scholarly journals Stereotactic radiosurgery versus stereotactic radiotherapy in the management of intracranial meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. E2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nida Fatima ◽  
Antonio Meola ◽  
Erqi L. Pollom ◽  
Scott G. Soltys ◽  
Steven D. Chang
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Stereotactic Radiotherapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Intracranial Meningiomas

OBJECTIVEStereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) have been used as a primary treatment or adjuvant to resection in the management of intracranial meningiomas (ICMs). The aim of this analysis is to compare the safety and long-term efficacy of SRS and SRT in patients with primary or recurrent ICMs.METHODSA systematic review of the literature comparing SRT and SRS in the same study was conducted using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and EMBASE from January 1980 to December 2018. Randomized controlled trials, case-control studies, and cohort studies (prospective and retrospective) analyzing SRS versus SRT for the treatment of ICMs in adult patients (age > 16 years) were included. Pooled and subgroup analyses were based on the fixed-effect model.RESULTSA total of 1736 patients from 12 retrospective studies were included. The treatment modality used was: 1) SRS (n = 306), including Gamma Knife surgery (n = 36), linear accelerator (n = 261), and CyberKnife (n = 9); or 2) SRT (n = 1430), including hypofractionated SRT (hFSRT, n = 268) and full-fractionated SRT (FSRT, n = 1162). The median age of patients at the time of treatment was 59 years. The median follow-up duration after treatment was 35.5 months. The median tumor volumes at the time of treatment with SRS, hFSRT, and FSRT were 2.84 cm3, 5.45 cm3, and 12.75 cm3, respectively. The radiographic tumor control at last follow-up was significantly worse in patients who underwent SRS than SRT (odds ratio [OR] 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27–0.82, p = 0.007) with 7% less volume of tumor shrinkage (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.61–1.40, p = 0.72). Compared to SRS, the radiographic tumor control was better achieved by FSRT (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.26–0.80, p = 0.006) than by hFSRT (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.21–3.17, p = 0.76). Moreover, SRS leads to a significantly higher risk of clinical neurological worsening during follow-up (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.06–4.06, p = 0.03) and of immediate symptomatic edema (OR 4.58, 95% CI 1.67–12.56, p = 0.003) with respect to SRT. SRT could produce a better progression-free survival at 4–10 years compared to SRS, but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.29).CONCLUSIONSSRS and SRT are both safe options in the management of ICMs. However, SRT carries a better radiographic tumor control rate and a lower incidence of posttreatment symptomatic worsening and symptomatic edema, with respect to SRS. However, further prospective studies are still needed to validate these results.

scholarly journals Stereotactic Radiosurgery Versus Stereotactic Radiotherapy in the Management of Intracranial Meningiomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nida Fatima ◽  
Antonio Meola ◽  
Erqi Pollom ◽  
Scott G Soltys ◽  
Steven D Chang
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Mesh Terms ◽  
Hypofractionated Radiation

Abstract INTRODUCTION The aim of this analysis is to compare the safety and long-term efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and SRT in patients with primary or recurrent ICMs. METHODS A systematic review was carried out using different MeSH terms from the electronic database. Randomized controlled trials, case-control studies, and cohort studies (prospective and retrospective) analyzing SRS vs SRT for the treatment of ICMs in adult patients (age > 16 yr old) were included. RESULTS A total of 1736 patients from 12 retrospective studies were included. The treatment modality was SRS (n = 306) including Gamma Knife (GKS) (n = 36), LINAC (n = 261), and CyberKnife (n = 9), or SRT (n = 1430) including hypofractionated radiation therapy (hFSRT) (n = 268) and full-fractionated radiation therapy (FSRT) (n = 1162). The median age of patients at the time of treatment was 59 yr. The median follow-up after treatment was 35.5 mo. The median tumor volume at the time of treatment with SRS, hFSRT, and FSRT was, respectively, 2.84 cm3, 5.45 cm3, and 12.75 cm3. The radiographic tumor control at last follow-up was significantly worse in patients who underwent SRS than SRT [OR: 0.47: 95% CI 0.27-0.82, P = .007] with 7% less volume of tumor shrinkage [OR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.61-1.40; P = .72]. Compared to SRS, the radiographic tumor control was better achieved by FSRT [OR: 0.46: 95% CI 0.26-0.80, P = .006] than by hFSRT [OR: 0.81: 95% CI 0.21-3.17; P = .76]. Moreover, SRS leads to a significantly higher risk of clinical neurological worsening during follow-up [OR: 2.07: 95% CI: 1.06-4.06; P = .03], and of immediate symptomatic edema [OR: 4.58: 95% CI: 1.67-12.56; P = .003] with respect to SRT. SRT could carry a better progression-free survival (PFS) at 4 to 10 yr compared to SRS, yet not statistically significant (P = .29). CONCLUSION SRS and SRT are both safe options in the management of ICMs However, SRT carries a better radiographic tumor control rate, lower incidence of post-treatment symptomatic worsening and symptomatic edema, with respect to SRS.

