Journal of critical reviews

10.31838/jcr ◽  
2020 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Critical Reviews

Journal of Technical and Natural Sciences 4(13), 2019/ OEAPS Inc.(Open European Academy of Public Sciences); Chief Editor Vitaly Yakovlev- Berlin, Germany. 26.05.2019: OEAPS Inc., 2019. - 74 P. ISBN: 9781075497858

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inc. OEAPS
Keyword(s):  
Chief Editor ◽  
Natural Sciences ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Original Research ◽  
Research Papers ◽  
European Academy ◽  
Constant Interest ◽  
Critical Reviews

Authoritative and critical reviews of the latest achievements of natural and technical disciplines are published by Journal of Technical and Natural Sciences. Journal of Technical and Natural Sciences, an international peerreviewed journal, publishes both theoretical and experimental highquality documents of constant interest, previously unpublished in journals, in the field of technical and natural sciences, whose purpose is to promote theory and practice. In addition to the peerreviewed original research papers, the Editorial Board welcomes original research reports, modern surveys and communications in a broadly defined field of technical and natural sciences.

Journal of Technical and Natural Sciences 9, 2018/ OEAPS Inc.(Open European Academy of Public Sciences); Chief Editor Vitaly Yakovlev- Berlin, Germany. 18.12.2018: OEAPS Inc., 2019. - 35 P.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inc. OEAPS ◽  
Михаил Владимирович Кармаза ◽  
Роман Владимирович Мотылев ◽  
Вероника Александровна Одрузова ◽  
Нишчхал ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chief Editor ◽  
Natural Sciences ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Original Research ◽  
Research Papers ◽  
High Quality ◽  
European Academy ◽  
Constant Interest ◽  
Critical Reviews

Authoritative and critical reviews of the latest achievements of natural and technical disciplines are published by Journal of Technical and Natural Sciences.Journal of Technical and Natural Sciences, an international peer¬reviewed journal, publishes both theoretical and experimental high¬quality documents of constant interest, previously unpublished in journals, in the field of technical and natural sciences, whose purpose is to promote theory and practice. In addition to the peer¬reviewed original research papers, the Editorial Board welcomes original research reports, modern surveys and communications in a broadly defined field of technical and natural sciences.

Journal of Technical and Natural Sciences 2(11), 2019/ OEAPS Inc.(Open European Academy of Public Sciences); Chief Editor Vitaly Yakovlev- Berlin, Germany. 26.02.2019: OEAPS Inc., 2019. - 87 P.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Саида Адиловна Низамова ◽  
Alina Evgenievna Averina ◽  
Руслан Сергеевич Решетов ◽  
Дмитрий Алексеевич Погожев ◽  
Мария Михайловна Кошелькова ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chief Editor ◽  
Natural Sciences ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Original Research ◽  
Research Papers ◽  
European Academy ◽  
Constant Interest ◽  
Critical Reviews

Authoritative and critical reviews of the latest achievements of natural and technical disciplines are published by Journal of Technical and Natural Sciences. Journal of Technical and Natural Sciences, an international peerreviewed journal, publishes both theoretical and experimental highquality documents of constant interest, previously unpublished in journals, in the field of technical and natural sciences, whose purpose is to promote theory and practice. In addition to the peerreviewed original research papers, the Editorial Board welcomes original research reports, modern surveys and communications in a broadly defined field of technical and natural sciences

scholarly journals 1157. GET IT OUT! Nurses and Clinical Quality Improvement Specialists Drive Initiative to Reduce Standardized Utilization Ratios for Indwelling Urinary Catheters in Hospitalized Patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S413-S414
Author(s):  
Aldo Martinez ◽  
Deborah Parilla ◽  
Melissa Green ◽  
Anne Murphy ◽  
Sylvia Suarez-Ponce ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Night Shift ◽  
Healthcare Research ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Urinary Catheters ◽  
Clinical Quality ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Clinical Quality Improvement ◽  
Critical Reviews

Abstract Background Urinary tract infections (UTIs) account for 34% of all healthcare-associated infections (HAI). Urinary catheters (UC) are placed in 15–25% of hospitalized patients and >75% of HAI UTIs are UC-related. Bacteria introduced via UC can colonize the bladder within 3 days. So, the greatest risk factor for acquiring a catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) is prolonged use of indwelling UC. Nursing (RN) staff noted inconsistency with appropriate use of UC and commonly UC remained in place well after their original indication had expired. Methods As part of a multi-faceted approach for quality improvement and patient safety, we rolled out an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)-based initiative to reduce UC days/Standardized Utilization Ratio (SUR). Daily critical reviews of the indication for UC were conducted by two groups. First, frontline night shift RN staff identified patients who no longer had a valid justification for continued UC. They handed-off the information to day-shift RNs, who recommend removal of UC during daily rounds with the physician teams. A second review was performed by Clinical Quality Improvement Specialists (CQIS) based on defined criteria from our nursing decatheterization protocol. Their discontinue UC recommendations were also sent to the care teams. The critical reviews of UC for CAUTI reduction started with 4 ICUs in August 2018, with additional ICUs added in December, January and March. Monthly UC SURs were tracked Results Figure 1 shows the number of UCs recommended for removal by RNs vs. CQIS (bars), as well as the percent discordance between RNs and CQIS (line). CQIS identified many more removable UCs than the RNs (888 vs. 256). 211 UC were removed after RN recommendations, and an additional 386 UCs were removed as a result of the CQIS audits. Figure 2 shows the marked corresponding decline in our SUR over this intervention. Conclusion As more units participated in the initiative, we saw increasing numbers of “discontinue UC” recommendations. Over time there was also a moderate decrease in the discordance between RN and CQIS recommendations for UC removal. CQIS routinely identified many more UCs to be removed compared with RNs, and more than doubled the number of discontinued UC. Notably, the UC SUR markedly improved, decreasing from 0.98 to 0.78. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

BOOKS Critical reviews

1985 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 336-338
Keyword(s):  
Critical Reviews
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document