scholarly journals Sea-ice freeboard retrieval using digital photon-counting laser altimetry

2015 ◽  
Vol 56 (69) ◽  
pp. 167-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sinéad L. Farrell ◽  
Kelly M. Brunt ◽  
Julia M. Ruth ◽  
John M. Kuhn ◽  
Laurence N. Connor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Photon Counting ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Laser Altimeter ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
Counting Data ◽  
Digital Photon Counting ◽  
Arctic Ice ◽  
Ice Floes

AbstractAirborne and spaceborne altimeters provide measurements of sea-ice elevation, from which sea-ice freeboard and thickness may be derived. Observations of the Arctic ice pack by satellite altimeters indicate a significant decline in ice thickness, and volume, over the last decade. NASA’s Ice, Cloud and land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2) is a next-generation laser altimeter designed to continue key sea-ice observations through the end of this decade. An airborne simulator for ICESat-2, the Multiple Altimeter Beam Experimental Lidar (MABEL), has been deployed to gather pre-launch data for mission development. We present an analysis of MABEL data gathered over sea ice in the Greenland Sea and assess the capabilities of photon-counting techniques for sea-ice freeboard retrieval. We compare freeboard estimates in the marginal ice zone derived from MABEL photon-counting data with coincident data collected by a conventional airborne laser altimeter. We find that freeboard estimates agree to within 0.03 m in the areas where sea-ice floes were interspersed with wide leads, and to within 0.07 m elsewhere. MABEL data may also be used to infer sea-ice thickness, and when compared with coincident but independent ice thickness estimates, MABEL ice thicknesses agreed to within 0.65 m or better.

Winter Arctic sea ice freeboard, snow depth and thickness variability from ICESat-2 and NESOSIM

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alek Petty ◽  
Nicole Keeney ◽  
Alex Cabaj ◽  
Paul Kushner ◽  
Nathan Kurtz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Snow Depth ◽  
Arctic Sea Ice ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
Ice Cloud ◽  
Ice Drift ◽  
Thickness Variability ◽  
Arctic Ice

<div> <div> <div> <div> <p>National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA's) Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite‐ 2 (ICESat‐2) mission was launched in September 2018 and is now providing routine, very high‐resolution estimates of surface height/type (the ATL07 product) and freeboard (the ATL10 product) across the Arctic and Southern Oceans. In recent work we used snow depth and density estimates from the NASA Eulerian Snow on Sea Ice Model (NESOSIM) together with ATL10 freeboard data to estimate sea ice thickness across the entire Arctic Ocean. Here we provide an overview of updates made to both the underlying ATL10 freeboard product and the NESOSIM model, and the subsequent impacts on our estimates of sea ice thickness including updated comparisons to the original ICESat mission and ESA’s CryoSat-2. Finally we compare our Arctic ice thickness estimates from the 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 winters and discuss possible causes of these differences based on an analysis of atmospheric data (ERA5), ice drift (NSIDC) and ice type (OSI SAF).</p> </div> </div> </div> </div>

scholarly journals On retrieving sea ice freeboard from ICESat laser altimeter

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 2329-2346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirill Khvorostovsky ◽  
Pierre Rampal
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Snow Depth ◽  
Sea Surface ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Laser Altimeter ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
Along Track ◽  
Multiyear Ice

Abstract. Sea ice freeboard derived from satellite altimetry is the basis for the estimation of sea ice thickness using the assumption of hydrostatic equilibrium. High accuracy of altimeter measurements and freeboard retrieval procedure are, therefore, required. As of today, two approaches for estimating the freeboard using laser altimeter measurements from Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite (ICESat), referred to as tie points (TP) and lowest-level elevation (LLE) methods, have been developed and applied in different studies. We reproduced these methods for the ICESat observation periods (2003–2008) in order to assess and analyse the sources of differences found in the retrieved freeboard and corresponding thickness estimates of the Arctic sea ice as produced by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) and Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC). Three main factors are found to affect the freeboard differences when applying these methods: (a) the approach used for calculation of the local sea surface references in leads (TP or LLE methods), (b) the along-track averaging scales used for this calculation, and (c) the corrections for lead width relative to the ICESat footprint and for snow depth accumulated in refrozen leads. The LLE method with 100 km averaging scale, as used to produce the GSFC data set, and the LLE method with a shorter averaging scale of 25 km both give larger freeboard estimates comparing to those derived by applying the TP method with 25 km averaging scale as used for the JPL product. Two factors, (a) and (b), contribute to the freeboard differences in approximately equal proportions, and their combined effect is, on average, about 6–7 cm. The effect of using different methods varies spatially: the LLE method tends to give lower freeboards (by up to 15 cm) over the thick multiyear ice and higher freeboards (by up to 10 cm) over first-year ice and the thin part of multiyear ice; the higher freeboards dominate. We show that the freeboard underestimation over most of these thinner parts of sea ice can be reduced to less than 2 cm when using the improved TP method proposed in this paper. The corrections for snow depth in leads and lead width, (c), are applied only for the JPL product and increase the freeboard estimates by about 7 cm on average. Thus, different approaches to calculating sea surface references and different along-track averaging scales from one side and the freeboard corrections as applied when producing the JPL data set from the other side roughly compensate each other with respect to freeboard estimation. Therefore, one may conclude that the difference in the mean sea ice thickness between the JPL and GSFC data sets reported in previous studies should be attributed mostly to different parameters used in the freeboard-to-thickness conversion.