scholarly journals Primary Treatment of Small-To-Medium (<3cm) Sporadic Vestibular Schwannomas: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis on Long-Term Hearing Preservation And Tumor Control Rates For Microsurgery Versus Radiosurgery.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amey Rajan Savardekar ◽  
Danielle L Terrell ◽  
Saudamini Jayant Lele ◽  
Ryan Robert Diaz ◽  
Praneeth Reddy Keesari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Hearing Preservation ◽  
Primary Treatment ◽  
Vestibular Schwannomas ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Group 10

Abstract BackgroundOver the past two decades, the treatment of small-to-medium (<3cm) sporadic vestibular schwannomas (VS) has experienced a definite shift to stereotactic radiosurgery vis-a-vis microsurgery. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of VS patients primarily treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or microsurgery (MS), with particular attention to hearing preservation outcomes (HPO), tumor control (TC), and facial nerve dysfunction (FND).MethodsA systematic review was conducted (Medline and Scopus database) for the period, January 2010 to June 2020 with appropriate MeSH. English language articles for small-to-medium sporadic VS (<3cm) utilizing SRS or MS as treatment modality, with minimum follow-up of 3 years, were included. Studies had to report an acceptable standardized hearing metric. HPO, TC, and FND rates were analyzed. ResultsThirty-two studies met inclusion criteria: 10 for microsurgery; 23 for radiosurgery (one comparative study included in both). HPO, at ~65 months follow-up, were comparable between MS group (10 studies; 809 patients) and SRS group (23 studies; 1234 patients) (56% versus 59%, p=0.1527). TC, at ~70 months follow-up, was significantly better in MS group (9 studies; 1635 patients) versus SRS group (19 studies; 2260 patients) (98% versus 92%, p < 0.0001). FND, at ~ 12 months follow-up, was significantly higher in MS group (8 studies; 1101 patients) versus SRS group (17 studies; 2285 patients) (10% versus 2%, p < 0.0001).ConclusionMS and SRS are comparable primary treatment options for small (<3cm) sporadic VS with respect to HPO at 5-year follow-up in patients with serviceable hearing at presentation. Approximately 50% patients for both modalities will likely lose serviceable hearing by that time-point. High TC rates (>90%) were seen with both modalities, with MS (98%) significantly better than SRS (92%). The post-treatment FND was significantly less with SRS group (2%) versus MS group (10%).

Comparing Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Treating patients with Growth Hormone-Secreting Adenomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiulin Zheng ◽  
Yinqiong Huang ◽  
Wei Lin ◽  
Liangchun Cai ◽  
Junping Wen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Pituitary Adenoma ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Stereotactic Radiotherapy ◽  
Remission Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Biochemical Remission

Context: Radiotherapy for patients with acromegaly was considered when patients have residual disease or tumor recurrence after surgery, or when surgery can’t be carried out. There are two main modes of radiotherapy, including stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT). Objective: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to present the effectiveness and safety of SRS and FSRT for GH secreting pituitary adenoma in clinical practice. Methods: We searched the published literature using following databases: Pub Med, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and EMBASE up to March 22, 2020, for studies in which SRS or FSRT were used in patients with GH secreting pituitary. Results: A total of 33 studies were eligible, involving 2016 participants. No significant differences were observed in tumor shrinkage rate, local tumor control rate and adverse effect rate between SRS and FSRT. Compared to FSRT, SRS showed significant increase in biochemical remission rate (43% vs. 28%; p=0.023) and significant lower follow-up GH level (SMD: −1.20 vs. −0.37, p=0.006). Conclusions: SRS and FSRT showed comparable effectiveness and safety in the management of GH secreting pituitary adenoma patients. SRS might be associated with better biochemical remission.

