scholarly journals A Method for Correcting Undrained Shear Strength for Sample Disturbance

1985 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akio Nakase ◽  
Osamu Kusakabe ◽  
Hiroshi Nomura
Keyword(s):  
Shear Strength ◽  
Undrained Shear Strength ◽  
Sample Disturbance ◽  
Undrained Shear

scholarly journals Effect of sample disturbance on triaxial and oedometer behaviour of a stiff and heavily overconsolidated clay

2014 ◽  
Vol 51 (8) ◽  
pp. 896-910 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toralv Berre
Keyword(s):  
Shear Strength ◽  
Water Content ◽  
In Situ Stress ◽  
Undrained Shear Strength ◽  
Stress Strain ◽  
Effective Stresses ◽  
Sample Disturbance ◽  
Oedometer Tests ◽  
Undrained Shear

The tests in this investigation were performed on a natural soft clay with plasticity index around 32%, which was K0 consolidated to a vertical stress of 2942 kPa and then K0 unloaded to a vertical stress of 74 kPa (i.e., to the “in situ” stress). The specimens so created were disturbed in various ways to study the effect of sample disturbance on the stress–strain relationships during undrained shearing and during drained K0 loading (i.e., K0 triaxial and oedometer tests). The results for two testing alternatives may be summarized as follows. Alternative 1: Allow the specimen to swell at the correct in situ effective stresses, but accept an initial water content that is higher than the in situ value. This alternative was found to give the best stress–strain relationships around the in situ effective stresses for undrained triaxial tests, but with undrained shear strength values up to about 20% too low, due to the swelling taking place during consolidation to the in situ effective stresses. Alternative 2: Prevent swelling by starting the test at effective stresses that are higher than the in situ stresses, but with a water content that is closer to the in situ value than if alternative 1 is chosen. Using only isotropic stresses prior to shearing, this alternative was found to give better undrained shear strength values (although up to about 14% too high) but strain values much too small around the in situ effective stresses. For oedometer tests, only alternative 2 was investigated. Also, for these tests, the strains around the in situ stress were too small, but preconsolidation stresses estimated from stress–strain curves were typically only around 60% of the true value.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Undrained Shear Strength of Miocene Clay from the Weight Sounding Test (WST)

2017 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 367-384
Author(s):  
Sebastian Olesiak
Keyword(s):  
Shear Strength ◽  
Field Testing ◽  
Field Investigation ◽  
Undrained Shear Strength ◽  
Cohesive Soils ◽  
Strength Parameters ◽  
Additional Measurement ◽  
Carpathian Foredeep ◽  
Innovative Solution ◽  
Undrained Shear

Abstract Soil strength parameters needed for the calculation of bearing capacity and stability are increasingly determined from field testing. This paper presents a method to determine the undrained shear strength cuWST of the soil, based on the Weight Sounding Test (WST). The innovative solution which allows for a significant reduction of equipment needed for geotechnical field investigation is presented. The proposed method is based on an additional measurement of the torque during testing. It then becomes possible to estimate the undrained shear strength, cuWST of the soil, using the correlation given in this paper. The research results presented in this paper were carried out on selected cohesive soils, Miocene clays from the Carpathian Foredeep.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document