Medical and surgical management of spinal epidural abscess: a systematic review

2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. E4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leopold Arko ◽  
Eric Quach ◽  
Vincent Nguyen ◽  
Daniel Chang ◽  
Vishad Sukul ◽  
...  

Object Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a rare condition that has previously been treated with urgent surgical decompression and antibiotics. Recent availability of MRI makes early diagnosis possible and allows for the nonoperative treatment of SEA in select patients. The first retrospective review of medically and surgically managed SEA was published in 1999, and since that time several other retrospective institutional reports have been published. This study reviews these published reports and compares pooled data with historical treatment data. Methods A PubMed keyword and Boolean search using (“spinal epidural abscess” OR “spinal epidural abscesses” AND [management OR treatment]) returned 429 results. Filters for the English language and publications after 1999 were applied, as the first study comparing operative and nonoperative management was published that year. Articles comparing operative to nonoperative treatment strategies for SEA were identified, and the references were further reviewed for additional articles. Studies involving at least 10 adult patients (older than 18 years) were included. Case reports, studies reporting either medical or surgical management only, studies not reporting indications for conservative management, or studies examining SEA as a result of a specific pathogen were excluded. Results Twelve articles directly comparing surgical to nonsurgical management of SEA were obtained. These articles reported on a total of 1099 patients. The average age of treated patients was 57.24 years, and 62.5% of treated patients were male. The most common pathogens found in blood and wound cultures were Staphylococcus aureus (63.6%) and Streptococcus species (6.8%). The initial treatment was surgery in 59.7% of cases and medical therapy in 40.3%. This represented a significant increase in the proportion of medically managed patients in comparison with the historical control prior to 1999 (p < 0.05). Patients with no neurological deficits were significantly more likely to be treated medically than surgically (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference overall between surgical and nonsurgical management, although several risk factors may predict failure of medical management. Conclusions . Since the first reports of nonoperative treatment of SEA, there has been a substantial trend toward treating neurologically intact patients with medical management. Nevertheless, medical therapy fails in a fair number of cases involving patients with specific risk factors, and patients with these risk factors should be closely observed in consideration for surgery. Further research may help identify patients at greater risk for failure of medical therapy.

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Stratton ◽  
Karla Gustafson ◽  
Kenneth Thomas ◽  
Matthew T. James

OBJECTIVE Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a life-threatening infection. It is uncertain whether medical versus surgical treatment is the ideal initial approach for neurologically intact patients with SEA. Recent evidence demonstrates that initial medical management is increasingly common; however, patients who ultimately require surgery after failed medical management may have a worse prognosis than those whose treatment was initially surgical. The primary objective of this study was to establish the current incidence of failed medical management for SEA. The secondary aim was to identify risk factors associated with the failure of medical management. METHODS The authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis by searching electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PubMed), recent conference proceedings, and reference lists of relevant articles. Studies that reported original data on consecutive adult patients with SEA treated medically were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria, which included a total of 489 medically treated patients with SEA. Agreement on articles for study inclusion was very high between the reviewers (kappa 0.86). In a meta-analysis, the overall pooled risk of failed medical management was 29.3% (95% CI 21.4%–37.2%) and when medical to surgical crossover was used to define failure the rate was 26.3% (95% CI 13.0%–39.7%). Only 6 studies provided data for analysis by intended treatment, with a pooled estimate of 35.1% (95% CI 15.7%–54.4%) of failed medical management. Two studies reported predictors of the failure of medical management. CONCLUSIONS Although the incidence of failed medical management of SEA was relatively common in published reports, estimates were highly heterogeneous between studies, thus introducing uncertainty about the frequency of this risk. A consensus definition of failure is required to facilitate comparison of failure rates across studies.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. e235320
Author(s):  
Antoine Altdorfer ◽  
Pierre Gavage ◽  
Filip Moerman

A 76-year-old woman with a rare case of spinal epidural abscess (SEA) that had no risk factors for such type of infection, presented symptoms of back pain, progressive neurological deficit of the lower limb and loss of sphincter control. A gadolinium-enhanced MRI confirmed the diagnosis of an SEA. The patient underwent laminectomy with surgical drainage, where cultures showed the presence of Aggregatibacter aphrophilus, a bacterium of the HACEK group (Haemophilus species, Aggregatibacter species, Cardiobacterium hominis, Eikenella corrodens, and Kingella species), rarely involved in SEA. Following surgery, the patient was treated with intravenous ceftriaxone for 6 weeks, and this gave excellent results.