scholarly journals On retrieving sea ice freeboard from ICESat laser altimeter

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirill Khvorostovsky ◽  
Pierre Rampal
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Sea Level ◽  
Arctic Sea Ice ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
First Year ◽  
Laser Altimeter ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Along Track

Abstract. Sea ice freeboard derived from satellite altimetry is the basis for estimation of sea ice thickness using the assumption of hydrostatic equilibrium. High accuracy of altimeter measurements and freeboard retrieval procedure are therefore required. As of today, two approaches for estimation of the freeboard using laser altimeter measurements from Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite (ICESat), referred to as tie-points (TP) and lowest-level elevation (LLE) methods, have been developed and applied in different studies. We reproduced these methods in order to assess and analyze the sources of differences found in the retrieved freeboard and corresponding thickness estimates of the Arctic sea ice as produced by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) and Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC). For the ICEsat observation periods (2003–2008) it is found that when applying the same along-track averaging scales in the two methods to calculate the local sea level references the LLE method gives significantly lower (by up to 15 cm) sea ice freeboard estimates over thick multi-year ice areas, but significantly larger estimates (by 3–5 cm in average and locally up to about 10 cm) over thin first-year ice areas, as compared to the TP method. However, we show that the difference over first-year ice areas can be reduced to less than 2 cm when using the improved TP method proposed in this paper. About 4 cm of the difference in the JPL and GSFC freeboard estimates can be attributed to the different along-track averaging scales used to calculate the local sea level references. We show that the effect of applying corrections for lead width relative to the ICESat footprint, and for snow depth accumulated in refrozen leads (as it is done for the last release of the JPL product), is very large and increase freeboard estimates by about 7 cm. Thus, the different along-track averaging scales and approaches to calculate sea surface references, from one side, and the freeboard adjustments as applied in the TP method used to produce the JPL dataset, from the other side, are roughly compensating each other with respect to freeboard estimation. Therefore the difference in the mean sea ice thickness found between the JPL and GSFC datasets should be attributed to different parameters used in the freeboard-to-thickness conversion.

Improving sea-ice cover and SST forecasts by sea-ice thickness initialization

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steffen Tietsche ◽  
Beena Balan Sarojini ◽  
Michael Mayer ◽  
Hao Zuo ◽  
Frederic Vitart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Daily Basis ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Ocean Reanalysis ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
Arctic Ice ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Melting Season

<p>A substantial amount of subseasonal-to-seasonal sea-ice variability is potentially predictable, but improved model biases and initialization techniques are needed to realize this potential. Forecasts for other Earth System components can be expected to benefit from improved sea-ice forecasts as well, because the presence of sea ice drastically alters exchanges of heat and momentum between the atmosphere and the ocean. Here, we present the impact of initializing subseasonal forecasts with observed sea-ice thickness. The newly developed sea-ice thickness data set CS2SMOS that we use is derived from radar altimetry and L-band radiance satellite observations. It allows for the first time a spatially complete view of pan-Arctic ice thickness on a near-daily basis during the freezing season. The ingestion of this data into the ECMWF ocean reanalysis system improves subseasonal forecasts of the Arctic ice edge during the melting season by up to 10%. Sea-surface temperature forecasts at high latitudes are also significantly improved during the melting season, because an improved prediction of ice-free date allows an improved forecast of the amount of seasonal warming. These results illustrate the potential for improving subseasonal-to-seasonal predictions by initializing the sea-ice thickness.</p>

Multi-Frequency Satellite Approaches for Snow on Sea Ice: first results from the POLAR+ Snow on Sea Ice ESA project