scholarly journals Systematic review and meta-analysis of the technique of subtotal resection and stereotactic radiosurgery for large vestibular schwannomas: a “nerve-centered” approach

2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. E4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Starnoni ◽  
Roy Thomas Daniel ◽  
Constantin Tuleasca ◽  
Mercy George ◽  
Marc Levivier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Subtotal Resection ◽  
Combined Approach ◽  
Nerve Preservation ◽  
Large Vestibular Schwannoma

OBJECTIVEDuring the last decade, the primary objective for large vestibular schwannoma (VS) management has progressively shifted, from tumor excision to nerve preservation by using a combined microsurgical and radiosurgical approach. The aim of this study was to provide a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature regarding the combined strategy of subtotal resection (STR) followed by stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for large VSs.METHODSThe authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis in compliance with the PRISMA guidelines for article identification and inclusion using the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Established inclusion criteria were used to screen all identified relevant articles published before September 2017 without backward date limit.RESULTSThe authors included 9 studies (248 patients). With a weighted mean follow-up of 46 months (range 28–68.8 months), the pooled rate of overall tumor control was 93.9% (95% CI 91.0%–96.8%). Salvage treatment (second STR and/or SRS) was necessary in only 13 (5.24%) of 18 patients who experienced initial treatment failure. According to the House-Brackmann (HB) grading scale, functional facial nerve preservation (HB grade I–II) was achieved in 96.1% of patients (95% CI 93.7%–98.5%). Serviceable hearing after the combined approach was preserved in 59.9% (95% CI 36.5%–83.2%).CONCLUSIONSA combined approach of STR followed by SRS was shown to have excellent clinical and functional outcomes while still achieving a tumor control rate comparable to that obtained with a total resection. Longer-term follow-up and larger patient cohorts are necessary to fully evaluate the rate of tumor control achieved with this approach.

scholarly journals Daily sodium consumption and CVD mortality in the general population: systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies

2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 695-704 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosana Poggio ◽  
Laura Gutierrez ◽  
María G Matta ◽  
Natalia Elorriaga ◽  
Vilma Irazola ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Relative Risk ◽  
General Population ◽  
Prospective Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Random Effects Models ◽  
Meta Regression ◽  
Cvd Mortality

AbstractObjectiveThe purpose of the present study was to determine whether elevated dietary Na intake could be associated with CVD mortality.DesignWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies representing the general population. The adjusted relative risks and their 95 % confidence intervals were pooled by the inverse variance method using random-effects models. Heterogeneity, publication bias, subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed.SettingsMEDLINE (since 1973), Embase (since 1975), the Cochrane Library (since 1976), ISI Web of Science, Google Scholar (until September 2013) and secondary referencing were searched for inclusion in the study.SubjectEleven prospective studies with 229 785 participants and average follow-up period of 13·37 years (range 5·5–19 years).ResultsHigher Na intake was significantly associated with higher CVD mortality (relative risk=1·12; 95 % CI 1·06, 1·19). In the sensitivity analysis, the exclusion of studies with important relative weights did not significantly affect the results (relative risk=1·08; 95 % CI 1·01, 1·15). The meta-regression analysis showed that for every increase of 10 mmol/d in Na intake, CVD mortality increased significantly by 1 % (P=0·016). Age, hypertensive status and length of follow-up were also associated with increased CVD mortality.ConclusionsHigher Na intake was associated with higher CVD mortality in the general population; this result suggests a reduction in Na intake to prevent CVD mortality from any cause.

Recurrence Rate of Sporadic Pheochromocytomas After Curative Adrenalectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabelle Holscher ◽  
Tijs J van den Berg ◽  
Koen M A Dreijerink ◽  
Anton F Engelsman ◽  
Els J M Nieveen van Dijkum
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Weighted Mean ◽  
Curative Surgery ◽  
Endocrine Society ◽  
Time To Recurrence ◽  
The Cochrane Library

