scholarly journals Blast-induced traumatic brain injury: the experience from a level I trauma center in southern Thailand

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. E7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thara Tunthanathip ◽  
Kanutpon Khocharoen ◽  
Nakornchai Phuenpathom
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Blast Injury ◽  
Unfavorable Outcome ◽  
Common Finding ◽  
Common Mechanism ◽  
Forest Plot ◽  
Midline Shift ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Southern Thailand

OBJECTIVEIn the ongoing conflict in southern Thailand, the improvised explosive device (IED) has been a common cause of blast-induced traumatic brain injury (bTBI). The authors investigated the particular characteristics of bTBI and the factors associated with its clinical outcome.METHODSA retrospective cohort study was conducted on all patients who had sustained bTBI between 2009 and 2017. Collected data included clinical characteristics, intracranial injuries, and outcomes. Factors analysis was conducted using a forest plot.RESULTSDuring the study period, 70 patients met the inclusion criteria. Fifty individuals (71.4%) were military personnel. One-third of the patients (32.9%) suffered moderate to severe bTBI, and the rate of intracerebral injuries on brain CT was 65.7%. Coup contusion was the most common finding, and primary blast injury was the most common mechanism of blast injury. Seventeen individuals had an unfavorable outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale score 1–3), and the overall mortality rate for bTBI was 11.4%. In the univariate analysis, factors associated with an unfavorable outcome were preoperative coagulopathy, midline shift of the brain ≥ 5 mm, basal cistern effacement, moderate to severe TBI, hypotension, fixed and dilated pupils, surgical site infection, hematocrit < 30% on admission, coup contusion, and subdural hematoma. In the multivariable analysis, midline shift ≥ 5 mm (OR 29.1, 95% CI 2.5–328.1) and coagulopathy (OR 28.7, 95% CI 4.5–180.3) were the only factors predicting a poor outcome of bTBI.CONCLUSIONSbTBIs range from mild to severe. Midline shift and coagulopathy are treatable factors associated with an unfavorable outcome. Hence, in cases of bTBI, reversing an abnormal coagulogram is required as soon as possible to improve clinical outcomes. The management of brain shift needs further study.

Long-term outcome in traumatic brain injury patients with midline shift: a secondary analysis of the Phase 3 COBRIT clinical trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 131 (2) ◽  
pp. 596-603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ross C. Puffer ◽  
John K. Yue ◽  
Matthew Mesley ◽  
Julia B. Billigen ◽  
Jane Sharpless ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Unfavorable Outcome ◽  
Favorable Outcome ◽  
Midline Shift ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Recovery Trajectory

OBJECTIVEFollowing traumatic brain injury (TBI), midline shift of the brain at the level of the septum pellucidum is often caused by unilateral space-occupying lesions and is associated with increased intracranial pressure and worsened morbidity and mortality. While outcome has been studied in this population, the recovery trajectory has not been reported in a large cohort of patients with TBI. The authors sought to utilize the Citicoline Brain Injury Treatment (COBRIT) trial to analyze patient recovery over time depending on degree of midline shift at presentation.METHODSPatient data from the COBRIT trial were stratified into 4 groups of midline shift, and outcome measures were analyzed at 30, 90, and 180 days postinjury. A recovery trajectory analysis was performed identifying patients with outcome measures at all 3 time points to analyze the degree of recovery based on midline shift at presentation.RESULTSThere were 892, 1169, and 895 patients with adequate outcome data at 30, 90, and 180 days, respectively. Rates of favorable outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale–Extended [GOS-E] scores 4–8) at 6 months postinjury were 87% for patients with no midline shift, 79% for patients with 1–5 mm of shift, 64% for patients with 6–10 mm of shift, and 47% for patients with > 10 mm of shift. The mean improvement from unfavorable outcome (GOS-E scores 2 and 3) to favorable outcome (GOS-E scores 4–8) from 1 month to 6 months in all groups was 20% (range 4%–29%). The mean GOS-E score for patients in the 6- to 10-mm group crossed from unfavorable outcome (GOS-E scores 2 and 3) into favorable outcome (GOS-E scores 4–8) at 90 days, and the mean GOS-E of patients in the > 10-mm group nearly reached the threshold of favorable outcome by 180 days postinjury.CONCLUSIONSIn this secondary analysis of the Phase 3 COBRIT trial, TBI patients with less than 10 mm of midline shift on admission head CT had significantly improved functional outcomes through 180 days after injury compared with those with greater than 10 mm of midline shift. Of note, nearly 50% of patients with > 10 mm of midline shift achieved a favorable outcome (GOS-E score 4–8) by 6 months postinjury.

