scholarly journals Special issue Visual system and image technology. 3. From perceptual characteristics to cognitive psychology. 3. Models of visual word perception and recognition.

1986 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 250-255
Author(s):  
Toshio Inui
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Psychology ◽  
Visual System ◽  
Visual Word ◽  
Word Perception ◽  
Special Issue ◽  
Perceptual Characteristics

Visual word recognition models should also be constrained by knowledge about the visual system

2012 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 287-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo Gomez ◽  
Sarah Silins
Keyword(s):  
Object Recognition ◽  
Word Recognition ◽  
Visual System ◽  
Visual Word Recognition ◽  
Visual Processing ◽  
Visual Word ◽  
Universal Models ◽  
European Languages ◽  
Models Of Reading ◽  
Reading Models

AbstractFrost's article advocates for universal models of reading and critiques recent models that concentrate in what has been described as “cracking the orthographic code.” Although the challenge to develop models that can account for word recognition beyond Indo-European languages is welcomed, we argue that reading models should also be constrained by general principles of visual processing and object recognition.

scholarly journals DETERMINING THE ELEMENTS OF THE TEXT ON IMAGE USING OF FUZZY COGNITIVE MODELS

2014 ◽  
pp. 95-102
Author(s):  
Elena Pyatikop
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Psychology ◽  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Visual System ◽  
Fuzzy Sets ◽  
Primary Visual Cortex ◽  
Text Processing ◽  
Cognitive Models ◽  
Primary Processing

This publication describes the modeling results of knowledge of cognitive psychology about the primary processing in the visual system to analyze the images in purpose to determine the elements of the text. Processing images at the level of primary visual cortex formalized using fuzzy sets.

The Dynamics of Visual Word Perception

1998 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jay Rueckl ◽  
Julie Brown
Keyword(s):  
Visual Word ◽  
Word Perception

ERP Evidence of Morphological Analysis from Orthography: A Masked Priming Study

2007 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 866-877 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aureliu Lavric ◽  
Amanda Clapp ◽  
Kathleen Rastle
Keyword(s):  
Morphological Analysis ◽  
Morphological Structure ◽  
Complex Form ◽  
Recognition System ◽  
Masked Priming ◽  
Visual Word ◽  
Word Perception ◽  
Complex Words ◽  
Morphological Relationship ◽  
Broad Consensus

There is broad consensus that the visual word recognition system is sensitive to morphological structure (e.g., “hunter” = “hunt” + “er”). Moreover, it has been assumed that the analysis of morphologically complex words (e.g., “hunter”) occurs only if the meaning of the complex form can be derived from the meanings of its constituents (e.g., “hunt” and “er”). However, recent behavioral work using masked priming has suggested that morphological analysis can occur at an early, orthographic level, with little influence from semantics. The present investigation examined the neurophysiological correlates of masked priming in conditions of a genuine morphological relationship (e.g., “hunter”-“HUNT”), an apparent morphological relationship (“corner”-“CORN”), and no morphological relationship (“brothel”-“BROTH”). Neural priming was indexed by the reduction of the N400 ERP component associated with targets preceded by related primes, as compared to targets preceded by unrelated primes. The mere appearance of morphological structure (“corner”-“CORN”) resulted in robust behavioral and neural priming, whose magnitude was similar to that observed in pairs with genuine morphological relationship and greater than that in the nonmorphological pairs. The results support a purely structural morphemic segmentation procedure operating in the early stages of visual word perception.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document