Abstract Background Evidence on follow-up duration for patients with sporadic pheochromocytomas is absent, and current guidelines of the European Society of Endocrinology, American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and Endocrine Surgeons, and the Endocrine Society are ambiguous about the appropriate duration of follow-up. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the recurrence rate of sporadic pheochromocytomas after curative adrenalectomy. Materials and Methods A literature search in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed. A study was eligible if it included a clear report on the number of sporadic patients, recurrence rate, and follow-up duration. Studies with an inclusion period before 1990, &lt;2 years of follow-up, &lt;10 patients, and unclear data on the sporadic nature of pheochromocytomas were excluded. A meta-analysis on recurrence was performed provided that the heterogeneity was low (I2 &lt; 25%) or intermediate (I2 26–75%). Hozo’s method was used to calculate weighted mean follow-up duration and weighted time to recurrence with combined standard deviations (SDs). Results A total of 13 studies, including 430 patients, were included in the synthesis. The meta-analysis results describe a pooled recurrence rate after curative surgery of 3% (95% confidence interval: 2–6%, I2 = 0%), with a weighted mean time to recurrence of 49.4 months (SD = 30.7) and a weighted mean follow-up period of 77.3 months (SD = 32.2). Conclusions This meta-analysis shows a very low recurrence rate of 3%. Prospective studies, including economical and health effects of limited follow-up strategies for patients with truly sporadic pheochromocytomas should be considered.

scholarly journals Treatment of Residual, Recurrent, or Metastatic Intracranial Hemangiopericytomas With Stereotactic Radiotherapy Using CyberKnife

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lichao Huang ◽  
Jingmin Bai ◽  
Yanyang Zhang ◽  
Zhiqiang Cui ◽  
Zhizhong Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stereotactic Radiotherapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Grade ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Intracranial Metastasis ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Aggressive Tumors

PurposeHemangiopericytomas are aggressive tumors known for their recurrence. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the management of residual, recurrent, and metastatic intracranial hemangiopericytomas using CyberKnife (CK) stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT).Materials and MethodsData were collected from 15 patients (28 tumors; eight men and seven women; 32–58 years) with residual, recurrent, or metastatic intracranial hemangiopericytomas, who were treated with stereotactic radiotherapy using CyberKnife between January 2014 and August 2019. All patients had previously been treated with surgical resection. Initial tumor volumes ranged from 0.84 to 67.2 cm3, with a mean volume of 13.06 cm3. The mean marginal and maximum radiosurgical doses to the tumors were 21.1 and 28.76 Gy, respectively. The mean follow-up time for tumors was 34.5 months, ranging from 13 to 77 months.Results15 patients were alive after treatment; the mean post-diagnosis survival at censoring was 45.6 months (range 13–77 months). The volumes of the 28 tumors in the 15 followed patients were calculated after treatment. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging revealed a mean tumor volume of 6.72 cm3 and a range of 0–67.2 cm3, with the volumes being significantly lower than pretreatment values. Follow-up imaging studies demonstrated tumor disappearance in seven (25%) of 28 tumors, reduction in 14 (50%), stability in one (3.57%), and recurrence in six (21.4%). Total tumor control was achieved in 22 (78.5%) of 28 tumors. The tumor grade and fraction time were not significantly associated with progression-free survival. Intracranial metastasis occurred in three patients, and extraneural metastasis in one patient.ConclusionsOn the basis of the current results, stereotactic radiotherapy using CyberKnife is an effective and safe option for residual, recurrent, and metastatic intracranial hemangiopericytomas. Long-term close clinical and imaging follow-up is also necessary.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of acute geriatric unit care on functional decline and process outcomes among older adults admitted to hospital with acute medical complaints: a protocol for a systematic review

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. e050524
Author(s):  
Íde O’Shaughnessy ◽  
Katie Robinson ◽  
Margaret O'Connor ◽  
Mairéad Conneely ◽  
Damien Ryan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Functional Decline ◽  
Index Admission ◽  
Research Centre ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Process Outcomes

IntroductionOlder adults are clinically heterogeneous and are at increased risk of adverse outcomes during hospitalisation due to the presence of multiple comorbid conditions and reduced homoeostatic reserves. Acute geriatric units (AGUs) are units designed with their own physical location and structure, which provide care to older adults during the acute phase of illness and are underpinned by an interdisciplinary comprehensive geriatric assessment model of care. This review aims to update and synthesise the totality of evidence related to the effectiveness of AGU care on clinical and process outcomes among older adults admitted to hospital with acute medical complaints.DesignUpdated systematic review and meta-analysisMethods and analysisMEDLINE, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Controlled Trials in the Cochrane Library and Embase electronic databases will be systematically searched from 2008 to February 2021. Trials with a randomised design that deliver an AGU intervention to older adults admitted to hospital for acute medical complaints will be included. The primary outcome measure will be functional decline at discharge from hospital and at follow-up. Secondary outcomes will include length of stay, cost of index admission, incidence of unscheduled hospital readmission, living at home (the inverse of death or institutionalisation combined; used to describe someone who is in their own home at follow‐up), mortality, cognitive function and patient satisfaction with index admission. Title and abstract screening of studies for full-text extraction will be conducted independently by two authors. The Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool will be used to assess the methodological quality of the included trials. The quality of evidence for outcomes reported will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework. A pooled meta-analysis will be conducted using Review Manager, depending on the uniformity of the data.Ethics and disseminationFormal ethical approval is not required as all data collected will be secondary data and will be analysed anonymously. The authors will present the findings of the review to a patient and public involvement stakeholder panel of older adults that has been established at the Ageing Research Centre in the University of Limerick. This will enable the views and opinions of older adults to be integrated into the discussion section of the paper.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021237633.