Partial hypopituitarism: a common finding after traumatic brain injury

2003 ◽  
Vol 111 (06) ◽  
Author(s):  
HJ Schneider ◽  
M Schneider ◽  
F von Rosen ◽  
M Uhr ◽  
B Saller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Common Finding

Machine Learning for Prediction of Mortality and Unfavorable Outcome in Traumatic Brain Injury: A CENTER-TBI Study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Gravesteijn ◽  
Daan Nieboer ◽  
Ari Ercole ◽  
Hester F. Lingsma ◽  
David Nelson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Unfavorable Outcome ◽  
Prediction Of Mortality

scholarly journals Outcome Prediction in Patients of Traumatic Brain Injury Based on Midline Shift on CT Scan of Brain

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shrikant Govindrao Palekar ◽  
Manish Jaiswal ◽  
Mandar Patil ◽  
Vijay Malpathak
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Head Injury ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Treatment Protocol ◽  
Emergency Setting ◽  
Midline Shift ◽  
Ct Head ◽  
Clinical Tools ◽  
Gcs Score

Abstract Background Clinicians treating patients with head injury often take decisions based on their assessment of prognosis. Assessment of prognosis could help communication with a patient and the family. One of the most widely used clinical tools for such prediction is the Glasgow coma scale (GCS); however, the tool has a limitation with regard to its use in patients who are under sedation, are intubated, or under the influence of alcohol or psychoactive drugs. CT scan findings such as status of basal cistern, midline shift, associated traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), and intraventricular hemorrhage are useful indicators in predicting outcome and also considered as valid options for prognostication of the patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), especially in emergency setting. Materials and Methods 108 patients of head injury were assessed at admission with clinical examination, history, and CT scan of brain. CT findings were classified according to type of lesion and midline shift correlated to GCS score at admission. All the subjects in this study were managed with an identical treatment protocol. Outcome of these patients were assessed on GCS score at discharge. Result Among patients with severe GCS, 51% had midline shift. The degree of midline shift in CT head was a statistically significant determinant of outcome (p = 0.023). Seventeen out of 48 patients (35.4%) with midline shift had poor outcome as compared with 8 out of 60 patients (13.3%) with no midline shift. Conclusion In patients with TBI, the degree of midline shift on CT scan was significantly related to the severity of head injury and resulted in poor clinical outcome.

scholarly journals Allocation of funding into blast injury-related research and blast traumatic brain injury between 2000 and 2019: analysis of global investments from public and philanthropic funders

2020 ◽  
pp. bmjmilitary-2020-001655
Author(s):  
J W Denny ◽  
R J Brown ◽  
M G Head ◽  
J Batchelor ◽  
A S Dickinson
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Open Data ◽  
Blast Injury ◽  
Included Study ◽  
Related Research ◽  
Blast Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Research Investment ◽  
Ear Injury ◽  
Injury Research

