scholarly journals An Automatic Extraction Method of Bone Tunnel after the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction from MDCT Image by Active Contour Model

2008 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-65
Author(s):  
Kouki NAGAMUNE ◽  
Koji NISHIMOTO ◽  
Yuichi HOSHINO ◽  
Seiji KUBO ◽  
Kiyonori MIZUNO ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Extraction Method ◽  
Active Contour ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Active Contour Model ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Bone Tunnel ◽  
Automatic Extraction ◽  
Contour Model ◽  
Mdct Image ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

scholarly journals The effect of femoral bone tunnel configuration on tendon-bone healing in an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 327-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Sato ◽  
R. Akagi ◽  
Y. Akatsu ◽  
Y. Matsuura ◽  
S. Takahashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Bone Healing ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Bone Tunnel ◽  
Femoral Bone ◽  
Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Objectives To compare the effect of femoral bone tunnel configuration on tendon-bone healing in an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction animal model. Methods Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the plantaris tendon as graft material was performed on both knees of 24 rabbits (48 knees) to mimic ACL reconstruction by two different suspensory fixation devices for graft fixation. For the adjustable fixation device model (Socket group; group S), a 5 mm deep socket was created in the lateral femoral condyle (LFC) of the right knee. For the fixed-loop model (Tunnel group; group T), a femoral tunnel penetrating the LFC was created in the left knee. Animals were sacrificed at four and eight weeks after surgery for histological evaluation and biomechanical testing. Results Histologically, both groups showed a mixture of direct and indirect healing patterns at four weeks, whereas only indirect healing patterns were observed in both groups at eight weeks. No significant histological differences were seen between the two groups at four and eight weeks in the roof zone (four weeks, S: mean 4.8 sd 1.7, T: mean 4.5 sd 0.5, p = 0.14; eight weeks, S: mean 5.8 sd 0.8, T: mean 4.8 sd 1.8, p = 0.88, Mann-Whitney U test) or side zone (four weeks, S: mean 5.0 sd 1.2, T: mean 4.8 sd 0.4, p = 0.43; eight weeks, S: mean 5.3 sd 0.8,T: mean 5.5 sd 0.8, p = 0.61, Mann-Whitney U test) . Similarly, no significant difference was seen in the maximum failure load between group S and group T at four (15.6 sd 9.0N and 13.1 sd 5.6N) or eight weeks (12.6 sd 3.6N and 17.1 sd 6.4N, respectively). Conclusion Regardless of bone tunnel configuration, tendon-bone healing after ACL reconstruction primarily occurred through indirect healing. No significant histological or mechanical differences were observed between adjustable and fixed-loop femoral cortical suspension methods. Cite this article: Y. Sato, R. Akagi, Y. Akatsu, Y. Matsuura, S. Takahashi, S. Yamaguchi, T. Enomoto, R. Nakagawa, H. Hoshi, T. Sasaki, S. Kimura, Y. Ogawa, A. Sadamasu, S. Ohtori, T. Sasho. The effect of femoral bone tunnel configuration on tendon-bone healing in an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: An animal study. Bone Joint Res 2018;7:327–335. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.75.BJR-2017-0238.R2.

scholarly journals Influence of Graft Bending Angle on Graft Maturation, the Femoral Tunnel, and Functional Outcomes by 12 Months After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 232596711988266
Author(s):  
Hong Li ◽  
Shaohua Liu ◽  
Yaying Sun ◽  
Hongyun Li ◽  
Shiyi Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Femoral Tunnel ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Bone Tunnel ◽  
Bending Angle ◽  
Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Functional Scores ◽  
Tunnel Diameter ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: The graft bending angle (GBA), the angle between the femoral bone tunnel and the line connecting the femoral and tibial tunnel apertures, has been proven to influence stress within the graft and could be an important factor in graft healing within the joint and bone tunnel. However, the influence of the GBA on functional outcomes, particularly on return to sports (RTS), is rarely reported. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of the GBA on graft maturation, the femoral tunnel, and functional outcomes at 12 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). We hypothesized that a greater GBA might be related to bone tunnel widening, poor graft healing, and inferior functional outcomes after ACLR. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 43 consecutive patients who underwent unilateral ACLR with hamstring tendon autografts participated in this study. Their knees were evaluated using functional scores (International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] score, Lysholm knee activity score, Tegner activity scale, RTS) and the anterior tibial translation side-to-side difference (ATTD), as measured using a KT-1000 arthrometer and 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), at 12 months after surgery. Based on MRI, the signal/noise quotient (SNQ) of the graft, the GBA, and the femoral tunnel diameter were measured. Results: The mean GBA was 56° (range, 41°-69°). The GBA had a significant positive correlation with the SNQ (rho, 0.45; P = .003) and bone tunnel diameter (rho, 0.35; P = .02), but it had no significant correlation with any functional scores. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on GBA values: low GBA (LGBA; 40° < GBA ≤ 50°), middle GBA (MGBA; 50° < GBA ≤ 60°), and high GBA (HGBA; 60° < GBA ≤ 70°). The HGBA group had a significantly higher mean SNQ than both the LGBA ( P = .01) and MGBA groups ( P = .02). It also had a greater mean tunnel diameter than the LGBA group ( P = .04). There was no significant difference in IKDC scores, Lysholm scores, ATTD, Tegner scores, or rates of RTS among groups. Conclusion: The GBA did not affect functional outcomes at 12 months after ACLR, although it affected the SNQ of the graft and the femoral tunnel diameter.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document