scholarly journals Characteristics of Ground Motions and Strong Motion Data of Buildings

2012 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-22
Author(s):  
T. Kashima
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motions ◽  
Strong Motion ◽  
Strong Motion Data ◽  
Motion Data

Overview of strong-motion data from the Darfield earthquake

2010 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 222-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jim Cousins ◽  
Graeme H. McVerry
Keyword(s):  
Main Shock ◽  
Ground Motions ◽  
Strong Motion ◽  
Vertical Acceleration ◽  
Strong Motion Data ◽  
Motion Data ◽  
Near Fault ◽  
Long Period ◽  
Fault Record ◽  
Stiff Soil

The Darfield earthquake of 3rd September 2010 UT and its aftershocks have yielded New Zealand’s richest set of strong-motion data since recording began in the early 1960s. Main-shock accelerograms were returned by 130 sites, ten of which had peak horizontal accelerations in the range 0.3 to 0.82g. One near-fault record, from Greendale, had a peak vertical acceleration of 1.26g. Eighteen records showed peak ground velocities exceeding 0.5 m/s, with three of them exceeding 1 m/s. The records included some with strong long-period directivity pulses, some with other long-period components that were related to a mixture of source and site effects, and some that exhibited the effects of liquefaction at their sites. There were marked differences between records on the deep alluvium of Christchurch City and the Canterbury Plains, and those on shallow stiff soil sites. The strong-motion records provide the opportunity to assess the effects of the earthquake in terms of the ground motions and their relationship to design motions. They also provide an invaluable set of near-source motions for seismological studies. Our report presents an overview of the records and some preliminary findings derived from them.

scholarly journals Empirical Spectral Amplification Function for a Reference Site Near Keddara Dam in Algeria using Strong Motion Data.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faouzi Gherboudj ◽  
Toufiq Ouzandja ◽  
Rabah Bensalem
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Reference Site ◽  
Ground Motions ◽  
Free Field ◽  
Strong Motion ◽  
Ambient Vibration ◽  
Motion Prediction ◽  
Ground Motion Prediction ◽  
Strong Motion Data ◽  
Motion Data

Abstract This paper deals with empirical spectral amplification function for a reference site (STK) near Keddara dam in Algeria using local strong ground motion of earthquakes of magnitudes Mw 4.0-6.8. Amplification function is obtained as the 5% damped mean spectral ratio of surface observed and the rock predicted ground motions and it is compared to the ambient vibration HVSR which shows a good agreement in terms of fundamental frequency and curve tendency. In addition, recorded ground motions are compared to surface predicted motion with modified GMPE, the site term of the local ground motion prediction equation is adjusted based on the obtained amplification function of the free field STK site. Examples of the M 6.8, M5.4 and M4.7 earthquakes show clearly the advantage of using the adjusted Ground Motion Prediction Equations (GMPE) for predicting surface ground motion. Site effect characterization and the adjusted GMPE presented in this study provide the basis elements toward partially non ergodic site specific-Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment (PSHA) application based on local strong motion data in Algeria.

Processed strong-motion data for the El Salvador earthquake of June 19, 1982

1988 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth W. Campbell ◽  
Sylvester Theodore Algermissen
Keyword(s):  
El Salvador ◽  
Strong Motion ◽  
Strong Motion Data ◽  
Motion Data

Duration prediction of Chilean strong motion data using machine learning

2021 ◽  
Vol 109 ◽  
pp. 103253
Author(s):  
Sarit Chanda ◽  
M.C. Raghucharan ◽  
K.S.K. Karthik Reddy ◽  
Vasudeo Chaudhari ◽  
Surendra Nadh Somala
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Strong Motion ◽  
Strong Motion Data ◽  
Motion Data ◽  
Duration Prediction

Re-digitization of Strong Motion Data Recorded by SMAC-M Accelerographs

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 1_25-1_45
Author(s):  
Toshihide KASHIMA ◽  
Shin KOYAMA ◽  
Hiroto NAKAGAWA
Keyword(s):  
Strong Motion ◽  
Strong Motion Data ◽  
Motion Data

A comparison of two methods for earthquake source inversion using strong motion seismograms

1994 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
B. P. Cohee ◽  
G. C. Beroza
Keyword(s):  
Rise Time ◽  
Seismic Moment ◽  
Strong Motion ◽  
Rupture Time ◽  
Rupture Propagation ◽  
Rupture Velocity ◽  
Strong Motion Data ◽  
Motion Data ◽  
Inversion Methods ◽  
Window Method

In this paper we compare two time-domain inversion methods that have been widely applied to the problem of modeling earthquake rupture using strong-motion seismograms. In the multi-window method, each point on the fault is allowed to rupture multiple times. This allows flexibility in the rupture time and hence the rupture velocity. Variations in the slip-velocity function are accommodated by variations in the slip amplitude in each time-window. The single-window method assumes that each point on the fault ruptures only once, when the rupture front passes. Variations in slip amplitude are allowed and variations in rupture velocity are accommodated by allowing the rupture time to vary. Because the multi-window method allows greater flexibility, it has the potential to describe a wider range of faulting behavior; however, with this increased flexibility comes an increase in the degrees of freedom and the solutions are comparatively less stable. We demonstrate this effect using synthetic data for a test model of the Mw 7.3 1992 Landers, California earthquake, and then apply both inversion methods to the actual recordings. The two approaches yield similar fits to the strong-motion data with different seismic moments indicating that the moment is not well constrained by strong-motion data alone. The slip amplitude distribution is similar using either approach, but important differences exist in the rupture propagation models. The single-window method does a better job of recovering the true seismic moment and the average rupture velocity. The multi-window method is preferable when rise time is strongly variable, but tends to overestimate the seismic moment. Both methods work well when the rise time is constant or short compared to the periods modeled. Neither approach can recover the temporal details of rupture propagation unless the distribution of slip amplitude is constrained by independent data.

scholarly journals The INGV real time strong motion data sharing during the 2016 Amatrice (central Italy) seismic sequence

2016 ◽  
Vol 59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Massa ◽  
Ezio D'Alema ◽  
Chiara Mascandola ◽  
Sara Lovati ◽  
Davide Scafidi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Data Sharing ◽  
Strong Motion ◽  
Main Task ◽  
Seismic Sequence ◽  
Web Portal ◽  
Epicentral Area ◽  
Strong Motion Data ◽  
Motion Data ◽  
The Web

<p><em>ISMD is the real time INGV Strong Motion database. During the recent August-September 2016 Amatrice, Mw 6.0, seismic sequence, ISMD represented the main tool for the INGV real time strong motion data sharing.  Starting from August 24<sup>th</sup>,  the main task of the web portal was to archive, process and distribute the strong-motion waveforms recorded  by the permanent and temporary INGV accelerometric stations, in the case of earthquakes with magnitude </em><em>≥</em><em> 3.0, occurring  in the Amatrice area and surroundings.  At present (i.e. September 30<sup>th</sup>, 2016), ISMD provides more than 21.000 strong motion waveforms freely available to all users. In particular, about 2.200 strong motion waveforms were recorded by the temporary network installed for emergency in the epicentral area by SISMIKO and EMERSITO working groups. Moreover, for each permanent and temporary recording site, the web portal provide a complete description of the necessary information to properly use the strong motion data.</em></p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document