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Tsamados ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Laser Altimeter ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
Model Studies ◽  
Polar Snow ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Snow Thickness

<p>Abstract: We propose new methods for multi-frequency snow thickness retrievals building on the legacy of the Arctic+ Snow project where we developed two products: the dual-altimetry Snow Thickness (DuST) and the Snow on Drifting Sea Ice (SnoDSI). The primary objective of this project is to investigate multi-frequency approaches to retrieve snow thickness over all types of sea ice surfaces in the Arctic and provide a state-of-the-art snow product. Our approach follows ESA ITT recommendations to prioritise satellite-based products and will benefit from the recent ‘golden era in polar altimetry’ with the successful launch of the laser altimeter ICESat-2 in 2018 complementing data provided by the rich fleet of radar altimeters, CryoSat-2, Sentinel-3 A/B, AltiKa. Our primary objective is to produce an optimal snow product over the recent ‘operational‘ period. This will be complemented by additional snow products covering a longer periods of climate relevance and making use of historical altimeters (Envisat, ICESat-1) and passive microwave radiometers for comparison purposes (SMOS, AMSRE, AMSR-2). In addition to snow thickness, and as a secondary objective, we will explore other snow characteristics (snow density, snow metamorphism, scattering horizon, roughness, etc) and compare these results with in-situ, airborne and other snow on sea ice products including from model studies and reanalysis on drifting sea ice products. In preparation to future multi-frequency mission we will put an emphasis on uncertainty analysis of our snow product, the impact of the snow on the sea ice thickness retrieval, and on climate physics via model runs with snow initialisation and data assimilation. Finally, learning from past and present campaings (i.e. CryoVex, MOSAiC) we will propose methodologies for effective future snow and sea ice thickness airborne validation campaigns via innovative inverse modelling approaches and airborne retrackers.</p><p> </p>

Development and application of NMEFC Arctic Ice-Ocean Prediction System (ArcIOPS) of CHINA

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xi Liang ◽  
Fu Zhao ◽  
Chunhua Li ◽  
Lin Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Prediction System ◽  
Sea Ice Concentration ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
Ice Concentration ◽  
Ocean Prediction ◽  
Arctic Ice

<p>NMEFC provides sea ice services for the CHINARE since 2010, the products in the early stage (before 2017) include satellite-retrieved and numerical forecasts of sea ice concentration. Based on MITgcm and ensemble Kalman Filter data assimilation scheme,  the Arctic Ice-Ocean Prediction System (ArcIOPS v1.0), was established in 2017. ArcIOPS v1.0 assimilates available satellite-retrieved sea ice concentration and thickness data. Sea ice thickness forecasting products from ArcIOPS v1.0 are provided to the CHINARE8, and are believed to have played an important role in the successful passage of R/V XUELONG through the Central Arctic for the first time during the summer of 2017. In 2019, ArcIOPS v1.0 was upgraded to the latest version (ArcIOPS v1.1), which assimilates satellite-retrieved sea ice concentration, sea ice thickness, as well as sea surface temperature (SST) data in ice free areas. Comparison between outputs of the latest version of ArcIOPS and that of its previous version shows that the latest version has a substantial improvement on sea ice concentration forecasts. In the future, with more and more kinds of observations to be assimilated, the high-resolution version of ArcIOPS will be put into operational running and benefit Chinese scientific and commercial activities in the Arctic Ocean.</p>

The implications of selected processing methods on satellite altimetry derived sea ice thickness state and trends in the seasonal ice zone

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isolde Glissenaar ◽  
Jack Landy ◽  
Alek Petty ◽  
Nathan Kurtz ◽  
Julienne Stroeve
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Snow Depth ◽  
Satellite Altimetry ◽  
Region Of Interest ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
Baffin Bay ◽  
The Impact

<p>The ice cover of the Arctic Ocean is increasingly becoming dominated by seasonal sea ice. It is important to focus on the processing of altimetry ice thickness data in thinner seasonal ice regions to understand seasonal sea ice behaviour better. This study focusses on Baffin Bay as a region of interest to study seasonal ice behaviour.</p><p>We aim to reconcile the spring sea ice thickness derived from multiple satellite altimetry sensors and sea ice charts in Baffin Bay and produce a robust long-term record (2003-2020) for analysing trends in sea ice thickness. We investigate the impact of choosing different snow depth products (the Warren climatology, a passive microwave snow depth product and modelled snow depth from reanalysis data) and snow redistribution methods (a sigmoidal function and an empirical piecewise function) to retrieve sea ice thickness from satellite altimetry sea ice freeboard data.</p><p>The choice of snow depth product and redistribution method results in an uncertainty envelope around the March mean sea ice thickness in Baffin Bay of 10%. Moreover, the sea ice thickness trend ranges from -15 cm/dec to 20 cm/dec depending on the applied snow depth product and redistribution method. Previous studies have shown a possible long-term asymmetrical trend in sea ice thinning in Baffin Bay. The present study shows that whether a significant long-term asymmetrical trend was found depends on the choice of snow depth product and redistribution method. The satellite altimetry sea ice thickness results with different snow depth products and snow redistribution methods show that different processing techniques can lead to different results and can influence conclusions on total and spatial sea ice thickness trends. Further processing work on the historic radar altimetry record is needed to create reliable sea ice thickness products in the marginal ice zone.</p>