Intralesional steroids and endoscopic dilation for anastomotic strictures after esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis

Endoscopy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (09) ◽  
pp. 721-726
Author(s):  
Chandra S. Dasari ◽  
Ramprasad Jegadeesan ◽  
Harsh K. Patel ◽  
Madhav Desai ◽  
Muhammad Aziz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Placebo Group ◽  
Steroid Injection ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Endoscopic Dilation ◽  
Steroid Group ◽  
Anastomotic Strictures ◽  
Local Steroid Injection

Abstract Background Post-esophagectomy anastomotic strictures are difficult to treat. The impact of adding local steroid injection to endoscopic dilation for the treatment of post-esophagectomy anastomotic strictures is unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of performing steroid injection in addition to dilation. Methods A search was conducted in MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science from inception to January 2019. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of endoscopic dilation plus either local steroid injection (steroid group) or saline injection (placebo group) were included in the analysis. Results Three RCTs were eligible for the final analysis: 72 patients (mean age 61.3 years, 74 % male) in the steroid group and 72 patients (mean age 59.6 years, 71 % male) in the placebo group. The mean number of dilations required to resolve the stricture was significantly lower in the steroid group compared with the placebo group, with a mean weighted difference of –1.62 (95 % confidence interval [CI] –2.73 to –0.50; P = 0.004). After 6 months of follow-up, there was a trend toward more patients in the steroid group remaining dysphagia free compared with the placebo group, with a pooled odds ratio of 2.36 (95 %CI 0.94 to 5.91; P = 0.07, I2  = 24 %). Conclusion This meta-analysis showed that the addition of local steroid injection at the time of dilation for benign anastomotic strictures led to a significant decrease in the number of procedures required to resolve the stricture and may well reduce dysphagia symptoms during follow-up.

scholarly journals Incidence and trend of preterm birth in China, 1990–2016: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. e039303
Author(s):  
Shiwen Jing ◽  
Chang Chen ◽  
Yuexin Gan ◽  
Joshua Vogel ◽  
Jun Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Preterm Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Northwest China ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Rate Of Increase ◽  
Preterm Birth Rate

ObjectivesTo update the WHO estimate of preterm birth rate in China in 1990–2016 and to further explore variations by geographic regions and years of occurrence.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.Data sourcesPubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Sinomed databases were searched from 1990 to 2018.Eligibility criteriaStudies were included if they provided preterm birth data with at least 500 total births. Reviews, case–control studies, intervention studies and studies with insufficient information or published before 1990 were excluded. We estimated pooled incidence of preterm birth by a random effects model, and preterm birth rate in different year, region and by livebirths or all births in subgroup analyses.ResultsOur search identified 3945 records. After the removal of duplicates and screening of titles and abstracts, we reviewed 254 studies in full text and excluded 182, leaving 72 new studies. They were combined with the 82 studies included in the WHO report (154 studies, 187 data sets in total for the meta-analysis), including 24 039 084 births from 1990 to 2016. The pooled incidence of preterm birth in China was 6.09% (95% CI 5.86% to 6.31%) but has been steadily increasing from 5.36% (95% CI 4.89% to 5.84%) in 1990–1994 to 7.04% (95% CI 6.09% to 7.99%) in 2015–2016. The annual rate of increase was about 1.05% (95% CI 0.85% to 1.21%). Northwest China appeared to have the highest preterm birth rate (7.3%, 95% CI 4.92% to 9.68% from 1990 to 2016).ConclusionsThe incidence of preterm birth in China has been rising gradually in the past three decades. It was 7% in 2016. Preterm birth rate varied by region with the West having the highest occurrence.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document