scholarly journals Noninvasive Angiographic Results of Clipped or Coiled Intracranial Aneurysms: An Inter- and Intraobserver Reliability Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Benomar ◽  
B. Farzin ◽  
G. Gevry ◽  
W. Boisseau ◽  
D. Roy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intracranial Aneurysms ◽  
Intraobserver Reliability ◽  
Reliability Study

A Novel Technique for the Semi-Automated Measurement of Embryo Volume: An Intraobserver Reliability Study

2010 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 719-725 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shyamaly D. Sur ◽  
Kannamannadiar Jayaprakasan ◽  
Nia W. Jones ◽  
Jeanette Clewes ◽  
Beverley Winter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intraobserver Reliability ◽  
Automated Measurement ◽  
Reliability Study ◽  
Novel Technique

A Reliability Study of the Universal Goniometer, Fluid Goniometer, and Electrogoniometer for the Measurement of Ankle Dorsiflexion

1996 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith Rome ◽  
Fiona Cowieson
Keyword(s):  
Analysis Of Variance ◽  
Clinical Judgment ◽  
Interobserver Reliability ◽  
Full Range ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Ankle Dorsiflexion ◽  
Intraobserver Reliability ◽  
Reliability Study ◽  
Multifactorial Analysis ◽  
Significant Difference

This study investigated the reliability of three goniometers, the universal, fluid, and electro-goniometers, in the measurement of ankle dorsiflexion. Intra- and interobserver reliability were assessed using 10 healthy volunteers and five observers. A standardized ankle position was used to measure full range of active dorsiflexion. Intraobserver reliability was assessed using one observer over two successive occasions. Interobserver reliability was assessed among five observers over five separate occasions. A one-factor analysis of variance to examine intraobserver reliability demonstrated no significant difference between each of the devices on the two occasions. A multifactorial analysis of variance demonstrated significant differences among observers and again among devices ( P < 0.001). Secondary analysis for interdevice reliability demonstrated significant differences among the three devices (p<0.1). The study suggests that each device cannot be used reliably among observers or be used interchangeably, and clinical judgment based on angular changes of less than 10° are invalid if rigid protocols are not followed.

Validity and Reliability Study of the Strength Self-Efficacy Scale

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ran Zhao ◽  
Chia-Lin Tsai ◽  
Adipat Chaichanasakul ◽  
Lisa Y. Flores ◽  
Shane J. Lopez
Keyword(s):  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Reliability Study
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document