scholarly journals Near Real Time Arctic sea ice thickness and volume from CryoSat-2

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. L. Tilling ◽  
A. Ridout ◽  
A. Shepherd
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Arctic Sea Ice ◽  
Arctic Climate ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Satellite Orbits ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
Arctic Sea ◽  
Arctic Sea Ice Thickness

Abstract. Timely observations of sea ice thickness help us to understand Arctic climate, and can support maritime activities in the Polar Regions. Although it is possible to calculate Arctic sea ice thickness using measurements acquired by CryoSat-2, the latency of the final release dataset is typically one month, due to the time required to determine precise satellite orbits. We use a new fast delivery CryoSat-2 dataset based on preliminary orbits to compute Arctic sea ice thickness in near real time (NRT), and analyse this data for one sea ice growth season from October 2014 to April 2015. We show that this NRT sea ice thickness product is of comparable accuracy to that produced using the final release CryoSat-2 data, with an average thickness difference of 5 cm, demonstrating that the satellite orbit is not a critical factor in determining sea ice freeboard. In addition, the CryoSat-2 fast delivery product also provides measurements of Arctic sea ice thickness within three days of acquisition by the satellite, and a measurement is delivered, on average, within 10, 7 and 6 km of each location in the Arctic every 2, 14 and 28 days respectively. The CryoSat-2 NRT sea ice thickness dataset provides an additional constraint for seasonal predictions of Arctic climate change, and will allow industries such as tourism and transport to navigate the polar oceans with safety and care.

scholarly journals Satellite-based sea ice thickness changes in the Laptev Sea from 2002 to 2017: comparison to mooring observations

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 2189-2203
Author(s):  
H. Jakob Belter ◽  
Thomas Krumpen ◽  
Stefan Hendricks ◽  
Jens Hoelemann ◽  
Markus A. Janout ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Source Region ◽  
European Space Agency ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Laptev Sea ◽  
Validation Data ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
The Laptev Sea

Abstract. The gridded sea ice thickness (SIT) climate data record (CDR) produced by the European Space Agency (ESA) Sea Ice Climate Change Initiative Phase 2 (CCI-2) is the longest available, Arctic-wide SIT record covering the period from 2002 to 2017. SIT data are based on radar altimetry measurements of sea ice freeboard from the Environmental Satellite (ENVISAT) and CryoSat-2 (CS2). The CCI-2 SIT has previously been validated with in situ observations from drilling, airborne remote sensing, electromagnetic (EM) measurements and upward-looking sonars (ULSs) from multiple ice-covered regions of the Arctic. Here we present the Laptev Sea CCI-2 SIT record from 2002 to 2017 and use newly acquired ULS and upward-looking acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) sea ice draft (VAL) data for validation of the gridded CCI-2 and additional satellite SIT products. The ULS and ADCP time series provide the first long-term satellite SIT validation data set from this important source region of sea ice in the Transpolar Drift. The comparison of VAL sea ice draft data with gridded monthly mean and orbit trajectory CCI-2 data, as well as merged CryoSat-2–SMOS (CS2SMOS) sea ice draft, shows that the agreement between the satellite and VAL draft data strongly depends on the thickness of the sampled ice. Rather than providing mean sea ice draft, the considered satellite products provide modal sea ice draft in the Laptev Sea. Ice drafts thinner than 0.7 m are overestimated, while drafts thicker than approximately 1.3 m are increasingly underestimated by all satellite products investigated for this study. The tendency of the satellite SIT products to better agree with modal sea ice draft and underestimate thicker ice needs to be considered for all past and future investigations into SIT changes in this important region. The performance of the CCI-2 SIT CDR is considered stable over time; however, observed trends in gridded CCI-2 SIT are strongly influenced by the uncertainties of ENVISAT and CS2 and the comparably short investigation period.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document