, if possible, of achieving objectives without recourse to military force, which, it argues, arises from a relational cosmology, where harmony and diversity coexist, and in which truth is not uniform but multiperspectival.


Author(s):  
Mie Augier ◽  
Jerry Guo
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document