2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 250-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael D Parkins ◽  
Daniel B Gregson

Serratia marcescenshas rarely been reported as an agent of invasive disease in patients presenting from the community. Furthermore,S marcescensis frequently opportunistic, affecting individuals with serious medical comorbidities including immune suppression and diabetes. A case of a community-acquiredS marcescensspontaneous lumbar epidural abscess presenting as cauda equina syndrome is reported in a previously well 36-year-old man with no identifiable risk factors. To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first report of invasiveS marcescenscausing disease in a patient with no medical comorbidities.


2009 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 7S
Author(s):  
Isaac Karikari ◽  
Ciaran Powers ◽  
Renee Reynolds ◽  
Ankit Mehta ◽  
Robert Isaacs

2004 ◽  
Vol 164 (22) ◽  
pp. 2409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farhan Siddiq ◽  
Ashish Chowfin ◽  
Robert Tight ◽  
Abe E. Sahmoun ◽  
Raymond A. Smego

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 204993611986394
Author(s):  
Anastasia Turner ◽  
Linlu Zhao ◽  
Paul Gauthier ◽  
Suzan Chen ◽  
Darren M. Roffey ◽  
...  

Background: Cervical spinal epidural abscess (CSEA) is a localized infection between the thecal sac and cervical spinal column which may result in neurological deficit and death if inadequately treated. Two treatment options exist: medical management and surgical intervention. Our objective was to analyze CSEA patient outcomes in order to determine the optimal method of treatment. Methods: An electronic literature search for relevant case series and retrospective reviews was conducted through June 2016. Data abstraction and study quality assessment were performed by two independent reviewers. A lack of available data led to a post hoc decision not to perform meta-analysis of the results; study findings were synthesized qualitatively. Results: 927 studies were identified, of which 11 were included. Four studies were ranked as good quality, and seven ranked as fair quality. In total, data from 173 patients were included. Mean age was 55 years; 61.3% were male. Intravenous drug use was the most common risk factor for CSEA development. Staphylococcus aureus was the most commonly cultured pathogen. 140 patients underwent initial surgery, an additional 18 patients were surgically treated upon failure of medical management, and 15 patients were treated with antibiotics alone. Conclusion: The rates of medical management failure described in our review were much higher than those reported in the literature for thoracolumbar spinal epidural abscess patients, suggesting that CSEA patients may be at a greater risk for poor outcomes following nonoperative treatment. Thus, early surgery appears most viable for optimizing CSEA patient outcomes. Further research is needed in order to corroborate these recommendations.


2021 ◽  
pp. 219256822110391
Author(s):  
Nicholas L. Pitaro ◽  
Justin E. Tang ◽  
Varun Arvind ◽  
Brian H. Cho ◽  
Eric A. Geng ◽  
...  

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objectives: Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a rare but potentially life-threatening infection treated with antimicrobials and, in most cases, immediate surgical decompression. Previous studies comparing medical and surgical management of SEA are low powered and limited to a single institution. As such, the present study compares readmission in surgical and non-surgical management using a large national dataset. Methods: We identified all hospital admissions for SEA using the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD), which is the largest collection of hospital admissions data. Patients were grouped into surgically and non-surgically managed cohorts using ICD-10 coding and compared using information retrieved from the NRD such as demographics, comorbidities, length of stay and cost of admission. Results: We identified 350 surgically managed and 350 non-surgically managed patients. The 90-day readmission rates for surgical and non-surgical management were 26.0% and 35.1%, respectively ( P < .05). Expectedly, surgical management was associated with a significantly higher charge and length of stay at index hospital admission. Surgically managed patients had a significantly lower risk of readmission for osteomyelitis ( P < .05). Finally, in patients with a low comorbidity burden, we observed a significantly lower 90-day readmission rate for surgically managed patients (surgical: 23.0%, non-surgical: 33.8%, P < .05). Conclusion: In patients with a low comorbidity burden, we observed a significantly lower readmission rate for surgically managed patients than non-surgically managed patients. The results of this study suggest a lower readmission rate as an advantage to surgical management of SEA and emphasize the importance of SEA as a not-to-miss diagnosis.


2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. S69-S70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher G. Furey ◽  
Katherine Sadowski ◽  
Jon Belding ◽  
Nicholas U. Ahn

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. e066
Author(s):  
Ryo Sugawara ◽  
Ichiro Kikkawa ◽  
Hideaki Watanabe ◽  
Shuhei Hiyama ◽  
Yutaka Kikuchi ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 170 (7) ◽  
pp. 945-948 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elpis Mantadakis ◽  
Theodosios Birbilis ◽  
Lambros Michailidis ◽  
Vasileios Souftas ◽  
Athanassios Chatzimichael

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document