scholarly journals Use of Herd Solutions from a Random Regression Test-Day Model for Diagnostic Dairy Herd Management

2007 ◽  
Vol 90 (5) ◽  
pp. 2563-2568 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Koivula ◽  
J.I. Nousiainen ◽  
J. Nousiainen ◽  
E.A. Mäntysaari
1987 ◽  
Vol 70 (8) ◽  
pp. 1701-1709 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.B. Williams ◽  
P.A. Oltenacu ◽  
C.A. Bratton ◽  
R.A. Milligan

Author(s):  
Oto Hanuš ◽  
Luděk Stádník ◽  
Marcela Klimešová ◽  
Martin Tomáška ◽  
Lucie Hasoňová ◽  
...  

The good result reliability of regular analyzes of milk composition could improve the health monitoring of dairy cows and herd management. The aim of this study was the analysis of measurement of abilities and properties of RT (Real Time) system (AfiLab = AfiMilk (NIR measurement unit (near infrared spectroscopy) and electrical conductivity (C) of milk by conductometry) + AfiFarm (calibration and interpretation software)) for the analysis of individual milk samples (IMSs). There were 2 × 30 IMSs in the experiment. The reference values (RVs) of milk components and properties (fat (F), proteins (P), lactose (L), C and the somatic cell count (SCC)) were determined by conventional (direct and indirect: conductometry (C); infrared spectroscopy 1) with the filter technology and 2) with the Fourier transformations (F, P, L); fluoro-opto-electronic cell counting (SCC) in the film on the rotation disc (1) and by flow cytometry (2)) methods. AfiLab method (alternative) showed less close relationships as compared to the RVs as relationships between reference methods. This was expected. However, these relationships (r) were mostly significant: F from .597 to .738 (P ≤ 0.01 and ≤ 0.001); P from .284 to .787 (P > 0.05 and P ≤ 0.001); C .773 (P ≤ 0.001). Correlations (r) were not significant (P > 0.05): L from −.013 to .194; SCC from −.148 to −.133. Variability of the RVs explained the following percentages of variability in AfiLab results: F to 54.4 %; P to 61.9 %; L only 3.8 %; C to 59.7 %. Explanatory power (reliability) of AfiLab results to the animal is increasing with the regularity of their measurements (principle of real time application). Correlation values r (x minus 1.64 × sd for confidence interval (one-sided) at a level of 95 %) can be used for an alternative method in assessing the calibration quality. These limits are F 0.564, P 0.784 and C 0.715 and can be essential with the further implementation of this advanced technology of dairy herd management.


2011 ◽  
Vol 50 (No. 1) ◽  
pp. 7-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Zavadilová ◽  
E. Němcová ◽  
J. Přibyl ◽  
J. Wolf

The investigation was based on roughly 3.9, 2.7 and 1.7 million test-day records from first, second and third lactation, respectively, sampled from 596 200 Czech Holstein cows between the years 1991 and 2002. Breeding values were estimated from multi-lactation random-regression test-day models which contained the fixed effect of herd-test day, fixed regression on days in milk and random regressions on the animal level and the permanent environmental effect. Third degree Legendre polynomials (with four coefficients) were used for both the fixed and random regressions. The models differed in fixed regression. In Analysis I, 96 subclasses were defined according to age at calving, season and year of calving within lactation. In Analysis II, days open were additionally included as a grouping factor resulting in 480 subclasses. Rank correlations over 0.98 between both analyses were observed for breeding values for sires. Grouping according to Analysis I was recommended.  


2003 ◽  
Vol 86 (12) ◽  
pp. 4103-4114 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Ødegard ◽  
J. Jensen ◽  
G. Klemetsdal ◽  
P. Madsen ◽  
B. Heringstad

Animals ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 1689
Author(s):  
Daniel Warner ◽  
Elsa Vasseur ◽  
Marianne Villettaz Robichaud ◽  
Steve Adam ◽  
Doris Pellerin ◽  
...  

Continuous assessment of the herd status is important in order to monitor and adjust to changes in the welfare and health status but can be time consuming and expensive. In this study, herd status indicators from routinely collected dairy herd improvement (DHI) records were used to develop a remote herd assessment tool with the aim to help producers and advisors benchmark the herd status and identify herd management issues affecting welfare and health. Thirteen DHI indicators were selected from an initial set of 72 potential indicators collected on 4324 dairy herds in Eastern Canada. Data were normalized to percentile ranks and aggregated to a composite herd status index (HSI) with equal weights among indicators. Robustness analyses indicated little fluctuation for herds with a small HSI (low status) or large HSI (high status), suggesting that herds in need of support could be prioritized and effectively monitored over time, limiting the need for time-consuming farm visits. This tool allows evaluating herds relative to their peers through the composite index and highlighting specific areas with opportunities for improvements through the individual indicators. This procedure could be applied to similar multidimensional livestock farming issues, such as environmental and socio-economic studies.


2007 ◽  
Vol 6 (sup1) ◽  
pp. 153-155
Author(s):  
N. P. P. Macciotta ◽  
F. Miglior ◽  
A. Cappio-Borlino ◽  
L. R. Schaeffer

2008 ◽  
Vol 91 (11) ◽  
pp. 4393-4400 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Santellano-Estrada ◽  
C.M. Becerril-Pérez ◽  
J. de Alba ◽  
Y.M. Chang ◽  
D. Gianola ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akhilesh Singh ◽  
Sudipta Ghosh ◽  
Biswajit Roy ◽  
Deepak Tiwari ◽  
RPS Baghel

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document