IntroductionThere is little systematic tracking or detailed analysis of investments in research and development for blast injury to support decision-making around research future funding.MethodsThis study examined global investments into blast injury-related research from public and philanthropic funders across 2000–2019. Research databases were searched using keywords, and open data were extracted from funder websites. Data collected included study title, abstract, award amount, funder and year. Individual awards were categorised to compare amounts invested into different blast injuries, the scientific approaches taken and analysis of research investment into blast traumatic brain injury (TBI).ResultsA total of 806 awards were identified into blast injury-related research globally, equating to US$902.1 million (m, £565.9m GBP). There was a general increase in year-on-year investment between 2003 and 2009 followed by a consistent decline in annual funding since 2010. Pre-clinical research received $671.3 m (74.4%) of investment. Brain-related injury research received $427.7 m (47.4%), orthopaedic injury $138.6 m (15.4%), eye injury $63.7 m (7.0%) and ear injury $60.5m (6.7%). Blast TBI research received a total investment of $384.3 m, representing 42.6% of all blast injury-related research. The U.S. Department of Defense funded $719.3 m (80%).ConclusionsInvestment data suggest that blast TBI research has received greater funding than other blast injury health areas. The funding pattern observed can be seen as reactive, driven by the response to the War on Terror, the rising profile of blast TBI and congressionally mandated research.

scholarly journals Intracranial Pressure during External Ventricular Drainage Weaning Is an Outcome Predictor of Traumatic Brain Injury

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Jia-cheng Gu ◽  
Hong Wu ◽  
Xing-zhao Chen ◽  
Jun-feng Feng ◽  
Guo-yi Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Intracranial Pressure ◽  
External Ventricular Drainage ◽  
Unfavorable Outcome ◽  
Ventricular Drainage ◽  
Outcome Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Relationship

External ventricular drainage (EVD) is widely used in patients with a traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, the EVD weaning trial protocol varies and insufficient studies focus on the intracranial pressure (ICP) during the weaning trial. We aimed to establish the relationship between ICP during an EVD weaning trial and the outcomes of TBI. We enrolled 37 patients with a TBI with an EVD from July 2018 to September 2019. Among them, 26 were allocated to the favorable outcome group and 11 to the unfavorable outcome group (death, post-traumatic hydrocephalus, persistent vegetative state, and severe disability). Groups were well matched for sex, pupil reactivity, admission Glasgow Coma Scale score, Marshall computed tomography score, modified Fisher score, intraventricular hemorrhage, EVD days, cerebrospinal fluid output before the weaning trial, and the complications. Before and during the weaning trial, we recorded the ICP at 1-hour intervals to calculate the mean ICP, delta ICP, and ICP burden, which was defined as the area under the ICP curve. There were significant between-group differences in the age, surgery types, and intensive care unit days (p=0.045, p=0.028, and p=0.004, respectively). During the weaning trial, 28 (75.7%) patients had an increased ICP. Although there was no significant difference in the mean ICP before and during the weaning trial, the delta ICP was higher in the unfavorable outcome group (p=0.001). Moreover, patients who experienced death and hydrocephalus had a higher ICP burden, which was above 20 mmHg (p=0.016). Receiver operating characteristic analyses demonstrated the predictive ability of these variables (area under the curve AUC=0.818 [p=0.002] for delta ICP and AUC=0.758 [p=0.038] for ICP burden>20 mmHg). ICP elevation is common during EVD weaning trials in patients with TBI. ICP-related parameters, including delta ICP and ICP burden, are significant outcome predictors. There is a need for larger prospective studies to further explore the relationship between ICP during EVD weaning trials and TBI outcomes.

scholarly journals Prehospital Factors Associated with Discharge Outcomes: Baseline Data from the Andhra Pradesh Traumatic Brain Injury Project

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 100020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kodanda Ram ◽  
Kadali VaraPrasad ◽  
Murali K. Krishna ◽  
Nithya Kannan ◽  
Venkataraman Sundar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Andhra Pradesh ◽  
Baseline Data ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Discharge Outcomes

Risk factors associated with sleep disturbance following traumatic brain injury

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. e109
Author(s):  
Y. Dong ◽  
P. Sheng ◽  
W. Tong ◽  
Z. Li ◽  
D. Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Sleep Disturbance ◽  
Factors Associated
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document